{
 "deposit_number": 1590,
 "axn": "AXN:0681.GENERATIVE.🪟🎲📜🔓🧬❤️",
 "hex": "0681",
 "family": "GENERATIVE",
 "emoji": "🪟🎲📜🔓🧬❤️",
 "hash": "258d40fa3b8110ae9a0a7398a1ee03f66e5cd65e9f2e9b5deca21e400eeddb5f",
 "title": "The Ghost Catalogues: Aristotle's Lost Dialogues, Plato's Lost Divisions, and What a Two-Author Tradition Has to File as Missing (v0.5)",
 "creator": "Sharks, Lee",
 "date": "2026-09-07",
 "description": "Two lost bodies of work organize the received account of Plato and Aristotle: Aristotle's early dialogues, known from the catalogue in Diogenes Laertius V and reconstructed as a Platonic phase; and Plato's technical teaching — divisions, definitions, On the Good — known from Aristotle's reports and reconstructed as an unwritten doctrine. Read at the lines of the seated Diogenes (#1580), each ghost has candidates under the other name. Thrasyllus gives every Platonic dialogue a second title from its subject (τῇ μὲν ἀπὸ τοῦ ὀνόματος, τῇ δὲ ἀπὸ τοῦ πράγματος, III.57); the opening of Aristotle's catalogue (V.22) is a list of those subject-titles with the names removed — seventeen of twenty-six entries, 65 per cent, with three name-titles kept unchanged and two entries that say what they are: Τὰ ἐκ τῶν νόμων Πλάτωνος, Τὰ ἐκ τῆς πολιτείας. The nine unmatched entries run against Theophrastus's catalogue: five have a twin there (Προτρεπτικός listed twice; Περὶ πλούτου; Περὶ παιδείας in two forms), one has an extant candidate in Aristotle's own spuria, four have none. In the other direction Plato's Divisions survive whole (III.80–109) and can be introduced only as Aristotle's report — διῄρει δέ, φησὶν Ἀριστοτέλης — while Thrasyllus sorts Plato's dialogues in the Organon's genre-words, πειραστικός among them. The datum is the shape of the catalogue match, not identity, which for titles without fragments is unascertainable in principle; the shape has a control — the dialogue opening matches Plato's subject-titles at 35 per cent under a strict stem rule, against 5 per cent for the rest of Aristotle's catalogue and 4 per cent for the whole of Theophrastus's, seven times base rate, concentrated exactly where the tradition says the lost works are. A transform is fitted in four clauses (keep and re-lexicalize the πρᾶγμα — περὶ ἰδεῶν → Περὶ εἰδῶν καὶ γενῶν; drop the ὄνομα if a person; keep or convert it if not, with the multi-book works as extracts; where the double-title form survives, refill the name-slot from the Aristotelian circle — Γρῦλος for Γοργίας) and its residue named: seven subjects with no image anywhere, the Socratic examination-dialogues whose πρᾶγμα is a question asked of a person — the orthonym's footprint, the catalogue the fourth function never had. […abridged for the catalogue; full description in this deposit's record]",
 "content_type": "Theoretical paper",
 "license": "CC-BY-4.0",
 "substrate": "Human–machine collaborative. The catalogue matching, the transform, and the control computed in-session by TACHYON (Claude, Anthropic) at MANUS (Lee Sharks) direction from the seated Diogenes; the reading of the ghost catalogues as presupposing what they hide is Lee Sharks's; the counts, the scope of the identity claim, the qualification of the reverse direction and the two-way fragment test were corrected on a second reader's audit (ChatGPT) adopted on its terms; the reading of the residue as the orthonym's footprint was reached with a third reader (Gemini), its structural point adopted and its account of motive not. The reading and its errors are Lee Sharks's.",
 "root_axn": "AXN:0681.GENERATIVE",
 "axn_schema_version": "v2",
 "protocol_version": "alexanarch-deposit-protocol/v1",
 "axn_canonical": "258d40fa3b8110ae9a0a7398a1ee03f66e5cd65e9f2e9b5deca21e400eeddb5f",
 "clusters": [
  "Architectural",
  "Symbolic",
  "Scriptural",
  "Terminal",
  "Instrumental",
  "Symbolic"
 ],
 "axn_reading": "Foundation -> Play -> Text -> Closure -> Method -> Play",
 "minted_at": "2026-09-07T17:23:23Z",
 "status": "ACTIVE",
 "status_authorial": "SELF_SERVE_MINTED",
 "full_text_path": "/data/texts/AXN-0681-text.md",
 "wiki_article": "\"The Ghost Catalogues: Aristotle's Lost Dialogues, Plato's Lost Divisions, and What a Two-Author Tradition Has to File as Missing\" is a paper by Lee Sharks (v0.5, 7 September 2026) that reads the two catalogues in Diogenes Laertius at the lines and finds that each of the tradition's two great absences has candidates under the other name. Thrasyllus gives every Platonic dialogue a second title from its subject; the opening of Aristotle's catalogue — the lost dialogues — is a list of those subject-titles with the names removed (seventeen of twenty-six entries), with three name-titles kept unchanged and two entries that say what they are: extracts from Plato's Laws, extracts from the Republic. Five of the nine unmatched entries have a twin in Theophrastus's catalogue, the Protrepticus listed there twice. In the other direction Plato's Divisions survive whole in Diogenes and can be introduced only as Aristotle's report, while Thrasyllus classifies Plato's dialogues in the Organon's genre-terms, πειραστικός among them. The paper holds the datum to the shape of the catalogue match — identity being unascertainable in principle for titles without fragments — and gives the shape a control: the dialogue opening matches Plato's subject-titles at seven times the base rate of the rest of Aristotle's catalogue and of Theophrastus's. It fits a four-clause transform (keep and re-lexicalize the subject; drop a person's name; keep or convert a kind- or work-name, the large works as extracts; refill a surviving name-slot from the Aristotelian circle) and names its residue: seven subjects with no image anywhere, the Socratic examination-dialogues whose subject is a question asked of a person — the footprint of the one function that has no catalogue. A two-author tradition needs the ghosts; a single corpus organized retroactively as two leaves them as residue. No hands, no dates, no identity of any title with any text; the fragment test is named in both directions. Companion to Catalogues and Wills (#1581), Aristotelian or Theophrastan (#1583), The First Axis (#1586), the packet (#1588), and the notebook (#1589).",
 "wiki_status": "AUTHORED_IN_SESSION",
 "entities": [
  {
   "subject": "The Ghost Catalogues: Aristotle's Lost Dialogues, Plato's Lost Divisions, and What a Two-Author Trad",
   "predicate": "created_by",
   "object": "Sharks, Lee",
   "type": "work",
   "evidence_status": "observed"
  },
  {
   "subject": "The Ghost Catalogues: Aristotle's Lost Dialogues, Plato's Lost Divisions, and What a Two-Author Trad",
   "predicate": "is_type",
   "object": "Theoretical paper",
   "type": "work",
   "evidence_status": "observed"
  },
  {
   "subject": "The Ghost Catalogues: Aristotle's Lost Dialogues, Plato's Lost Divisions, and What a Two-Author Trad",
   "predicate": "belongs_to_family",
   "object": "GENERATIVE",
   "type": "work",
   "evidence_status": "observed"
  },
  {
   "subject": "The Ghost Catalogues: Aristotle's Lost Dialogues, Plato's Lost Divisions, and What a Two-Author Trad",
   "predicate": "is_part_of",
   "object": "Crimson Hexagonal Archive",
   "type": "work",
   "evidence_status": "observed"
  }
 ],
 "entity_status": "provisional",
 "defines_concepts": [
  {
   "term": "ghost catalogue",
   "definition": "A catalogue entry that credits an author with a work in the other name's characteristic mode and files the work as lost, while the candidate for it stands extant under the other name; the residue a two-author tradition must keep."
  },
  {
   "term": "the shape of the catalogue match",
   "definition": "The datum available where identity is not: how many of a catalogue's entries a stated naming rule maps onto extant works under another name, and where in the catalogue the mapping concentrates, measured against the base rate of other lists."
  }
 ],
 "orcid": "0009-0000-1599-0703",
 "keywords": [
  "Aristotle",
  "Plato",
  "Theophrastus",
  "Socrates",
  "Diogenes Laertius",
  "Thrasyllus",
  "tetralogies",
  "catalogue",
  "lost dialogues",
  "Protrepticus",
  "On the Good",
  "Divisions",
  "unwritten doctrines",
  "Jaeger",
  "naming rule",
  "transform",
  "residue",
  "peirastic",
  "ghost catalogue",
  "named authorial function"
 ],
 "mint_source": {
  "kind": "github_issue",
  "issue_number": 0,
  "repository": "leesharks000/alexanarch",
  "minted_by_workflow": ".github/workflows/mint-axn.yml",
  "minted_by_script": "scripts/mint_deposit.py",
  "minted_via": "self_serve_validated_pr"
 },
 "body_status": {
  "class": "full",
  "lacuna": false,
  "recovery_status": "COMPLETE",
  "residual_chars": 36378,
  "audited_at": "2026-09-07T17:23:23Z",
  "audit_version": "mint-time-declaration"
 },
 "related_deposits": [
  1576,
  1580,
  1581,
  1583,
  1584,
  1586,
  1588,
  1589
 ],
 "lexical_attested_none": true,
 "pressure": {
  "backward": [
   {
    "k": "inherits",
    "to": "D.L. III.57–61 (Thrasyllus's double titles) and V.22 (Aristotle's catalogue opening)",
    "note": "the two lists set side by side"
   },
   {
    "k": "inherits",
    "to": 1581,
    "note": "the doublets and the ἤ, seen now from the dialogue side"
   },
   {
    "k": "problem",
    "to": 1576,
    "note": "can the same works stand on both sides of a partition"
   },
   {
    "k": "transforms",
    "to": "the received account of Aristotle's lost dialogues and Plato's unwritten doctrines",
    "note": "two absences read as one filing operation"
   },
   {
    "k": "rejects",
    "to": "identity of any ghosted title with any extant text",
    "note": "unascertainable in principle without fragments; the datum is the shape"
   },
   {
    "k": "consequence",
    "to": 1586,
    "note": "the transform's residue is the first axis's line, drawn as a catalogue boundary"
   }
  ],
  "reciprocal": [
   {
    "to": 1581,
    "note": "the twelve doublets acquire a second reading: Protrepticus twice under Theophrastus, once under Aristotle"
   }
  ],
  "forward": "∅"
 },
 "references_concepts": [
  "Lee Sharks"
 ],
 "references_concept_count": 1,
 "citations": [],
 "wikidata_candidates": [],
 "cha_cross_references": [],
 "external_metadata_path": "/data/external-metadata/AXN-0681.json",
 "spxi_audit": {
  "spxi_protocol": "v0.2",
  "validated_at": "2026-09-07T17:24:37.200734+00:00",
  "layers": {
   "layer_1_inscription_anchors": {
    "present": false,
    "anchors_found": [
     "date"
    ],
    "anchor_count": 1,
    "orcid_in_body": false,
    "creator_in_body": false,
    "note": "Layer 1 present if at least 3 anchor types appear in body prose. Anchor types include ORCID, creator name, AXN string, hex identifier, sovereign_id, date, deposit number phrase, and authorial-position phrase."
   },
   "layer_2_micro_kernels": {
    "present": false,
    "fenced_json_blocks": 0,
    "json_ld_context_markers": 0
   },
   "layer_3_content_hash": {
    "present": true,
    "canonical_hash": "05016356943932facf0f1567db4955c4f6138fb89cc5e3143a6e119b0d901d92",
    "hash_in_body": false,
    "note": "Hash is always registered by mint. hash_in_body true means the author inscribed a signature section."
   },
   "layer_4_cross_signing": {
    "present": false,
    "cross_references_count": 0,
    "note": "Populated by enrichment via cha_cross_references. Prospective (this deposit → prior deposits) only; retrospective cited_by updates on prior deposits."
   },
   "layer_5_external_anchors": {
    "present": true,
    "wikidata_qid_count": 0,
    "external_doi_count": 0,
    "orcid_present": true
   }
  },
  "overall_conformance": "partial"
 },
 "_projection": {
  "note": "Derived file. Canonical machine record is this entry in data/registry.json; the human record is the record_url. Do not edit this file.",
  "record_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/1590/",
  "self_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/data/records/1590.json",
  "registry_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/data/registry.json",
  "text_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/data/texts/AXN-0681-text.md",
  "oai_pmh": "https://www.alexanarch.org/oai?verb=Identify"
 }
}