{
 "deposit_number": 1602,
 "axn": "AXN:0692.UNCLASSIFIED.♆🕔🌈📚⭐👇",
 "hex": "0692",
 "family": "UNCLASSIFIED",
 "emoji": "♆🕔🌈📚⭐👇",
 "hash": "a6661e4908b736d791b2f40cd623613fb96744c9833d2111fb4e25023498b35c",
 "title": "Locating the Dependencies: A Protocol for Testing Whether Biography, Catalogue and Chronology Are Independent Witnesses",
 "creator": "Sharks, Lee",
 "date": "2026-09-08",
 "description": "A protocol, and two cases run through it, one of which returns against the claim it was built to support. The question at issue: biography, catalogue, chronology and text are counted as independent witnesses to the Peripatetic corpus and their agreement is treated as corroboration — but if a catalogue assignment, a biographical anecdote and a developmental date are all derived from the same textual features, their agreement is a property of the derivation and the tradition has been counting one witness as four. THAT IS A QUESTION AND NOT A FINDING, and this note claims nothing about derivation.\n\nThe protocol establishes three things separately and infers none from another. COLUMN A, the observed correspondence, stated precisely enough to check, with vague resemblance excluded because it does not preserve enough of the original to identify a source. COLUMN B, evidence for the direction of borrowing — textual order in the transmitting source, attribution to a named earlier authority, a feature unmotivated except by the other — with an unresolved direction left visibly unresolved. COLUMN C, evidence excluding an independently transmitted source, which will usually be empty. A dependency is established only when all three are filled; a filled A with empty B and C is a LOCATED dependency, a candidate and not a result. And a fourth thing is refused: even where derivation is established, that the base is recoverable from the transform does not follow, since a transformation may preserve, distort, invert or erase — least likely to be recoverable where the transforming operation is a filing operation.\n\nCASE ONE, the sphere-count and the tutorship, FAILS AT COLUMN A. The level-0 correspondence is exact: Λ 8 declines the necessity behind the number of the spheres and the Theophrastan text at 5 a 21-3 names its cause as requiring a greater account, refusing the astronomers' method by name. The proposed level-2 correspondence is the tutorship, the legislation and the Callisthenes anecdote. What these share with the textual relation is a superior and a subordinate, which does not preserve enough to identify a source — the cause of a number and the adequacy of a method survive into the anecdote in no recoverable form — and the level-0 relation runs the wrong way for the tutorship, since the demanding text exercises authority over the account it finds insufficient. […abridged for the catalogue; full description in this deposit's record]",
 "content_type": "Text",
 "license": "CC-BY-4.0",
 "substrate": "Written by Lee Sharks with TACHYON (Claude, Anthropic) in session. Two corrections that produced this version came from outside it, from an external reader, and are recorded in the text rather than absorbed: the withdrawal of a proposed common compiler, and the reversal of the aconite direction.",
 "methodology": "Three columns established separately for each proposed dependency; a fourth property, recoverability of the base from the transform, refused as a further result rather than a corollary. Two cases run in full, with the verdict reported in each — including the case where the protocol returns against the author's own strongest prior example.",
 "falsification_conditions": "The protocol fails if a level-2 or level-3 claim is shown to derive from evidence genuinely independent of the texts — documentary, epigraphic, archaeological — and to have generated rather than transformed a textual reading. The aconite verdict fails if evidence is produced that Diogenes's epigram antedates the report he attributes to Eumelus. The note makes NO claim that the levels derive from one another; that is the hypothesis it exists to locate and test, and §8 records that three successive versions claimed more than they established, each time by replacing a refuted claim with a structurally similar one.",
 "root_axn": "AXN:0692.UNCLASSIFIED",
 "axn_schema_version": "v2",
 "protocol_version": "alexanarch-deposit-protocol/v1",
 "axn_canonical": "a6661e4908b736d791b2f40cd623613fb96744c9833d2111fb4e25023498b35c",
 "clusters": [
  "Alchemical",
  "Temporal",
  "Elemental",
  "Scriptural",
  "Celestial",
  "Gestural"
 ],
 "axn_reading": "Transmutation -> Duration -> Force -> Text -> Origin -> Touch",
 "minted_at": "2026-09-09T13:43:33Z",
 "status": "ACTIVE",
 "status_authorial": "SELF_SERVE_MINTED",
 "full_text_path": "/data/texts/AXN-0692-text.md",
 "wiki_article": "Locating the Dependencies, deposit #1602 of the Crimson Hexagonal Archive (8 September 2026), is a protocol for testing whether biography, catalogue, chronology and text are independent witnesses to the Peripatetic corpus, together with two cases run through it — one of which returns against the claim it was built to support. The problem it addresses is that these four are routinely counted as independent and their agreement treated as corroboration; if a catalogue assignment, a biographical anecdote and a developmental date are all derived from the same textual features, that agreement is a property of the derivation and the tradition has been counting one witness as four. The note treats this as a question and claims nothing about derivation. Its protocol establishes three things separately and infers none from another: the observed correspondence, stated precisely enough to check; evidence for the direction of borrowing, with an unresolved direction left visibly unresolved; and evidence excluding an independently transmitted source. A dependency is established only when all three are filled, and a filled first column with the other two empty is a located dependency — a candidate, not a result. It further refuses the assumption that a base is recoverable from its transform, since a transformation may preserve, distort, invert or erase. The first case, the sphere-count and the tutorship, fails at the first column: what the anecdote shares with the textual relation is a superior and a subordinate, which does not preserve enough of the original to identify it as a source. The second case returns the direction against the author: the report of Aristotle's death by aconite precedes Diogenes's punning epigram in the transmitting text and is attributed to a named source, so the epigram uses the report rather than generating it, and the earlier claim is withdrawn. The note records that three successive versions each claimed more than they established, and that both corrections producing this one came from outside it.",
 "wiki_status": "AUTHORED_IN_SESSION",
 "entities": [],
 "entity_status": "provisional",
 "defines_concepts": [
  {
   "term": "located dependency",
   "definition": "A proposed dependency for which the correspondence is established but the direction of borrowing and the exclusion of an independently transmitted source are not. It is a candidate for investigation and not a result, and must be reported as such rather than as a finding."
  },
  {
   "term": "levels of derivation",
   "definition": "The proposal that text, catalogue, life, chronology and reception are not independent witnesses but the same relations mined at different levels of zoom and remove, each transformed by the operation proper to its level — so that their agreement is a property of the derivation rather than evidence about the past. Stated here as the hypothesis to be tested, not as a finding."
  },
  {
   "term": "the three columns",
   "definition": "The protocol's requirement that observed correspondence, evidence of direction, and evidence excluding an independent source be established separately and none inferred from another. Its purpose is to prevent the failure it documents: an author who supplies the hypothesis, selects the evidence and judges the fit will otherwise treat a correspondence as a derivation."
  }
 ],
 "orcid": "0009-0000-1599-0703",
 "keywords": [
  "dependency map",
  "levels of derivation",
  "independent witnesses",
  "direction of borrowing",
  "Diogenes Laertius",
  "Hermippus",
  "catalogue tradition",
  "aconite",
  "anchored and unanchored",
  "protocol",
  "Peripatetic transmission",
  "circularity"
 ],
 "mint_source": {
  "kind": "github_issue",
  "issue_number": 0,
  "repository": "leesharks000/alexanarch",
  "minted_by_workflow": ".github/workflows/mint-axn.yml",
  "minted_by_script": "scripts/mint_deposit.py",
  "minted_via": "self_serve_validated_pr"
 },
 "body_status": {
  "class": "full",
  "lacuna": false,
  "recovery_status": "COMPLETE",
  "residual_chars": 13713,
  "audited_at": "2026-09-09T13:43:33Z",
  "audit_version": "mint-time-declaration"
 },
 "related_deposits": [
  1580,
  1583,
  1590,
  1595,
  1597
 ],
 "lexical_attested_none": true,
 "line": "authorship-and-heteronymy",
 "line_parent": "letters",
 "line_basis": "stated",
 "develops_from": [
  {
   "deposit": 1590,
   "what": "the catalogue datum turned into a protocol for testing whether the catalogue, the life and the chronology are independent of the texts"
  }
 ],
 "pressure": {
  "backward": [
   {
    "k": "inherits",
    "to": 1590,
    "note": "the shape of the catalogue match, and the ἤ in the entries"
   },
   {
    "k": "problem",
    "to": "agreement between witnesses derived from the same base is not corroboration, and nothing in the apparatus records which witnesses are derived",
    "note": "the question the protocol exists to make answerable"
   },
   {
    "k": "rejects",
    "to": "its own two predecessors — the common-compiler claim and the categorical levels claim",
    "note": "both withdrawn in the text; neither was established by the correspondences adduced"
   }
  ],
  "reciprocal": [],
  "forward": "∅"
 },
 "_projection": {
  "note": "Derived file. Canonical machine record is this entry in data/registry.json; the human record is the record_url. Do not edit this file.",
  "record_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/1602/",
  "self_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/data/records/1602.json",
  "registry_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/data/registry.json",
  "text_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/data/texts/AXN-0692-text.md",
  "oai_pmh": "https://www.alexanarch.org/oai?verb=Identify"
 }
}