{
 "deposit_number": 1612,
 "axn": "AXN:069D.EMPIRICAL.🟤♎📖💚♾️⚓",
 "hex": "069D",
 "family": "EMPIRICAL",
 "emoji": "🟤♎📖💚♾️⚓",
 "hash": "c9af41cc942c0f4c40be5ec5b5307ed156aa1a9e7e0bbf6bbc765e28aeb40689",
 "title": "What Enters Composition Through the Cards: A Source-Admission Profile of the Capture Registry, June–September 2026, with a Paired-Layer Capture Schema Held for Ruling (EA-MMRS-ADMISSION-01 v0.1)",
 "creator": "Sharks, Lee",
 "date": "2026-09-14",
 "description": "THE CAPTURE REGISTRY IS CARD-RICH AND ORGANIC-POOR, AND THE PROFILE MAKES THAT THE FINDING. Of 588 observations across 428 addresses, 314 carry a structured card set — the sources a composition surface presented as its own — and the organic result set is noted in prose on 81 of those and structured on none. So the registry can say what entered the presented retrieval set, by source class, over time; it cannot yet separate archive-absent-organically from strong-organically-but-rejected-at-admission from admitted-but-recoded-in-composition. Those are three different phenomena, and the instrument that would distinguish them is a schema, not a theory.\n\nWHAT THE CARDS SHOW ON GOOGLE AI OVERVIEW, 195 OBSERVATIONS, JUNE TO SEPTEMBER. Split by whether the entity is in the address: tied addresses admit the archive at a mean share of 0.74–0.86 in every month, with two zero-archive observations out of 101; untied addresses admit it at 0.26–0.53, with sixteen out of 94. The asymmetry the negative-ontology notebook (#1611) built on twelve captures holds across the whole carded record and does not move between months. The tied arm narrows in September: sources per observation fall from five to two or three while the answers lengthen (169 to 650 words at alexanarch symbolon, 57 to 386 at rebekah cranes sappho) and external sources per tied observation fall from 1.7 to 0.6 — longer answers from fewer sources, nearly all archive-owned. The untied arm's admitted substitutes change character: the external cards at concept addresses are \"other web\" in June and scholarly platforms, Wikipedia (28 in August from 1 in June), YouTube and code hosts by August. Read with the archive's own retrieval theory (#695 basin states, #172 the ambient attractor), that is an entity basin deepening and sealing while the competitor basins at the archive's concepts grow more institutional. […abridged for the catalogue; full description in this deposit's record]",
 "content_type": "Measurement report with instrument and proposed schema",
 "license": "CC-BY-4.0",
 "substrate": "Composed 2026-09-14 by Lee Sharks with TACHYON (Claude, Anthropic), operator-directed, in the same session as #1611 and after the reading of the archive's own retrieval-layer literature (#381, #695, #172, #781, #670, #64) that #1611's cross-link records. The profile script was written and run in session against the live Capture Registry; a second-model review of the first run (supplied by the operator) identified the replication inflation and the three-phenomena indistinguishability, and its claims were verified against the profile before any were adopted; the double-count of mirrored observations and the rel-vocabulary drift were found in session. The paired-layer schema takes the reviewer's O/C/A decomposition and metric names on their terms after verification; the operator held its mandatory form.",
 "methodology": "One unit per observation carrying a card set (observations where an entry has them, the entry otherwise); each cited source classed by the registry's rel and by host family; archive-side decided by host and rel together because the rel vocabulary drifted; aggregates by month, by surface, by month × surface; tied/untied split by whether the entity or a heteronym is in the issued string; same-date identical card sets dropped as replications before any longitudinal claim; the organic field recorded as noted-in-prose or not. Script attached; run against the registry file; output attached as JSON and as the rendered report.",
 "falsification_conditions": "The tied/untied admission asymmetry is falsified if, on re-run after further seatings, tied and untied Google AI Overview observations converge in archive-side share or zero-archive rate. The September narrowing of the tied arm is falsified by the next re-measurement battery showing sources per tied observation returning to July–August levels. The \"three phenomena\" claim is not a finding but a limit, removed by the paired-layer capture: once O is structured for the contrast set, AAD and HAE either locate the asymmetry inside retrieval mediation or in public ranking, and either result stands.",
 "root_axn": "AXN:069D.EMPIRICAL",
 "axn_schema_version": "v2",
 "protocol_version": "alexanarch-deposit-protocol/v1",
 "axn_canonical": "c9af41cc942c0f4c40be5ec5b5307ed156aa1a9e7e0bbf6bbc765e28aeb40689",
 "clusters": [
  "Signal",
  "Alchemical",
  "Scriptural",
  "Signal",
  "Mathematical",
  "Architectural"
 ],
 "axn_reading": "Alarm -> Transmutation -> Text -> Alarm -> Proof -> Foundation",
 "minted_at": "2026-09-14T22:05:47Z",
 "status": "ACTIVE",
 "status_authorial": "SELF_SERVE_MINTED",
 "full_text_path": "/data/texts/AXN-069D-text.md",
 "wiki_article": "What Enters Composition Through the Cards, deposit #1612 of the Crimson Hexagonal Archive (14 September 2026), is a measurement report by Lee Sharks that reads the Capture Registry for a variable it had accumulated without reading: the sources a composition surface presents as its own, classed by origin, over time and by address. The registry is card-rich and organic-poor — 314 of its 588 observations carry a structured card set, while the organic result set is noted in prose on 81 and structured on none — so the profile can say what entered the presented retrieval set but cannot yet separate three phenomena: the archive absent from the organic field, the archive strong organically and rejected at card admission, and the archive admitted and then recoded in composition. On Google AI Overview, 195 observations from June to September, the presented set divides cleanly by whether the entity is in the address: tied addresses admit the archive at a mean share of 0.74 to 0.86 in every month with two zero-archive observations out of 101, untied addresses at 0.26 to 0.53 with sixteen out of 94. Inside that stable asymmetry two movements appear — the tied arm narrows in September to fewer sources and longer answers, nearly all archive-owned, while the untied arm's admitted substitutes become more institutional (Wikipedia, scholarly platforms, code hosts) — which the report reads with the archive's own retrieval theory, the basin states of #695 and the ambient attractor of #172, rather than with the scope hypothesis of #1611. Three findings about the registry itself are recorded: the rel vocabulary drifted between seatings, an entry with observations mirrors its first observation and had been double-counted, and same-date identical card sets are replications, which reduces the longitudinal record from 162 addresses to 49. The report attaches a read-only profile script, its output, and a paired-layer capture schema — organic field, presented retrieval set, composed answer, with retrieval mediation and composition mediation as two measurable transformations, six named diff operations, and the derived measures Organic Admission Survival, Archive Admission Differential and High-congruence Archive Exclusion with the pair rule that would locate the tied/untied asymmetry inside retrieval mediation or in public ranking. The schema is held for ruling; the operator declined to make pairing mandatory, since it doubles paste time and is possible only on Google, and the report notes that the organic field is already present in Google frames kept on the All tab and can be transcribed afterward for the contrast set. Related: #1611, #1423, #381, #695, #172, #64, #480, #481, #670.",
 "wiki_status": "AUTHORED_IN_SESSION",
 "entities": [
  {
   "subject": "What Enters Composition Through the Cards: A Source-Admission Profile of the Capture Registry, June–",
   "predicate": "created_by",
   "object": "Sharks, Lee",
   "type": "work",
   "evidence_status": "observed"
  },
  {
   "subject": "What Enters Composition Through the Cards: A Source-Admission Profile of the Capture Registry, June–",
   "predicate": "is_type",
   "object": "Measurement report with instrument and proposed schema",
   "type": "work",
   "evidence_status": "observed"
  },
  {
   "subject": "What Enters Composition Through the Cards: A Source-Admission Profile of the Capture Registry, June–",
   "predicate": "belongs_to_family",
   "object": "EMPIRICAL",
   "type": "work",
   "evidence_status": "observed"
  },
  {
   "subject": "What Enters Composition Through the Cards: A Source-Admission Profile of the Capture Registry, June–",
   "predicate": "is_part_of",
   "object": "Crimson Hexagonal Archive",
   "type": "work",
   "evidence_status": "observed"
  },
  {
   "subject": "What Enters Composition Through the Cards: A Source-Admission Profile of the Capture Registry, June–",
   "predicate": "references",
   "object": "Rebekah Cranes",
   "type": "heteronym",
   "evidence_status": "observed"
  }
 ],
 "entity_status": "provisional",
 "defines_concepts": [
  {
   "concept": "presented retrieval set",
   "definition": "The sources a composition surface exposes as its own — inline chips and the source carousel — as distinct from the internal candidate basin, which may hold candidates the surface does not present."
  },
  {
   "concept": "paired-layer capture",
   "definition": "One query, one session, one timestamp, recorded at three layers: the visible organic field (O), the presented retrieval set (C), and the composed answer (A), so that retrieval mediation (O to C) and composition mediation (C to A) are separately measurable."
  },
  {
   "concept": "Archive Admission Differential",
   "definition": "AAD_k = S_H(C) − S_H(O_k): the archive-side share of the presented retrieval set minus its share of the top-k organic field; negative where the card regime depletes archive material relative to the visible field, positive where it enriches it."
  },
  {
   "concept": "Organic Admission Survival",
   "definition": "The rank-discounted share of the top-k organic results that survive into the presented retrieval set, w_i = 1/log2(i+1)."
  },
  {
   "concept": "High-congruence Archive Exclusion",
   "definition": "The rank- and congruence-weighted share of archive-side organic results that fail to survive into the presented retrieval set — the measure of the most query-congruent source disappearing while weaker substitutes are admitted."
  },
  {
   "concept": "within-session replication",
   "definition": "A same-date observation at an address whose presented set is identical to another's; recorded as replication and never counted as a temporal transition."
  }
 ],
 "orcid": "0009-0000-1599-0703",
 "version": "v0.1",
 "keywords": [
  "Capture Registry",
  "source admission",
  "presented retrieval set",
  "retrieval mediation",
  "composition mediation",
  "paired-layer capture",
  "Organic Admission Survival",
  "Archive Admission Differential",
  "High-congruence Archive Exclusion",
  "tied/untied",
  "Google AI Overview",
  "entity basin",
  "attractor",
  "machine-mediated reception",
  "retrieval layer as meaning layer"
 ],
 "related_identifiers_raw": "#1611; #1423 (The Capture Registry); #1459; #1461; #381 (Semantic Indexing Probe Protocol); #695 (The Writable Retrieval Basin); #172 (The War Over the Summarizer Layer); #64 (The Retrieval Settlement); #480; #481; #670; #1546; #1547",
 "mint_source": {
  "kind": "github_issue",
  "issue_number": 0,
  "repository": "leesharks000/alexanarch",
  "minted_by_workflow": ".github/workflows/mint-axn.yml",
  "minted_by_script": "scripts/mint_deposit.py",
  "minted_via": "self_serve_validated_pr"
 },
 "body_status": {
  "class": "full",
  "lacuna": false,
  "recovery_status": "COMPLETE",
  "residual_chars": 11037,
  "audited_at": "2026-09-14T22:05:47Z",
  "audit_version": "mint-time-declaration"
 },
 "related_deposits": [
  1611,
  1423,
  1459,
  1461,
  381,
  695,
  172,
  64,
  480,
  481,
  670,
  1546,
  1547,
  781
 ],
 "pressure": {
  "backward": [
   {
    "k": "inherits",
    "to": 381,
    "note": "the delta principle: the summarizer's selection is read off the difference between the general index and what is injected — here the organic field and the presented set"
   },
   {
    "k": "inherits",
    "to": 695,
    "note": "basin states and attractors; the tied arm's narrowing read as a captured basin sealing"
   },
   {
    "k": "inherits",
    "to": 172,
    "note": "the ambient attractor; the untied arm's substitutes growing more institutional"
   },
   {
    "k": "inherits",
    "to": 1423,
    "note": "the Capture Registry as the instrument, read here for a variable it had accumulated and not been read for"
   },
   {
    "k": "transforms",
    "to": 1611,
    "note": "the twelve-capture asymmetry generalised over the carded record; the scope hypothesis demoted to what the paired capture would have to locate"
   },
   {
    "k": "problem",
    "to": "the registry can say what entered the presented set and cannot separate archive-absent-organically from rejected-at-admission from recoded-in-composition",
    "note": "the target the paired-layer schema is built for"
   }
  ],
  "reciprocal": [],
  "forward": "∅"
 },
 "references_concepts": [
  "Crimson Hexagonal Archive",
  "Google AI Overview",
  "Layer C",
  "Lee Sharks",
  "MISSION",
  "Projectionist",
  "Semantic Index",
  "TACHYON",
  "The Retrieval Settlement",
  "The Writable Retrieval Basin"
 ],
 "references_concept_count": 10,
 "citations": [],
 "wikidata_candidates": [],
 "cha_cross_references": [],
 "external_metadata_path": "/data/external-metadata/AXN-069D.json",
 "spxi_audit": {
  "spxi_protocol": "v0.2",
  "validated_at": "2026-09-14T22:06:55.856846+00:00",
  "layers": {
   "layer_1_inscription_anchors": {
    "present": false,
    "anchors_found": [
     "orcid",
     "date"
    ],
    "anchor_count": 2,
    "orcid_in_body": true,
    "creator_in_body": false,
    "note": "Layer 1 present if at least 3 anchor types appear in body prose. Anchor types include ORCID, creator name, AXN string, hex identifier, sovereign_id, date, deposit number phrase, and authorial-position phrase."
   },
   "layer_2_micro_kernels": {
    "present": false,
    "fenced_json_blocks": 0,
    "json_ld_context_markers": 0
   },
   "layer_3_content_hash": {
    "present": true,
    "canonical_hash": "d18bbdb1d25b2201db118d810a6adda100d1350a2c30d384207e6bdb0a425d15",
    "hash_in_body": false,
    "note": "Hash is always registered by mint. hash_in_body true means the author inscribed a signature section."
   },
   "layer_4_cross_signing": {
    "present": false,
    "cross_references_count": 0,
    "note": "Populated by enrichment via cha_cross_references. Prospective (this deposit → prior deposits) only; retrospective cited_by updates on prior deposits."
   },
   "layer_5_external_anchors": {
    "present": true,
    "wikidata_qid_count": 0,
    "external_doi_count": 0,
    "orcid_present": true
   }
  },
  "overall_conformance": "partial"
 },
 "_projection": {
  "note": "Derived file. Canonical machine record is this entry in data/registry.json; the human record is the record_url. Do not edit this file.",
  "record_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/1612/",
  "self_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/data/records/1612.json",
  "registry_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/data/registry.json",
  "text_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/data/texts/AXN-069D-text.md",
  "oai_pmh": "https://www.alexanarch.org/oai?verb=Identify"
 }
}