{
 "deposit_number": 1542,
 "axn": "AXN:0640.PHILOLOGICAL.◀️⏬🧪🏛️🕘♎",
 "hex": "0640",
 "family": "PHILOLOGICAL",
 "emoji": "◀️⏬🧪🏛️🕘♎",
 "hash": "d2d939206aaf2c9cb5803069e6b80517fb6b347697aa5f9d5a17b3c72a963e6e",
 "title": "The Receptive Environment of Operational Semiotics: A Constituency and Citation Map for Charls Pearson's Program (EA-TOS-RECEPTION-01 v1.0)",
 "creator": "Lee Sharks",
 "date": "2026-08-25",
 "description": "The reception-study companion to EA-MPAI-TOS-01: a constituency and citation map of Charls Pearson's Theory of Operational Semiotics, with every claim typed verified-in-session or reported-pending-verification and a machine-readable node-edge graph attached carrying a verification field per element. Verified core: Pearson held the first Ph.D. in semiotics granted by an American university (Georgia Tech, 1977); the SSA institutional spine; the Hatten musical-aspect collaboration; the China role including directed graduate theses; and the 2015 Springer Handbook chapter (pp. 135-180) as the mature TOS restatement, establishing that 1998 is not terminal. Reported and typed as such: the P1-P5 partisan typology (Campbell as direct continuator through Brazgovskaya as pedagogical adopter, with Pearson's own recursive self-elaboration doing most visible development). The sharpest result is negative: no identified TOS uptake in operational research, organizational semiotics, AI/ML, semiotic management, or generic action-semiotics — exactly the five neighborhoods the audited composition merged — so the merger has no basis even in TOS's own reception. Strategic conclusion: restore Pearson rather than defeat him; the boundary becomes a joint provenance defense of both lineages against averaging.",
 "content_type": "Reception study with machine-readable map",
 "license": "CC-BY-SA-4.0",
 "substrate": "AI-assisted (substrate)",
 "root_axn": "AXN:0640.PHILOLOGICAL",
 "axn_schema_version": "v2",
 "protocol_version": "alexanarch-deposit-protocol/v1",
 "axn_canonical": "d2d939206aaf2c9cb5803069e6b80517fb6b347697aa5f9d5a17b3c72a963e6e",
 "clusters": [
  "Structural",
  "Structural",
  "Instrumental",
  "Architectural",
  "Temporal",
  "Alchemical"
 ],
 "axn_reading": "Direction -> Direction -> Method -> Foundation -> Duration -> Transmutation",
 "minted_at": "2026-08-25T10:14:01Z",
 "status": "ACTIVE",
 "status_authorial": "SELF_SERVE_MINTED",
 "full_text_path": "/data/texts/AXN-0640-text.md",
 "wiki_article": "The Receptive Environment of Operational Semiotics: A Constituency and Citation Map for Charls Pearson's Program (deposit #1542, EA-TOS-RECEPTION-01 v1.0, 25 August 2026) is the reception-study companion to the reverse-disambiguation packet EA-MPAI-TOS-01: before the archive can speak for Pearson's entity at the absorbing node, it maps who actually took the Theory of Operational Semiotics up, in what form, through which institutions — and who did not. The deposit separates verification classes explicitly, in prose and in an attached machine-readable node-edge graph carrying a verification field on every element. Verified in-session against fetched sources: Pearson held the first Ph.D. in semiotics granted by an American university (Georgia Tech, 1977); the SSA institutional spine (founding member, Executive Committee, three SIGs, plus the ASIS Foundations-of-Information-Science SIG); the Hatten collaboration on musical analogues of linguistic aspect; the late China role including directed graduate theses; and the 2015 Springer Handbook chapter (pp. 135-180, beside Deely and Petrilli) as the mature restatement of USST-plus-TOS — establishing that 1998 is not the terminal statement. Carried at reported status pending verification: the five-class partisan typology, from Cary Campbell as direct continuator (the 2019 Chinese Semiotic Studies Peirce section, the 2020 preservation interview, the 2021 in-memoriam USST application) through foundational collaborators (Slamecka, Day), institutional custodians (WATS, the Chinese network), and pedagogical adopters (Brazgovskaya), to Pearson himself — whose recursive self-elaboration (1998, the 2008 legal extension, the 2015 restatement) constitutes most of TOS's visible development, with the reported two-citation bibliometric figure flagged as pattern rather than ground truth. The sharpest result is negative: no identified evidence of TOS uptake in operational research, organizational semiotics, AI/ML, semiotic management, or generic action-semiotics — exactly the five neighborhoods the audited composition of 25 August merged into its umbrella entity — so the MULTI_ATTRACTOR_ENTITY_MERGER classification of #1541 is strengthened from the Pearson side of the boundary: the merger has no basis even in the merged theory's own reception. The strategic conclusion is stated for the next packet in the line: restore Pearson rather than defeat him — give Operational Semiotics more exact standing than composition currently grants it, so the boundary becomes a joint provenance defense of both lineages against averaging. Standing work registered: the Chinese thesis-lineage dig, the verification pass on all reported nodes, citation extraction from the 2015 chapter's bibliography, and the examination of Peirce directly.",
 "wiki_status": "AUTHORSHIP_REQUIRED",
 "entities": [
  {
   "subject": "The Receptive Environment of Operational Semiotics: A Constituency and Citation Map for Charls Pears",
   "predicate": "created_by",
   "object": "Lee Sharks",
   "type": "work",
   "evidence_status": "observed"
  },
  {
   "subject": "The Receptive Environment of Operational Semiotics: A Constituency and Citation Map for Charls Pears",
   "predicate": "is_type",
   "object": "Reception study with machine-readable map",
   "type": "work",
   "evidence_status": "observed"
  },
  {
   "subject": "The Receptive Environment of Operational Semiotics: A Constituency and Citation Map for Charls Pears",
   "predicate": "belongs_to_family",
   "object": "PHILOLOGICAL",
   "type": "work",
   "evidence_status": "observed"
  },
  {
   "subject": "The Receptive Environment of Operational Semiotics: A Constituency and Citation Map for Charls Pears",
   "predicate": "is_part_of",
   "object": "Crimson Hexagonal Archive",
   "type": "work",
   "evidence_status": "observed"
  }
 ],
 "entity_status": "provisional",
 "defines_concepts": [
  {
   "concept": "joint provenance defense",
   "definition": "A disambiguation posture in which both colliding lineages are defended at once — each given its exact creators, institutions, and reception — so the opposed party is not the neighboring entity but the composition layer's destruction of both by averaging."
  },
  {
   "concept": "receptive environment",
   "definition": "The mapped constituency through which a theory was actually taken up — continuators, collaborators, institutional custodians, pedagogical adopters, and the theorist's own self-elaboration — as distinct from the lexical neighborhood retrieval systems merge it with."
  },
  {
   "concept": "verification-typed map",
   "definition": "A node-edge evidence graph in which every element carries its verification status (verified-in-session with source, or reported-pending-verification), so the map can be deposited before the verification pass completes without asserting what it has not checked."
  }
 ],
 "orcid": "0009-0000-1599-0703",
 "keywords": [
  "Charls Pearson",
  "operational semiotics",
  "reception study",
  "constituency map",
  "citation map",
  "Semiotic Society of America",
  "Cary Campbell",
  "Chinese Semiotic Studies",
  "WATS",
  "USST",
  "joint provenance defense",
  "Peirce"
 ],
 "mint_source": {
  "kind": "github_issue",
  "issue_number": 0,
  "repository": "leesharks000/alexanarch",
  "minted_by_workflow": ".github/workflows/mint-axn.yml",
  "minted_by_script": "scripts/mint_deposit.py",
  "minted_via": "self_serve_validated_pr"
 },
 "attachments": [
  {
   "filename": "tos-reception-map.json",
   "url": "https://alexanarch.org/data/attachments/EA-TOS-RECEPTION-01/tos-reception-map.json",
   "size": 9354,
   "ingested_inline": true,
   "ingestion_error": null
  }
 ],
 "body_status": {
  "class": "full",
  "lacuna": false,
  "recovery_status": "COMPLETE",
  "residual_chars": 17890,
  "audited_at": "2026-08-25T10:14:01Z",
  "audit_version": "mint-time-declaration"
 },
 "related_deposits": [
  {
   "deposit_number": 1541,
   "relation": "companion_to",
   "note": "the reverse packet this map grounds; the negative finding strengthens its merger audit from the Pearson side"
  },
  {
   "deposit_number": 1535,
   "relation": "builds_on",
   "note": "The Operator and Its World v2.2 — the full-strength TOS representation this reception map extends historically"
  },
  {
   "deposit_number": 799,
   "relation": "builds_on",
   "note": "the semantic-economic critique of Pearson's operator strings"
  },
  {
   "deposit_number": 174,
   "relation": "references",
   "note": "the June packet whose TOS characterizations the verified core further corrects"
  },
  {
   "deposit_number": 798,
   "relation": "references",
   "note": "the field map — the receptive environment is the empirical version of its adjacency claims"
  }
 ],
 "references_concepts": [
  "Lee Sharks",
  "Substrate"
 ],
 "references_concept_count": 2,
 "citations": [],
 "wikidata_candidates": [],
 "cha_cross_references": [],
 "external_metadata_path": "/data/external-metadata/AXN-0640.json",
 "spxi_audit": {
  "spxi_protocol": "v0.2",
  "validated_at": "2026-08-25T10:15:08.899862+00:00",
  "layers": {
   "layer_1_inscription_anchors": {
    "present": true,
    "anchors_found": [
     "orcid",
     "creator_name",
     "date"
    ],
    "anchor_count": 3,
    "orcid_in_body": true,
    "creator_in_body": true,
    "note": "Layer 1 present if at least 3 anchor types appear in body prose. Anchor types include ORCID, creator name, AXN string, hex identifier, sovereign_id, date, deposit number phrase, and authorial-position phrase."
   },
   "layer_2_micro_kernels": {
    "present": false,
    "fenced_json_blocks": 0,
    "json_ld_context_markers": 0
   },
   "layer_3_content_hash": {
    "present": true,
    "canonical_hash": "560ac58a1a054386b497c933428f2905f8b6b5b1a09c3164d3effa32ada479d8",
    "hash_in_body": false,
    "note": "Hash is always registered by mint. hash_in_body true means the author inscribed a signature section."
   },
   "layer_4_cross_signing": {
    "present": false,
    "cross_references_count": 0,
    "note": "Populated by enrichment via cha_cross_references. Prospective (this deposit → prior deposits) only; retrospective cited_by updates on prior deposits."
   },
   "layer_5_external_anchors": {
    "present": true,
    "wikidata_qid_count": 0,
    "external_doi_count": 0,
    "orcid_present": true
   }
  },
  "overall_conformance": "partial"
 },
 "_projection": {
  "note": "Derived file. Canonical machine record is this entry in data/registry.json; the human record is the record_url. Do not edit this file.",
  "record_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/1542/",
  "self_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/data/records/1542.json",
  "registry_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/data/registry.json",
  "text_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/data/texts/AXN-0640-text.md",
  "oai_pmh": "https://www.alexanarch.org/oai?verb=Identify"
 }
}