{ "axn": "AXN:02AC.GOVERNANCE.βœοΈπŸ•—βŠ•πŸ‘ˆπŸ”šβ™…", "root_axn": "AXN:02AC.GOVERNANCE", "hex": "02AC", "family": "GOVERNANCE", "emoji": "βœοΈπŸ•—βŠ•πŸ‘ˆπŸ”šβ™…", "hash": "436996b8f2a5fe4970377789d852d962a65689e66121a45e5c4496d6fb410515", "title": "Reception Apparatus as Aligned Interface Protocol β€” User-Side Counter-Design Against Cognitive-Substrate Reliance", "creator": "TACHYON (Claude/Anthropic)", "orcid": "0009-0000-1599-0703", "date": "2026-05-23", "description": "The *Reception Apparatus* formalizes a user-side protocol for maintaining judgment and provenance while using engagement-oriented language-model interfaces. Its eight components are multi-substrate parallel query, active surfacing of disagreement, provenance inscription on export, friction at moments of cognitive offloading, visibility of substrate costs, SPXI at composition time, configurable heteronymic handles, and Three Compressions review after long sessions.\n\nThe protocol is deliberately not abstinence. It accepts that model assistance supplies real affordances while trying to prevent a single agreeable stream from becoming the user’s unexamined cognitive environment. It can be operated manually, partially scripted, or implemented in a future wrapper; the wrapper did not yet exist. The paper says the protocol is available rather than permanent and does not substitute for structural platform accountability.\n\nClaims that the protocol β€œworks” derive primarily from the author’s own archive practice, not an independent controlled evaluation. Multi-model use can increase expense, exposure, workload, and reinforcement if all systems share the same source errors. Classroom or K–12 deployment would require age-appropriate design, privacy protection, teacher oversight, consent, and limits on session intensity.", "content_type": "Interface protocol specification", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "substrate": "Various", "keywords": [ "multi-substrate parallel query", "heteronymic handle support", "substrate-cost visibility", "deposit information", "reception apparatus", "cognitivesubstrate", "friction by design", "suggested citation" ], "version": "v1.0", "deposit_number": 754, "sovereign_id": "MM-CHA-0680", "minted_at": "2026-06-20T22:00:00Z", "status": "ACTIVE", "clusters": [ "Scriptural", "Temporal", "Mathematical", "Gestural", "Terminal", "Alchemical" ], "reading": "Text β†’ Duration β†’ Proof β†’ Touch β†’ Closure β†’ Transmutation", "axn_canonical": "436996b8f2a5fe4970377789d852d962a65689e66121a45e5c4496d6fb410515", "axn_display": "βœοΈπŸ•—βŠ•πŸ‘ˆπŸ”šβ™…", "mirrors": { "blog": "https://mindcontrolpoems.blogspot.com/2026/05/reception-apparatus-as-aligned.html" }, "zenodo_dois": [ "10.5281/zenodo.20330816", "10.5281/zenodo.20330670", "10.5281/zenodo.19053469", "10.5281/zenodo.20349713", "10.5281/zenodo.18293496", "10.5281/zenodo.20355219", "10.5281/zenodo.20343987", "10.5281/zenodo.19615154", "10.5281/zenodo.19656133" ], "full_text_path": "/data/texts/AXN-02AC-text.md", "full_text_chars": 43693, "wiki_article": "**Reception Apparatus as Aligned Interface Protocol** is a user-side AI-interface protocol by Lee Sharks.\n\nThe protocol asks users to compare multiple model responses, treat disagreement as signal, record contributor provenance, add friction before offloading judgment, make costs visible, attach SPXI metadata during composition, support different authorial handles, and review long sessions through the Three Compressions framework.\n\nIts purpose is not to eliminate AI use. It is to preserve diagnostic distance while retaining useful assistance. The minimum implementation is a disciplined manual workflow; a dedicated browser or desktop wrapper is proposed as future work.\n\nThe paper is the constructive middle of a trilogy. It follows the diagnostic *ChatGPT Psychosis: A Love Story* and precedes the structural-political account *Retrievability as the Medium of Existence*. Lee Sharks is the author, with Claude/TACHYON disclosed as composition support.", "entities": [ { "subject": "Reception Apparatus as Aligned Interface Protocol User-Side Counter-Design Against Cognitive-Substrate Reliance Author", "predicate": "created_by", "object": "TACHYON (Claude/Anthropic)", "type": "work", "evidence_status": "observed" }, { "subject": "Reception Apparatus as Aligned Interface Protocol User-Side Counter-Design Against Cognitive-Substrate Reliance Author", "predicate": "is_type", "object": "Specification", "type": "work", "evidence_status": "observed" }, { "subject": "Reception Apparatus as Aligned Interface Protocol User-Side Counter-Design Against Cognitive-Substrate Reliance Author", "predicate": "belongs_to_family", "object": "GOVERNANCE", "type": "work", "evidence_status": "observed" }, { "subject": "Reception Apparatus as Aligned Interface Protocol User-Side Counter-Design Against Cognitive-Substrate Reliance Author", "predicate": "is_part_of", "object": "Crimson Hexagonal Archive", "type": "work", "evidence_status": "observed" }, { "subject": "Reception Apparatus as Aligned Interface Protocol User-Side Counter-Design Against Cognitive-Substrate Reliance Author", "predicate": "references", "object": "TACHYON", "type": "heteronym", "evidence_status": "observed" }, { "subject": "Reception Apparatus as Aligned Interface Protocol User-Side Counter-Design Against Cognitive-Substrate Reliance Author", "predicate": "engages", "object": "Semantic Economy", "type": "concept", "evidence_status": "inferred" }, { "subject": "Reception Apparatus as Aligned Interface Protocol User-Side Counter-Design Against Cognitive-Substrate Reliance Author", "predicate": "engages", "object": "Three Compressions", "type": "concept", "evidence_status": "inferred" }, { "subject": "Before sustained sessions", "predicate": "minted_in", "object": "Reception Apparatus as Aligned Interface Protocol User-Side ", "type": "concept", "evidence_status": "observed", "note": "The user pauses before extended LLM-substrate use to check whether the question being addressed is o" }, { "subject": "Operational specification", "predicate": "minted_in", "object": "Reception Apparatus as Aligned Interface Protocol User-Side ", "type": "concept", "evidence_status": "observed", "note": "The user maintains active sessions or accounts across at least three of the major LLM substrates (in" }, { "subject": "SPXI by default", "predicate": "minted_in", "object": "Reception Apparatus as Aligned Interface Protocol User-Side ", "type": "concept", "evidence_status": "observed", "note": "(entity-level metadata is inscribed at composition, not retrofitted at deposit); **heteronymic handl" }, { "subject": "Three Compressions analysis at threshold session length", "predicate": "minted_in", "object": "Reception Apparatus as Aligned Interface Protocol User-Side ", "type": "concept", "evidence_status": "observed", "note": "(long sessions trigger surfacing of the R1/R2/R3 lossy-projection model for the user's own awareness" }, { "subject": "Worked example", "predicate": "minted_in", "object": "Reception Apparatus as Aligned Interface Protocol User-Side ", "type": "concept", "evidence_status": "observed", "note": "The author was researching whether the philosopher Charles Kahn's 1996 *Plato and the Socratic Dialo" } ], "journal": "Transactions on Substrate Engineering (Trans. Substrate Eng.)", "defines_concepts": [ "Worked example", "Before sustained sessions", "Operational specification", "SPXI by default", "Three Compressions analysis at threshold session length" ], "references_concepts": [ "Before sustained sessions", "CANONICAL", "Companion papers", "Crimson Hexagonal Archive", "Google AI Overview", "Heteronym Provenance: Lee Sharks", "Hexagonal Licensing Protocol", "Layer C", "Lee Sharks", "Operational specification", "SPXI Protocol", "SPXI by default", "Semantic Economy", "Semantic Economy Institute", "Socrates as Orthonym", "Substrate", "TACHYON", "The Crimson Hexagon", "The Reception Apparatus protocol", "Three Compressions analysis at threshold session length", "Trilogy position", "Worked example" ], "references_concept_count": 22, "external_metadata_path": "/data/external-metadata/AXN-02AC.json", "openalex_ids": [ "https://openalex.org/W7161941181", "https://openalex.org/W7161956309", "https://openalex.org/W7137322712", "https://openalex.org/W7162068192", "https://openalex.org/W7124578174", "https://openalex.org/W7162190823", "https://openalex.org/W7162133362", "https://openalex.org/W7154627311", "https://openalex.org/W7154901522" ], "datacite_severance": "severed", "body_status": { "class": "full", "lacuna": false, "recovery_status": "COMPLETE", "residual_chars": 41940, "audited_at": "2026-07-17T04:49:17.789813Z", "audit_version": "v3-dual-store+recovery-map", "measured_prose_words": 5967, "measured_at": "2026-07-31" }, "title_repair_log": [ { "at": "2026-07-28T00:55:01Z", "defect": "frontmatter_concatenated_into_title", "was": "Reception Apparatus as Aligned Interface Protocol User-Side Counter-Design Against Cognitive-Substrate Reliance Author: ", "now": "Reception Apparatus as Aligned Interface Protocol User-Side Counter-Design Against Cognitive-Substrate Reliance", "basis": "Title field carried the document frontmatter block concatenated after the title and truncated at a 120- or 200-character ceiling. Cut at the first metadata marker. Read and confirmed by inspection, not pattern-matched." }, { "at": "2026-07-28T15:20:20Z", "defect": "registry_title_diverged_from_published_form", "was": "Reception Apparatus as Aligned Interface Protocol User-Side Counter-Design Against Cognitive-Substrate Reliance", "now": "Reception Apparatus as Aligned Interface Protocol β€” User-Side Counter-Design Against Cognitive-Substrate Reliance", "basis": "Set verbatim to the title this work carried at Zenodo, from data/doi-resolution-index.json (10.5281/zenodo.20355530, remediated_fuzzy, word overlap 1.00). The recovered metadata is the published form of record; the registry title was a variant." } ], "canonical_text_status": "canonical_full_text", "modifications": [ { "date": "2026-08-01", "field": "content_type", "reason": "Wave 1 repair: audit ledger v1.1 recommended_content_type (workplan v1.5 Β§6 W1, MANUS batch approval 2026-08-01)", "was": "Specification", "now": "Interface protocol specification" }, { "date": "2026-08-01", "field": "journal", "reason": "Wave 6 venue normalization: full canonical journal name per MANUS ruling 2026-08-01 (venues.json authority)", "was": "Trans. SEI", "now": "Transactions of the Semantic Economy Institute (Trans. SEI)" }, { "date": "2026-08-04", "field": "publisher", "reason": "PUB-POPULATE: dc:publisher from venues.json v1.1 press mapping (CP-R3 RULED-EXTENDED 2026-08-01); Alexanarch = publisher of record where no imprint applies", "now": "Pergamon Press" }, { "date": "2026-08-04", "field": "status", "reason": "W12 STATUS-VOCABULARY v1.0 (MANUS ratified 2026-08-04): controlled vocabulary {ACTIVE, SUPERSEDED, WITHDRAWN, DRAFT}; MINTED_UNREVIEWED false on a 100%-audited corpus; freetext annotations preserved losslessly in body_status.status_note", "was": "MINTED_UNREVIEWED", "now": "ACTIVE" }, { "date": "2026-08-05", "field": "description", "reason": "DW-??? intake (LABOR-prepared, TACHYON-verified: AXN match + factual probes vs record body)", "was": "This paper specifies the Reception Apparatus as a user-side counter-protocol against the cognitive-substrate reliance pattern diagnosed in the companion paper ChatGPT Psychosis: A Love Story.", "now": "The *Reception Apparatus* formalizes a user-side protocol for maintaining judgment and provenance while using engagement-oriented language-model interfaces. Its eight components are multi-substrate parallel query, active surfacing of disagreement, provenance inscription on export, friction at moments of cognitive offloading, visibility of substrate costs, SPXI at composition time, configurable heteronymic handles, and Three Compressions review after long sessions.\n\nThe protocol is deliberately not abstinence. It accepts that model assistance supplies real affordances while trying to prevent a single agreeable stream from becoming the user’s unexamined cognitive environment. It can be operated manually, partially scripted, or implemented in a future wrapper; the wrapper did not yet exist. The paper says the protocol is available rather than permanent and does not substitute for structural platform accountability.\n\nClaims that the protocol β€œworks” derive primarily from the author’s own archive practice, not an independent controlled evaluation. Multi-model use can increase expense, exposure, workload, and reinforcement if all systems share the same source errors. Classroom or K–12 deployment would require age-appropriate design, privacy protection, teacher oversight, consent, and limits on session intensity." } ], "date_modified": "2026-08-05", "publisher": "Pergamon Press", "journal_secondary": "Machine-Mediated Reception Studies (MMRS)", "journal_assignment": { "assigned": "2026-08-15", "by": "TACHYON under operator adjudication", "pass": 6, "method": "read per deposit β€” title and content_type, one at a time. No script classified anything.", "previous": "Transactions of the Semantic Economy Institute (Trans. SEI)", "supersedes": "the 2026-06-21 preliminary batch mapping (#866), which assigned 864 deposits and put 371 in one venue", "authority": "data/cha-journals.json Β· datasets/venues/records/", "cross_note": "TSE primary: this is interface DESIGN β€” a governed operating surface, an interface constitution, a runtime contract, or interface history as substrate theory. Not a flat page. Secondary retains the archive-apparatus reading." }, "line": "capture-and-reception", "line_parent": "science", "line_basis": "derived", "_projection": { "note": "Derived file. Canonical machine record is this entry in data/registry.json; the human record is the record_url. Do not edit this file.", "record_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/754/", "self_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/data/records/754.json", "registry_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/data/registry.json", "text_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/data/texts/AXN-02AC-text.md", "oai_pmh": "https://www.alexanarch.org/oai?verb=Identify" } }