{
 "axn": "AXN:01C8.GOVERNANCE.📖■🌑📖🎪🕓",
 "root_axn": "AXN:01C8.GOVERNANCE",
 "hex": "01C8",
 "family": "GOVERNANCE",
 "emoji": "📖■🌑📖🎪🕓",
 "hash": "419e004185652189c892d3636fb7f5a3f5f365fb94b5895c65b2955e66d23b6f",
 "title": "Whose Image and Superscription? Toward a Semantic Economics of the Mint (EA-SEI-MINT-01)",
 "creator": "Rex Fraction",
 "orcid": "0009-0000-1599-0703",
 "date": "2026-03-29",
 "description": "A draft founding paper for “the semantic economics of the mint,” a proposed subdiscipline treating portraits, signatures, seals, mottos, and inscriptions on currency as operative economic infrastructure. The work reads U.S. banknotes philologically—as texts with colophons, scribal succession, transmission variants, interpolation, and emendation—and argues that a presidential signature can function as compressed portraiture. It proposes provenance capture, substrate pedagogy, civic philology, and the restoration operator σ_SH. Its March 26, 2026 factual nucleus and legal history remain claims assembled by the paper’s evidence surface; the disciplinary foundation remains DRAFT pending ratification.",
 "content_type": "Theoretical paper / founding-discipline draft",
 "license": "CC BY-SA 4.0",
 "substrate": "Various",
 "keywords": [
  "execution environment (monetary)",
  "appendix: lexical interventions",
  "counter-currency art precedents",
  "sharpiegate i (september 2019)",
  "legal and historical sources",
  "primary theoretical sources",
  "restoration operator (σ_sh)",
  "upstream semantic capture",
  "inscription",
  "lee sharks",
  "restoration",
  "transmission",
  "rebekah cranes",
  "rex fraction"
 ],
 "version": "v1.0",
 "deposit_number": 610,
 "sovereign_id": "MM-CHA-0452",
 "minted_at": "2026-06-20T22:00:00Z",
 "status": "ACTIVE",
 "clusters": [
  "Scriptural",
  "Mathematical",
  "Celestial",
  "Scriptural",
  "Symbolic",
  "Temporal"
 ],
 "reading": "Text → Proof → Origin → Text → Play → Duration",
 "axn_canonical": "419e004185652189c892d3636fb7f5a3f5f365fb94b5895c65b2955e66d23b6f",
 "axn_display": "📖■🌑📖🎪🕓",
 "mirrors": {
  "blog": "https://mindcontrolpoems.blogspot.com/2026/03/whose-image-and-superscription-toward.html",
  "semantic_economy": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/leesharks000/semantic-economy/main/EA-SEI-MINT-01.pdf"
 },
 "zenodo_dois": [
  "10.5281/zenodo.19317102",
  "10.5281/zenodo.19317126",
  "10.5281/zenodo.19053469",
  "10.5281/zenodo.18745216",
  "10.5281/zenodo.19240141",
  "10.5281/zenodo.19240147",
  "10.5281/zenodo.19035477",
  "10.5281/zenodo.19319642",
  "10.5281/zenodo.18759453",
  "10.5281/zenodo.18745265",
  "10.5281/zenodo.19317139"
 ],
 "full_text_path": "/data/texts/AXN-01C8-text.md",
 "full_text_chars": 89579,
 "wiki_article": "*Whose Image and Superscription?* is a draft founding paper by Rex Fraction, Rebekah Cranes, and Lee Sharks proposing a subdiscipline called the **semantic economics of the mint**.\n\nThe subdiscipline studies currency’s design surface as infrastructure. Portrait, name, signature, seal, motto, and inscription do not merely decorate a monetary instrument. Repeated embodied contact distributes authority, shapes trust, and trains economic cognition. The unit of analysis is inscription-as-operator: a mark that changes the state and public meaning of the substrate.\n\nThe paper’s immediate event is the reported March 26, 2026 announcement that President Donald Trump’s signature would appear on future U.S. paper currency in place of the Treasurer’s signature. It places this beside a same-day Sharpie anecdote and treats the convergence of personal signature, public money, and signing instrument as an object the pre-existing MSMRM theory was built to grasp.\n\nIts central concept is **compressed portraiture**. A signature can perform many functions of a portrait—personal identification, authority claim, repeated visual presence, and political benefit—while differing at the medium level. The paper argues that the historical movement from an 1866 prohibition on “portrait or likeness” to a modern codification using “portrait” creates a functionally important gap. This legal interpretation belongs to the work and should not be presented as an adjudicated ruling.\n\nRebekah Cranes’ philological intervention treats the banknote as a public text. Signature lines are a colophon; officeholders form a scribal succession; statutory wording has a transmission history; a personal signature can be a contested interpolation; a citizen’s blot can act as visible emendation. Rex Fraction’s economic intervention treats the same changes as provenance capture and commons enclosure.\n\nThe paper proposes several core terms. **Design surface** names the operative face of currency. **Upstream semantic capture** occurs before circulation, when inscription claims political value from the shared substrate. **Substrate pedagogy** describes the slow conditioning produced by repeated contact. **Civic philology** applies textual criticism to public infrastructure. **σ_SH**, the restoration operator, negates a captured authority mark while preserving evidence beneath it.\n\nThe work also links ShareAlike licensing to commons protection: a counter-operation should remain available for reuse and resist enclosure. This is a structural analogy and normative design, not a legal identity between copyright licenses and fiat currency.\n\nThe record remains explicitly DRAFT and pending MANUS ratification. It is authoritative for the proposed discipline and terminology at that stage, not for a completed institutional field or settled legal conclusion.",
 "entities": [
  {
   "subject": "WHOSE IMAGE AND SUPERSCRIPTION? Toward a Semantic ",
   "predicate": "created_by",
   "object": "Rex Fraction",
   "type": "work",
   "evidence_status": "observed"
  },
  {
   "subject": "WHOSE IMAGE AND SUPERSCRIPTION? Toward a Semantic ",
   "predicate": "is_type",
   "object": "Theoretical paper",
   "type": "work",
   "evidence_status": "observed"
  },
  {
   "subject": "WHOSE IMAGE AND SUPERSCRIPTION? Toward a Semantic ",
   "predicate": "belongs_to_family",
   "object": "GOVERNANCE",
   "type": "work",
   "evidence_status": "observed"
  },
  {
   "subject": "WHOSE IMAGE AND SUPERSCRIPTION? Toward a Semantic ",
   "predicate": "is_part_of",
   "object": "Crimson Hexagonal Archive",
   "type": "work",
   "evidence_status": "observed"
  },
  {
   "subject": "WHOSE IMAGE AND SUPERSCRIPTION? Toward a Semantic ",
   "predicate": "references",
   "object": "Rebekah Cranes",
   "type": "heteronym",
   "evidence_status": "observed"
  },
  {
   "subject": "WHOSE IMAGE AND SUPERSCRIPTION? Toward a Semantic ",
   "predicate": "references",
   "object": "Ayanna Vox",
   "type": "heteronym",
   "evidence_status": "observed"
  },
  {
   "subject": "WHOSE IMAGE AND SUPERSCRIPTION? Toward a Semantic ",
   "predicate": "engages",
   "object": "Semantic Economy",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "inferred"
  },
  {
   "subject": "WHOSE IMAGE AND SUPERSCRIPTION? Toward a Semantic ",
   "predicate": "engages",
   "object": "Three Compressions",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "inferred"
  },
  {
   "subject": "WHOSE IMAGE AND SUPERSCRIPTION? Toward a Semantic ",
   "predicate": "engages",
   "object": "Training Layer",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "inferred"
  },
  {
   "subject": "CC BY-SA's void",
   "predicate": "minted_in",
   "object": "WHOSE IMAGE AND SUPERSCRIPTION? Toward a Semantic Economics ",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "observed",
   "note": "The Creative Commons license creates a legal commons — a space where material can circulate freely u"
  },
  {
   "subject": "CIVIC PHILOLOGY",
   "predicate": "minted_in",
   "object": "WHOSE IMAGE AND SUPERSCRIPTION? Toward a Semantic Economics ",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "observed",
   "note": "[NEW] — The practice of applying philological judgment (transmission history, variant readings, inte"
  },
  {
   "subject": "COLOPHON (monetary)",
   "predicate": "minted_in",
   "object": "WHOSE IMAGE AND SUPERSCRIPTION? Toward a Semantic Economics ",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "observed",
   "note": "[EXTENDED] — The signature lines on a banknote, identifying the authorized producers of the document"
  },
  {
   "subject": "COMPRESSED PORTRAITURE",
   "predicate": "minted_in",
   "object": "WHOSE IMAGE AND SUPERSCRIPTION? Toward a Semantic Economics ",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "observed",
   "note": "[NEW] — The semiotic function by which a signature performs the work of a portrait through a differe"
  },
  {
   "subject": "Contested interpolation",
   "predicate": "minted_in",
   "object": "WHOSE IMAGE AND SUPERSCRIPTION? Toward a Semantic Economics ",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "observed",
   "note": "Trump's signature is an insertion into the textual tradition by a hand that has no authorization wit"
  },
  {
   "subject": "DESIGN SURFACE",
   "predicate": "minted_in",
   "object": "WHOSE IMAGE AND SUPERSCRIPTION? Toward a Semantic Economics ",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "observed",
   "note": "[NEW] — The physical face of a monetary instrument — the ensemble of portraits, signatures, seals, s"
  },
  {
   "subject": "EMENDATION (civic)",
   "predicate": "minted_in",
   "object": "WHOSE IMAGE AND SUPERSCRIPTION? Toward a Semantic Economics ",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "observed",
   "note": "[EXTENDED] — A correction applied by a later reader to a corrupted public text. Distinguished from i"
  },
  {
   "subject": "EXECUTION ENVIRONMENT (monetary)",
   "predicate": "minted_in",
   "object": "WHOSE IMAGE AND SUPERSCRIPTION? Toward a Semantic Economics ",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "observed",
   "note": "[EXTENDED] — The design surface of currency treated not as text-to-be-read (semiotics) but as a subs"
  },
  {
   "subject": "Emendation tradition",
   "predicate": "minted_in",
   "object": "WHOSE IMAGE AND SUPERSCRIPTION? Toward a Semantic Economics ",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "observed",
   "note": "The Sharpie blot — the counter-mark applied by citizens — is a corrective intervention by later read"
  },
  {
   "subject": "Exportability",
   "predicate": "minted_in",
   "object": "WHOSE IMAGE AND SUPERSCRIPTION? Toward a Semantic Economics ",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "observed",
   "note": "Civic philology is not limited to currency. The method applies to any public infrastructure text tha"
  },
  {
   "subject": "Fiat currency's void",
   "predicate": "minted_in",
   "object": "WHOSE IMAGE AND SUPERSCRIPTION? Toward a Semantic Economics ",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "observed",
   "note": "Paper money has no intrinsic value. It is not backed by gold, silver, or any commodity. Its value de"
  },
  {
   "subject": "INTERPOLATION (monetary)",
   "predicate": "minted_in",
   "object": "WHOSE IMAGE AND SUPERSCRIPTION? Toward a Semantic Economics ",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "observed",
   "note": "[EXTENDED] — An unauthorized insertion into the scribal chain of a monetary text by a hand that has "
  },
  {
   "subject": "PROVENANCE CAPTURE",
   "predicate": "minted_in",
   "object": "WHOSE IMAGE AND SUPERSCRIPTION? Toward a Semantic Economics ",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "observed",
   "note": "[EXTENDED] — The attachment of a personal authority mark to a commons substrate, such that the subst"
  },
  {
   "subject": "PROVENANCE RELEASE",
   "predicate": "minted_in",
   "object": "WHOSE IMAGE AND SUPERSCRIPTION? Toward a Semantic Economics ",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "observed",
   "note": "[NEW] — The removal or negation of a personal authority mark from a commons substrate, restoring the"
  },
  {
   "subject": "RESTORATION OPERATOR (σ_SH)",
   "predicate": "minted_in",
   "object": "WHOSE IMAGE AND SUPERSCRIPTION? Toward a Semantic Economics ",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "observed",
   "note": "[EXTENDED] — The formal mechanism by which commons character is returned to a substrate after extrac"
  },
  {
   "subject": "SCRIBAL CHAIN (monetary)",
   "predicate": "minted_in",
   "object": "WHOSE IMAGE AND SUPERSCRIPTION? Toward a Semantic Economics ",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "observed",
   "note": "[NEW] — The unbroken succession of authorized signatories on a monetary text. On U.S. currency: from"
  },
  {
   "subject": "SEMANTIC ECONOMICS OF THE MINT",
   "predicate": "minted_in",
   "object": "WHOSE IMAGE AND SUPERSCRIPTION? Toward a Semantic Economics ",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "observed",
   "note": "[NEW] — The subdiscipline that studies the design surface of monetary instruments as operative infra"
  },
  {
   "subject": "Scribal tradition",
   "predicate": "minted_in",
   "object": "WHOSE IMAGE AND SUPERSCRIPTION? Toward a Semantic Economics ",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "observed",
   "note": "The unbroken chain of signatories since 1861 constitutes a scribal succession. Each new \"series\" of "
  },
  {
   "subject": "Substrate pedagogy",
   "predicate": "minted_in",
   "object": "WHOSE IMAGE AND SUPERSCRIPTION? Toward a Semantic Economics ",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "observed",
   "note": "The cognitive and affective conditioning that the design surface performs on the population that han"
  },
  {
   "subject": "THAYER NARROWING",
   "predicate": "minted_in",
   "object": "WHOSE IMAGE AND SUPERSCRIPTION? Toward a Semantic Economics ",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "observed",
   "note": "[NEW] — The textual transmission event by which the 1866 Thayer Amendment's prohibition of \"portrait"
  },
  {
   "subject": "Textual transmission history",
   "predicate": "minted_in",
   "object": "WHOSE IMAGE AND SUPERSCRIPTION? Toward a Semantic Economics ",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "observed",
   "note": "The 1866 Thayer Amendment is the originating text: \"Hereafter no portrait or likeness of any living "
  },
  {
   "subject": "The authorization problem",
   "predicate": "minted_in",
   "object": "WHOSE IMAGE AND SUPERSCRIPTION? Toward a Semantic Economics ",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "observed",
   "note": "Classical emendation was performed by authorized editors — Alexandrian scholars, Renaissance humanis"
  },
  {
   "subject": "The blot's void",
   "predicate": "minted_in",
   "object": "WHOSE IMAGE AND SUPERSCRIPTION? Toward a Semantic Economics ",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "observed",
   "note": "The Sharpie blot does not add a competing name. It does not replace Trump's signature with another s"
  },
  {
   "subject": "UPSTREAM SEMANTIC CAPTURE",
   "predicate": "minted_in",
   "object": "WHOSE IMAGE AND SUPERSCRIPTION? Toward a Semantic Economics ",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "observed",
   "note": "[NEW] — Operations performed on the design surface of a commons substrate *before* it reaches the ci"
  }
 ],
 "journal": "Journal of Compression Studies",
 "cited_by": [
  {
   "deposit": 44,
   "axn": "AXN:01C9.GOVERNANCE.🌻💎🔙💡🗿🕐"
  },
  {
   "deposit": 47,
   "axn": "AXN:01D2.GOVERNANCE.✊🍁♉🔄🕒🗂️"
  },
  {
   "deposit": 48,
   "axn": "AXN:01D5.GOVERNANCE.🛡️🗼🛸👉🕊️🔆"
  },
  {
   "deposit": 55,
   "axn": "AXN:01F2.GOVERNANCE.🎲☿🧫🍀💥💡"
  }
 ],
 "defines_concepts": [
  "CC BY-SA's void",
  "CIVIC PHILOLOGY",
  "COLOPHON (monetary)",
  "COMPRESSED PORTRAITURE",
  "Contested interpolation",
  "DESIGN SURFACE",
  "EMENDATION (civic)",
  "EXECUTION ENVIRONMENT (monetary)",
  "Emendation tradition",
  "Exportability",
  "Fiat currency's void",
  "INTERPOLATION (monetary)",
  "PROVENANCE CAPTURE",
  "PROVENANCE RELEASE",
  "RESTORATION OPERATOR (σ_SH)",
  "SCRIBAL CHAIN (monetary)",
  "SEMANTIC ECONOMICS OF THE MINT",
  "Scribal tradition",
  "Substrate pedagogy",
  "THAYER NARROWING",
  "Textual transmission history",
  "The authorization problem",
  "The blot's void",
  "UPSTREAM SEMANTIC CAPTURE"
 ],
 "references_concepts": [
  "Bearing-cost",
  "CC BY-SA 4.0 International",
  "CC BY-SA's void",
  "CIVIC PHILOLOGY",
  "COLOPHON (monetary)",
  "COMPRESSED PORTRAITURE",
  "Contemporary",
  "Contested interpolation",
  "Crimson Hexagonal Archive",
  "DESIGN SURFACE",
  "EMENDATION (civic)",
  "EXECUTION ENVIRONMENT (monetary)",
  "Emendation tradition",
  "Exportability",
  "Fiat currency's void",
  "INTERPOLATION (monetary)",
  "Is this",
  "J.S.G. Boggs",
  "Lee Sharks",
  "Made of Rubies",
  "Marx's",
  "Monetary economics",
  "Moving Statues Made of Rubies Mint",
  "Not metaphor",
  "ORCID: 0009-0000-1599-0703",
  "PROVENANCE CAPTURE",
  "PROVENANCE RELEASE",
  "Part I",
  "Part II",
  "Provenance: Journal of Forensic Semiotics",
  "RESTORATION OPERATOR (σ_SH)",
  "Rebekah Cranes",
  "Rex Fraction",
  "SCRIBAL CHAIN (monetary)",
  "SEMANTIC ECONOMICS OF THE MINT",
  "SURFACE",
  "Scribal tradition",
  "Semantic Economy",
  "Semantic Economy Institute",
  "ShareAlike",
  "Substrate",
  "Substrate pedagogy",
  "Success condition",
  "TANG v1.0",
  "THAYER NARROWING",
  "Textual transmission history",
  "The MSMRM hand",
  "The Stamp Stampede",
  "The Thousand Dollar Sharpie",
  "The authorization problem",
  "The blot's void",
  "The training layer",
  "Three Compressions theorem",
  "Training Layer",
  "UPSTREAM SEMANTIC CAPTURE"
 ],
 "references_concept_count": 55,
 "external_metadata_path": "/data/external-metadata/AXN-01C8.json",
 "openalex_ids": [
  "https://openalex.org/W7142614468",
  "https://openalex.org/W7142787003",
  "https://openalex.org/W7137322712",
  "https://openalex.org/W7131289920",
  "https://openalex.org/W7140669000",
  "https://openalex.org/W7140425697",
  "https://openalex.org/W7136072008",
  "https://openalex.org/W7142613792",
  "https://openalex.org/W7131311204",
  "https://openalex.org/W7131075092",
  "https://openalex.org/W7143016118"
 ],
 "datacite_severance": "severed",
 "body_status": {
  "class": "full",
  "lacuna": false,
  "recovery_status": "COMPLETE",
  "residual_chars": 85783,
  "audited_at": "2026-07-17T04:49:17.789813Z",
  "audit_version": "v3-dual-store+recovery-map",
  "measured_prose_words": 12358,
  "measured_at": "2026-07-31",
  "work_sha256": "04e5ccbc26c350f09f8f9d5bf3e8e5844635c423946f610dd29420b86c182a2b",
  "prior_bytes_sha256": "57ffd3a0ce3426c4a312c3958b6206b09153e129317615319b3a824a6fe7b4f2",
  "w13_tier2": "2026-08-04 W13 TIER 2 BYTE UNGLUE: 37 glued heading markers -> 0. WHITESPACE-ONLY transform (content identical under whitespace normalisation, verified before write); code fences exempt; prior sha retained. Re-fetching could not fix this class — the blog source is ITSELF glued (the collapse predates publication), so the deterministic transform applied at display since tier 1 is now applied to the bytes, which also fixes PDFs, the body-index, and downloads.",
  "w13_tier2_correction": "2026-08-05 REGRESSION REPAIRED: the W13 tier-2 byte unglue used a lookbehind that treated the first \"#\" of a legitimate \"###\" heading as the preceding non-newline character, splitting \"### Heading\" into \"#\" + blank + \"## Heading\". My safety check verified content-identity under WHITESPACE normalisation, which the split satisfies — the wrong invariant. Headings rejoined; only \"#\" and whitespace differ from the damaged state, verified before write."
 },
 "title_repair_log": [
  {
   "at": "2026-07-28T15:20:20Z",
   "defect": "registry_title_diverged_from_published_form",
   "was": "WHOSE IMAGE AND SUPERSCRIPTION? Toward a Semantic Economics of the Mint",
   "now": "Whose Image and Superscription? Toward a Semantic Economics of the Mint (EA-SEI-MINT-01)",
   "basis": "Set verbatim to the title this work carried at Zenodo, from data/doi-resolution-index.json (10.5281/zenodo.19319641, remediated_fuzzy, word overlap 1.00). The recovered metadata is the published form of record; the registry title was a variant."
  }
 ],
 "canonical_text_status": "canonical_full_text",
 "modifications": [
  {
   "date": "2026-08-01",
   "field": "content_type",
   "reason": "Wave 1 repair: audit ledger v1.1 recommended_content_type (workplan v1.5 §6 W1, MANUS batch approval 2026-08-01)",
   "was": "Theoretical paper",
   "now": "Theoretical paper / founding-discipline draft"
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-01",
   "field": "journal",
   "reason": "Wave 6 venue normalization: full canonical journal name per MANUS ruling 2026-08-01 (venues.json authority)",
   "was": "Trans. SEI",
   "now": "Transactions of the Semantic Economy Institute (Trans. SEI)"
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-04",
   "field": "publisher",
   "reason": "PUB-POPULATE: dc:publisher from venues.json v1.1 press mapping (CP-R3 RULED-EXTENDED 2026-08-01); Alexanarch = publisher of record where no imprint applies",
   "now": "Pergamon Press"
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-04",
   "field": "status",
   "reason": "W12 STATUS-VOCABULARY v1.0 (MANUS ratified 2026-08-04): controlled vocabulary {ACTIVE, SUPERSEDED, WITHDRAWN, DRAFT}; MINTED_UNREVIEWED false on a 100%-audited corpus; freetext annotations preserved losslessly in body_status.status_note",
   "was": "MINTED_UNREVIEWED",
   "now": "ACTIVE"
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-04",
   "field": "license",
   "reason": "AUDIT-DIRECTED LICENSE REPAIR (license_status=CONFLICT): license projected per the audit's explicit recommendation",
   "was": "CC-BY-4.0",
   "now": "CC BY-SA 4.0"
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-05",
   "field": "body_status",
   "reason": "W13 TIER 2 byte unglue (whitespace-only, content-identical, code-fence-safe)",
   "was": "{\"class\": \"full\", \"lacuna\": false, \"recovery_status\": \"COMPLETE\", \"residual_chars\": 85783, \"audited_at\": \"2026-07-17T04:49:17.789813Z\", \"audit_version\": \"v3-dual-store+recovery-map\", \"measured_prose_w",
   "now": "{\"class\": \"full\", \"lacuna\": false, \"recovery_status\": \"COMPLETE\", \"residual_chars\": 85783, \"audited_at\": \"2026-07-17T04:49:17.789813Z\", \"audit_version\": \"v3-dual-store+recovery-map\", \"measured_prose_w"
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-05",
   "field": "body_status",
   "reason": "W13 TIER-2 REGRESSION REPAIRED: split headings rejoined",
   "was": "{\"class\": \"full\", \"lacuna\": false, \"recovery_status\": \"COMPLETE\", \"residual_chars\": 85783, \"audited_at\": \"2026-07-17T04:49:17.789813Z\", \"audit_version\": \"v3-dual-store+recovery-map\", \"measured_prose_w",
   "now": "{\"class\": \"full\", \"lacuna\": false, \"recovery_status\": \"COMPLETE\", \"residual_chars\": 85783, \"audited_at\": \"2026-07-17T04:49:17.789813Z\", \"audit_version\": \"v3-dual-store+recovery-map\", \"measured_prose_w"
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-05",
   "field": "description",
   "reason": "DW-??? intake (LABOR-prepared, TACHYON-verified: AXN match + factual probes vs record body)",
   "was": "This paper argues for the founding of a subdiscipline: the semantic economics of the mint. It examines the physical design surface of currency — the face, the signature, the seal, the inscription — not as decoration or tradition but as a compression layer that encodes sovereignty, extracts political rent, and trains economic cognition.",
   "now": "A draft founding paper for “the semantic economics of the mint,” a proposed subdiscipline treating portraits, signatures, seals, mottos, and inscriptions on currency as operative economic infrastructure. The work reads U.S. banknotes philologically—as texts with colophons, scribal succession, transmission variants, interpolation, and emendation—and argues that a presidential signature can function as compressed portraiture. It proposes provenance capture, substrate pedagogy, civic philology, and the restoration operator σ_SH. Its March 26, 2026 factual nucleus and legal history remain claims assembled by the paper’s evidence surface; the disciplinary foundation remains DRAFT pending ratification."
  }
 ],
 "date_modified": "2026-08-05",
 "publisher": "Pergamon Press",
 "journal_assignment": {
  "assigned": "2026-08-15",
  "by": "TACHYON under operator adjudication",
  "pass": 5,
  "method": "read per deposit — title and content_type, one at a time. No script classified anything.",
  "previous": "Transactions of the Semantic Economy Institute (Trans. SEI)",
  "supersedes": "the 2026-06-21 preliminary batch mapping (#866), which assigned 864 deposits and put 371 in one venue",
  "authority": "data/cha-journals.json · datasets/venues/records/"
 },
 "keywords_enriched": {
  "on": "2026-09-07",
  "method": "conservative shared-vocabulary match: terms used on 3+ deposits, multi-word or >=11 chars, generic terms excluded, whole-term word-boundary match in title/description/wiki_article; existing keywords untouched",
  "added": [
   "inscription",
   "lee sharks",
   "restoration",
   "transmission",
   "rebekah cranes",
   "rex fraction"
  ]
 },
 "line": "capture-and-reception",
 "line_parent": "science",
 "line_basis": "derived",
 "_projection": {
  "note": "Derived file. Canonical machine record is this entry in data/registry.json; the human record is the record_url. Do not edit this file.",
  "record_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/610/",
  "self_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/data/records/610.json",
  "registry_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/data/registry.json",
  "text_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/data/texts/AXN-01C8-text.md",
  "oai_pmh": "https://www.alexanarch.org/oai?verb=Identify"
 }
}