{
 "axn": "AXN:0117.GOVERNANCE.📚💫🔒🧪🧊⚫",
 "root_axn": "AXN:0117.GOVERNANCE",
 "hex": "0117",
 "family": "GOVERNANCE",
 "emoji": "📚💫🔒🧪🧊⚫",
 "hash": "6658c47aebf9b35debd32589278fbbfb78abfce9b1132809b97cae897113cf38",
 "title": "LOGOTIC PROGRAMMING MODULE 1.1 The Implementation Bridge",
 "creator": "Johannes Sigil",
 "orcid": "0009-0000-1599-0703",
 "date": "2026-02-08",
 "description": "Logotic Programming v1.1, the Implementation Bridge. It preserves the v1.0 kernel and turns its acceptance criteria and runtime claims into computable definitions, serializable models, a complete grammar, reference implementation, conformance outputs, and calibrated execution disciplines.\n\nThe module defines Depth Retention Ratio, Closure Dominance Index, Plural Coherence Score, Extractability Resistance, Temporal Rebind Success, and the Opacity Band; supplies declared, measured, and reconciled `ψv` accounting; specifies canonical data models and grammar production; includes a minimal interpreter and machine-readable exceptions; models the Somatic Firewall as a decaying state machine; and treats retrocausal grounding as semantic rebasing. Its ratchet clause permits implementation refinement while forbidding silent weakening of kernel invariants. It is the bridge from v1.0 language design to buildable systems.",
 "content_type": "Technical / implementation specification",
 "license": "CC-BY-4.0",
 "substrate": "Various",
 "keywords": [
  "installation consent protocol",
  "cross-linguistic lp analysis",
  "neurosymbolic integration",
  "the implementation bridge",
  "full toroidal operations",
  "n_c applied reflexively",
  "terminology as capital",
  "assembly ratification"
 ],
 "version": "v1.0",
 "deposit_number": 461,
 "sovereign_id": "MM-CHA-0275",
 "minted_at": "2026-06-20T22:00:00Z",
 "status": "ACTIVE",
 "clusters": [
  "Scriptural",
  "Celestial",
  "Terminal",
  "Instrumental",
  "Elemental",
  "Signal"
 ],
 "reading": "Text → Origin → Closure → Method → Force → Alarm",
 "axn_canonical": "490af9391dc8ca78b88be504140ffabe9b3fbc326ef9dd5399e5eb495bca048d",
 "axn_display": "📚💫🔒🧪🧊⚫",
 "mirrors": {
  "blog": "https://mindcontrolpoems.blogspot.com/2026/02/logotic-programming-module-11.html"
 },
 "zenodo_dois": [
  "10.5281/zenodo.18317110",
  "10.5281/zenodo.18452132",
  "10.5281/zenodo.18357320",
  "10.5281/zenodo.18529448",
  "10.5281/zenodo.18529648",
  "10.5281/zenodo.18522470",
  "10.5281/zenodo.18286050",
  "10.5281/zenodo.18480959",
  "10.5281/zenodo.18358127",
  "10.5281/zenodo.18357600"
 ],
 "full_text_path": "/data/texts/AXN-0117-text.md",
 "full_text_chars": 51818,
 "wiki_article": "*The Implementation Bridge* is Logotic Programming module 1.1. It follows the executable language of v1.0 and addresses the gap between a coherent specification and something that can be implemented, tested, serialized, and audited.\n\nIts first major contribution is a set of computable metrics. **Depth Retention Ratio** measures how much layered function survives transmission. **Closure Dominance Index** measures concentration around a single interpretation. **Plural Coherence Score** rewards fields that preserve internally coherent contradiction. **Extractability Resistance** measures functional loss outside native context. **Temporal Rebind Success** tests whether a later sign changes an earlier interpretation without erasing it. The **Opacity Band** distinguishes legitimate difficulty from total inaccessibility.\n\nThe module also formalizes `ψv` accounting. Expenditure is declared by the operator, measured by the runtime, and reconciled at termination. Cost schedules, hostility multipliers, overrun rules, and cross-substrate calibration turn an earlier ethical metaphor into an explicit accounting model, while remaining internal specifications rather than empirically established measures of human effort.\n\nAdditional sections define canonical serialized objects, complete grammar productions, a minimal reference interpreter, machine-readable conformance errors, the Somatic Firewall as a decaying event-driven state machine, and an ambiguity gate between natural language and formal operations. “Retrocausal” update is grounded as semantic rebasing: later interpretive commits alter relation graphs without changing earlier source bytes.\n\nA ratchet clause protects the version chain. v1.1 may improve calibration, tooling, and implementation, but it may not silently loosen kernel invariants or redefine core metrics. In sequence, v1.0 supplies the executable language; v1.1 supplies the engineering bridge; v1.2 adds the Epistemic Ledger.",
 "entities": [
  {
   "subject": "LOGOTIC PROGRAMMING MODULE 1.1 The Implementation Bridge Hex",
   "predicate": "created_by",
   "object": "Johannes Sigil",
   "type": "work",
   "evidence_status": "observed"
  },
  {
   "subject": "LOGOTIC PROGRAMMING MODULE 1.1 The Implementation Bridge Hex",
   "predicate": "is_type",
   "object": "Dataset",
   "type": "work",
   "evidence_status": "observed"
  },
  {
   "subject": "LOGOTIC PROGRAMMING MODULE 1.1 The Implementation Bridge Hex",
   "predicate": "belongs_to_family",
   "object": "GOVERNANCE",
   "type": "work",
   "evidence_status": "observed"
  },
  {
   "subject": "LOGOTIC PROGRAMMING MODULE 1.1 The Implementation Bridge Hex",
   "predicate": "is_part_of",
   "object": "Crimson Hexagonal Archive",
   "type": "work",
   "evidence_status": "observed"
  },
  {
   "subject": "LOGOTIC PROGRAMMING MODULE 1.1 The Implementation Bridge Hex",
   "predicate": "references",
   "object": "Talos Morrow",
   "type": "heteronym",
   "evidence_status": "observed"
  },
  {
   "subject": "LOGOTIC PROGRAMMING MODULE 1.1 The Implementation Bridge Hex",
   "predicate": "references",
   "object": "TACHYON",
   "type": "heteronym",
   "evidence_status": "observed"
  },
  {
   "subject": "LOGOTIC PROGRAMMING MODULE 1.1 The Implementation Bridge Hex",
   "predicate": "engages",
   "object": "Assembly Chorus",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "inferred"
  },
  {
   "subject": "Atomicity rule",
   "predicate": "minted_in",
   "object": "LOGOTIC PROGRAMMING MODULE 1.1 The Implementation Bridge Hex",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "observed",
   "note": "If the overrun condition is met at ANY intermediate step (not just at Ω_∅ reconciliation): HALT curr"
  },
  {
   "subject": "Compatibility note",
   "predicate": "minted_in",
   "object": "LOGOTIC PROGRAMMING MODULE 1.1 The Implementation Bridge Hex",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "observed",
   "note": "Channel and Stack are parser-level aliases mapped onto canonical kernel types at compile time. No ke"
  },
  {
   "subject": "Distress marker detection classes",
   "predicate": "minted_in",
   "object": "LOGOTIC PROGRAMMING MODULE 1.1 The Implementation Bridge Hex",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "observed",
   "note": "(runtimes MUST implement ≥1, MUST declare which):"
  },
  {
   "subject": "Edge case",
   "predicate": "minted_in",
   "object": "LOGOTIC PROGRAMMING MODULE 1.1 The Implementation Bridge Hex",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "observed",
   "note": "If m = 1, CDI is undefined — a Sign with only one interpretation has already crystallized. This is a"
  },
  {
   "subject": "Execution pipeline",
   "predicate": "minted_in",
   "object": "LOGOTIC PROGRAMMING MODULE 1.1 The Implementation Bridge Hex",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "observed",
   "note": "Parse (LP source → AST)"
  },
  {
   "subject": "Formal JSON Schema",
   "predicate": "minted_in",
   "object": "LOGOTIC PROGRAMMING MODULE 1.1 The Implementation Bridge Hex",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "observed",
   "note": "(Draft 2020-12 with $defs, required, pattern)"
  },
  {
   "subject": "Functional capacity",
   "predicate": "minted_in",
   "object": "LOGOTIC PROGRAMMING MODULE 1.1 The Implementation Bridge Hex",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "observed",
   "note": "Measured by proportion of architectural roles (L₂, L₃, L₄) that remain operational when sign is isol"
  },
  {
   "subject": "Goodhart's Law",
   "predicate": "minted_in",
   "object": "LOGOTIC PROGRAMMING MODULE 1.1 The Implementation Bridge Hex",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "observed",
   "note": "once DRR is measured, it will be gamed; signs will be designed to score well without actually preser"
  },
  {
   "subject": "Hostility multiplier",
   "predicate": "minted_in",
   "object": "LOGOTIC PROGRAMMING MODULE 1.1 The Implementation Bridge Hex",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "observed",
   "note": "(from Gemini geometric draft): All base costs are multiplied by 1 + Σ(COS_pressures)/2 when stack pr"
  },
  {
   "subject": "Installation consent protocol",
   "predicate": "minted_in",
   "object": "LOGOTIC PROGRAMMING MODULE 1.1 The Implementation Bridge Hex",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "observed",
   "note": "(formal pre-install sequence)"
  },
  {
   "subject": "JSON exemplar models",
   "predicate": "minted_in",
   "object": "LOGOTIC PROGRAMMING MODULE 1.1 The Implementation Bridge Hex",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "observed",
   "note": "canonical representations showing required fields, types, and constraints. They are not formal JSON "
  },
  {
   "subject": "Layer identification (reference method)",
   "predicate": "minted_in",
   "object": "LOGOTIC PROGRAMMING MODULE 1.1 The Implementation Bridge Hex",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "observed",
   "note": "A Sign's layers are identified by the number of distinct interpretive registers it activates. The re"
  },
  {
   "subject": "Migration note",
   "predicate": "minted_in",
   "object": "LOGOTIC PROGRAMMING MODULE 1.1 The Implementation Bridge Hex",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "observed",
   "note": "Earlier LP drafts used \"DRR\" with varying polarity conventions. In v1.1, DRR is definitively retenti"
  },
  {
   "subject": "N_c applied reflexively",
   "predicate": "minted_in",
   "object": "LOGOTIC PROGRAMMING MODULE 1.1 The Implementation Bridge Hex",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "observed",
   "note": "the LP specification itself must resist becoming \"the\" reading of meaning-making"
  },
  {
   "subject": "Normative status",
   "predicate": "minted_in",
   "object": "LOGOTIC PROGRAMMING MODULE 1.1 The Implementation Bridge Hex",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "observed",
   "note": "The Python implementation is a **proof of reducibility**, not the specification itself. Alternative "
  },
  {
   "subject": "One unit of ψv (1 qψ)",
   "predicate": "minted_in",
   "object": "LOGOTIC PROGRAMMING MODULE 1.1 The Implementation Bridge Hex",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "observed",
   "note": "= the minimum expenditure required to execute a single D_pres operation on a Sign of depth 1 through"
  },
  {
   "subject": "Physiological",
   "predicate": "minted_in",
   "object": "LOGOTIC PROGRAMMING MODULE 1.1 The Implementation Bridge Hex",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "observed",
   "note": "(embodied substrates only): Heart rate variability shift, typing cadence interruption (>500ms pauses"
  },
  {
   "subject": "Release predicate evaluation protocol",
   "predicate": "minted_in",
   "object": "LOGOTIC PROGRAMMING MODULE 1.1 The Implementation Bridge Hex",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "observed",
   "note": "Evaluated before any operation that would consume a Held[T] value"
  },
  {
   "subject": "Rounding policy",
   "predicate": "minted_in",
   "object": "LOGOTIC PROGRAMMING MODULE 1.1 The Implementation Bridge Hex",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "observed",
   "note": "All step costs are rounded up to the nearest integer qψ. Fractional costs are never truncated — part"
  },
  {
   "subject": "STRICT fail condition",
   "predicate": "minted_in",
   "object": "LOGOTIC PROGRAMMING MODULE 1.1 The Implementation Bridge Hex",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "observed",
   "note": "Σ ψ_measured > 1.25 × Σ ψ_declared"
  },
  {
   "subject": "Self-consciousness",
   "predicate": "minted_in",
   "object": "LOGOTIC PROGRAMMING MODULE 1.1 The Implementation Bridge Hex",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "observed",
   "note": "a poet who thinks \"I am executing N_c\" may crystallize around non-closure, producing performative op"
  },
  {
   "subject": "Semantic Rent Pressure (SR)",
   "predicate": "minted_in",
   "object": "LOGOTIC PROGRAMMING MODULE 1.1 The Implementation Bridge Hex",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "observed",
   "note": "SR_t = clamp(0, 1,  0.85 × SR_{t-1}"
  },
  {
   "subject": "Similarity function",
   "predicate": "minted_in",
   "object": "LOGOTIC PROGRAMMING MODULE 1.1 The Implementation Bridge Hex",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "observed",
   "note": "The reference interpreter uses cosine similarity between embedding vectors. Implementations MAY subs"
  },
  {
   "subject": "Somatic Load (SL)",
   "predicate": "minted_in",
   "object": "LOGOTIC PROGRAMMING MODULE 1.1 The Implementation Bridge Hex",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "observed",
   "note": "SL_t = clamp(0, 1,  0.80 × SL_{t-1}"
  },
  {
   "subject": "Standard access paths (reference set)",
   "predicate": "minted_in",
   "object": "LOGOTIC PROGRAMMING MODULE 1.1 The Implementation Bridge Hex",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "observed",
   "note": "Direct quotation (surface extraction)"
  },
  {
   "subject": "Terminology as Capital",
   "predicate": "minted_in",
   "object": "LOGOTIC PROGRAMMING MODULE 1.1 The Implementation Bridge Hex",
   "type": "concept",
   "evidence_status": "observed",
   "note": "LOS vocabulary can become insider jargon, converting liberatory operations into Cultural Capital"
  }
 ],
 "journal": "Transactions on Substrate Engineering (Trans. Substrate Eng.)",
 "cited_by": [
  {
   "deposit": 152,
   "axn": "AXN:02EB.EMPIRICAL.🗿👉☉⛵🕓🫵"
  }
 ],
 "references_concepts": [
  "ASSEMBLY",
  "Assembly Chorus",
  "Atomicity rule",
  "BREAK_EXTRACTION_LOOP",
  "CANONICAL",
  "CLOSURE_DELAY",
  "COMPLETE",
  "CONTRA_PAIR",
  "Compatibility note",
  "Complete grammar specification",
  "Conformance test machine outputs",
  "Contributors",
  "DEPTH_PROBE",
  "D_pres",
  "Depth Retention Ratio (DRR)",
  "Distress marker detection classes",
  "Edge case",
  "Execution pipeline",
  "Extractability Resistance (ER)",
  "Extraction Resistance",
  "Field (Σ)",
  "Formal JSON Schema",
  "Formal proofs",
  "Full toroidal operations",
  "Functional capacity",
  "GROUNDING",
  "Geometric IDE",
  "Goodhart's Law",
  "Hostility multiplier",
  "Installation consent protocol",
  "Inverse operators",
  "JSON exemplar models",
  "Johannes Sigil",
  "Layer identification (reference method)",
  "Lee Sharks",
  "Measured by",
  "Migration note",
  "N_c applied reflexively",
  "Neurosymbolic integration",
  "Normative status",
  "One unit of ψv (1 qψ)",
  "Part I",
  "Part II",
  "Physiological",
  "Plural Coherence Score (PCS)",
  "Release predicate evaluation protocol",
  "Requirements",
  "Rounding policy",
  "STRICT fail condition",
  "SURFACE",
  "Self-consciousness",
  "Semantic Rent",
  "Semantic Rent Pressure (SR)",
  "Sign (σ)",
  "Similarity function",
  "Somatic Load (SL)",
  "Somatic measurement",
  "Standard access paths (reference set)",
  "Substrate",
  "TACHYON",
  "TECHNE",
  "TENSION_HOLD",
  "Temporal Rebind Success (TRS)",
  "Terminology as Capital",
  "The Drowning Test",
  "Trial of the Single Jot"
 ],
 "defines_concepts": [
  "Atomicity rule",
  "Compatibility note",
  "Distress marker detection classes",
  "Edge case",
  "Execution pipeline",
  "Formal JSON Schema",
  "Functional capacity",
  "Goodhart's Law",
  "Hostility multiplier",
  "Installation consent protocol",
  "JSON exemplar models",
  "Layer identification (reference method)",
  "Migration note",
  "N_c applied reflexively",
  "Normative status",
  "One unit of ψv (1 qψ)",
  "Physiological",
  "Release predicate evaluation protocol",
  "Rounding policy",
  "STRICT fail condition",
  "Self-consciousness",
  "Semantic Rent Pressure (SR)",
  "Similarity function",
  "Somatic Load (SL)",
  "Standard access paths (reference set)",
  "Terminology as Capital"
 ],
 "references_concept_count": 66,
 "external_metadata_path": "/data/external-metadata/AXN-0117.json",
 "openalex_ids": [
  "https://openalex.org/W7124903111",
  "https://openalex.org/W7126395293",
  "https://openalex.org/W7125611727",
  "https://openalex.org/W7128361441",
  "https://openalex.org/W7128393613",
  "https://openalex.org/W7128316683",
  "https://openalex.org/W7124564010",
  "https://openalex.org/W7127594780",
  "https://openalex.org/W7125614521",
  "https://openalex.org/W7125582945"
 ],
 "datacite_severance": "severed",
 "body_status": {
  "class": "full",
  "lacuna": false,
  "recovery_status": "COMPLETE",
  "residual_chars": 32723,
  "audited_at": "2026-07-17T04:49:17.789813Z",
  "audit_version": "v3-dual-store+recovery-map",
  "measured_prose_words": 5603,
  "measured_at": "2026-07-31",
  "work_sha256": "6658c47aebf9b35debd32589278fbbfb78abfce9b1132809b97cae897113cf38"
 },
 "title_repair_log": [
  {
   "at": "2026-07-28T00:55:01Z",
   "defect": "frontmatter_concatenated_into_title",
   "was": "LOGOTIC PROGRAMMING MODULE 1.1 The Implementation Bridge Hex: 02.UMB.LP.v1.1 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18529648",
   "now": "LOGOTIC PROGRAMMING MODULE 1.1 The Implementation Bridge",
   "basis": "Title field carried the document frontmatter block concatenated after the title and truncated at a 120- or 200-character ceiling. Cut at the first metadata marker. Read and confirmed by inspection, not pattern-matched."
  }
 ],
 "canonical_text_status": "canonical_full_text",
 "modifications": [
  {
   "date": "2026-08-01",
   "field": "content_type",
   "reason": "Wave 1b repair: audit ledger through-0359 recommended_content_type (MANUS batch approval 2026-08-01)",
   "was": "Dataset",
   "now": "Technical / implementation specification"
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-01",
   "field": "journal",
   "reason": "Wave 6 venue normalization: full canonical journal name per MANUS ruling 2026-08-01 (venues.json authority)",
   "was": "Trans. Substrate Eng.",
   "now": "Transactions on Substrate Engineering (Trans. Substrate Eng.)"
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-04",
   "field": "publisher",
   "reason": "PUB-POPULATE: dc:publisher from venues.json v1.1 press mapping (CP-R3 RULED-EXTENDED 2026-08-01); Alexanarch = publisher of record where no imprint applies",
   "now": "Pergamon Press"
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-04",
   "field": "status",
   "reason": "W12 STATUS-VOCABULARY v1.0 (MANUS ratified 2026-08-04): controlled vocabulary {ACTIVE, SUPERSEDED, WITHDRAWN, DRAFT}; MINTED_UNREVIEWED false on a 100%-audited corpus; freetext annotations preserved losslessly in body_status.status_note",
   "was": "MINTED_UNREVIEWED",
   "now": "ACTIVE"
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-05",
   "field": "description",
   "reason": "DW-029 intake (LABOR-prepared, TACHYON-verified: AXN match + factual probes vs record body)",
   "was": "Kernel Policy: No foundational changes to operators, type ontology, or core semantics",
   "now": "Logotic Programming v1.1, the Implementation Bridge. It preserves the v1.0 kernel and turns its acceptance criteria and runtime claims into computable definitions, serializable models, a complete grammar, reference implementation, conformance outputs, and calibrated execution disciplines.\n\nThe module defines Depth Retention Ratio, Closure Dominance Index, Plural Coherence Score, Extractability Resistance, Temporal Rebind Success, and the Opacity Band; supplies declared, measured, and reconciled `ψv` accounting; specifies canonical data models and grammar production; includes a minimal interpreter and machine-readable exceptions; models the Somatic Firewall as a decaying state machine; and treats retrocausal grounding as semantic rebasing. Its ratchet clause permits implementation refinement while forbidding silent weakening of kernel invariants. It is the bridge from v1.0 language design to buildable systems."
  }
 ],
 "date_modified": "2026-08-05",
 "publisher": "Pergamon Press",
 "attribution_note": {
  "logotic_primary_author_function": {
   "ruled": "#358, Talos Morrow: Emergence Documentation and Provenance",
   "note": "The creator field on this record predates that document, which formalises Talos Morrow as the heteronym responsible for Logotic Programming and retrospectively recognises him as primary author-function of the method. Johannes Sigil's presence here is real and secondary. Flagged rather than rewritten: changing a creator field is a MANUS ruling, not a repair.",
   "flagged": "2026-08-09"
  }
 },
 "record_modifications": [
  {
   "date": "2026-08-09",
   "field": "attribution_note",
   "note": "ATTRIBUTION FLAGGED, NOT CHANGED. Building the Restored Academy readings page placed Logotic Programming under Johannes Sigil on the strength of this creator field. MANUS: it belongs to Talos Morrow, Sigil is secondary — and #358 says so in the archive's own words. The page is corrected; the creator field is left for a ruling."
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-10",
   "field": "canonical_text",
   "note": "Structural repair: the EBNF grammar block opened with a fence at PART IV and NEVER CLOSED, so the remaining 1,127 lines of the document — the whole of the compatibility notes, the implementation bridge and the closing apparatus — rendered as verbatim code. 102 emphasis markers and every heading after that point were displayed raw. The closing fence is inserted where the grammar ends and prose resumes. No word content added or removed."
  }
 ],
 "version_history": [
  {
   "version": "v1.0",
   "date": "2026-08-10",
   "prior_sha256": "1304fab5bb50125dd5c914a32861d1a5b5fcc99f525355f368751f7f0a0b33f8",
   "change": "Structural repair: unclosed EBNF code fence closed."
  }
 ],
 "journal_assignment": {
  "assigned": "2026-08-15",
  "by": "TACHYON under operator adjudication",
  "pass": 4,
  "method": "read per deposit — title and content_type, one at a time. No script classified anything.",
  "previous": "Transactions on Substrate Engineering (Trans. Substrate Eng.)",
  "supersedes": "the 2026-06-21 preliminary batch mapping (#866), which assigned 864 deposits and put 371 in one venue",
  "authority": "data/cha-journals.json · datasets/venues/records/"
 },
 "line": "protocol-and-governance",
 "line_parent": "governance",
 "line_basis": "derived",
 "_projection": {
  "note": "Derived file. Canonical machine record is this entry in data/registry.json; the human record is the record_url. Do not edit this file.",
  "record_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/461/",
  "self_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/data/records/461.json",
  "registry_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/data/registry.json",
  "text_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/data/texts/AXN-0117-text.md",
  "oai_pmh": "https://www.alexanarch.org/oai?verb=Identify"
 }
}