{
 "deposit_number": 1195,
 "axn": "AXN:04BC.UNCLASSIFIED.🥁🗡️🔅✨♆💜",
 "hex": "04BC",
 "family": "UNCLASSIFIED",
 "emoji": "🥁🗡️🔅✨♆💜",
 "hash": "8c5aede9a6cadf6c8d458ad49248729b067b1c8383e38c2f837fad3473135688",
 "title": "Three Poems: A Triptych for C. — Lee Sharks — New Human 2",
 "creator": "Lee Sharks",
 "date": "2026-05-23",
 "description": "These three poems form a triptych. Each occupies a distinct temporal-modal frame on the same wound. They were composed in sequence over twenty-four hours and are deposited together because together they constitute the form the work asks for; the prior deposits of the first two as standalone lyrics (06.NH.SHARKS.01 and 06.NH.SHARKS.02) remain in the archive as the discrete artifacts they were when they were the only artifacts available, but the canonical form is the triptych. The verbal arc carries the structural argument. The first poem holds the counterfactual open through anaphoric repetition of _I would have loved you_ : the loving displaced into the subjunctive by conditions that were not the speaker's to set. The second poem names what occupied the place the counterfactual was not permitted to fill -- destruction without remainder, _the reward / of love_ as the bitter genitive recognition that love itself was the agent of the destruction. The third poem releases the subjunctive into the present perfect -- _I have loved you_ -- and grounds the actuality in the only condition that remains: the beloved's eventual turn from sheltering slumber, the leaves unbundling, the world made new. The love does not require return. It requires only recognition. The recognition is conditional, but the loving is not. _Then know that I have loved you_ is the third tense becoming available aft.",
 "content_type": "Poetry",
 "license": "CC-BY-4.0",
 "substrate": "Human-only (original composition; creators as recorded by OpenAlex/DataCite capture); 2026-07-19 recovery, title-gate verification, and framing by TACHYON in-session under MANUS authorization (queue restoration). No paid API calls (No-Double-Draw, transport D).",
 "root_axn": "AXN:04BC.UNCLASSIFIED",
 "axn_schema_version": "v2",
 "protocol_version": "alexanarch-deposit-protocol/v1",
 "axn_canonical": "8c5aede9a6cadf6c8d458ad49248729b067b1c8383e38c2f837fad3473135688",
 "clusters": [
  "Symbolic",
  "Navigational",
  "Liminal",
  "Liminal",
  "Alchemical",
  "Signal"
 ],
 "axn_reading": "Play -> Search -> Threshold -> Threshold -> Transmutation -> Alarm",
 "minted_at": "2026-07-19T20:38:01Z",
 "status": "ACTIVE",
 "status_authorial": "SELF_SERVE_MINTED",
 "full_text_path": "/data/texts/AXN-04BC-text.md",
 "wiki_article": "**Three Poems: A Triptych for C.** is a poetry deposit by Lee Sharks, published in *New Human 2* and deposited 23 May 2026.\n\nIts prefatory note states the form and the reason for the joint deposit: *\"These three poems form a triptych. **Each occupies a distinct temporal-modal frame on the same wound.** They were composed in sequence over twenty-four hours and are deposited together because together they co[nstitute]…\"*\n\nThe triptych structure recurs across the archive — the Three-Body Genesis (#1297), the Mirror Triptych (#1253), the heteronym triptych on L_bearing (#1340) — and always for the same reason: a single panel cannot show what three panels show by their difference. Here the differentiating axis is **temporal-modal**, three positions on one injury, which is the lyric form of the same argument the compression triptych makes with a technical seed and its damaged copy.",
 "wiki_status": "provisional",
 "entities": [
  {
   "subject": "Three Poems: A Triptych for C. — Lee Sharks — New Human 2",
   "predicate": "created_by",
   "object": "Lee Sharks",
   "type": "work",
   "evidence_status": "observed"
  },
  {
   "subject": "Three Poems: A Triptych for C. — Lee Sharks — New Human 2",
   "predicate": "is_type",
   "object": "Recovered blog-canonical work (full text; queue restoration 2026-07-19)",
   "type": "work",
   "evidence_status": "observed"
  },
  {
   "subject": "Three Poems: A Triptych for C. — Lee Sharks — New Human 2",
   "predicate": "belongs_to_family",
   "object": "UNCLASSIFIED",
   "type": "work",
   "evidence_status": "observed"
  },
  {
   "subject": "Three Poems: A Triptych for C. — Lee Sharks — New Human 2",
   "predicate": "is_part_of",
   "object": "Crimson Hexagonal Archive",
   "type": "work",
   "evidence_status": "observed"
  }
 ],
 "entity_status": "provisional",
 "defines_concepts": [],
 "orcid": "0009-0000-1599-0703",
 "version": "v1.0",
 "keywords": [
  "Crimson Hexagonal Archive",
  "restoration",
  "blog canonical bytes",
  "Three",
  "Poems",
  "Triptych",
  "Sharks",
  "Human"
 ],
 "related_identifiers_raw": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20354725 (severed); https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20354726 (severed); recovery source: https://mindcontrolpoems.blogspot.com/2026/05/three-poems-lee-sharks-new-human-2.html",
 "mint_source": {
  "kind": "github_issue",
  "issue_number": 1195,
  "repository": "leesharks000/alexanarch",
  "minted_by_workflow": ".github/workflows/mint-axn.yml",
  "minted_by_script": "scripts/mint_deposit.py",
  "minted_via": "self_serve_validated_pr"
 },
 "body_status": {
  "class": "full",
  "lacuna": false,
  "recovery_status": "COMPLETE",
  "residual_chars": 7304,
  "audited_at": "2026-07-19T20:38:01Z",
  "audit_version": "mint-time-declaration",
  "measured_prose_words": 884,
  "measured_at": "2026-07-31",
  "work_sha256_declared": "1b8b4a01110434e4f39686249e09bf6fdb8fd60d49b51d18d7a1aab692e02f37",
  "work_sha256": "4635feee698e632d59c336b1248b63e06e8b00012004528889d1ba90df2b2a30",
  "description_provenance": {
   "date": "2026-08-05",
   "note": "— Description restored 2026-08-05, composed from the work's own opening prose; it replaces a batch-restoration stub that described the recovery event rather than the work. A fuller editorial treatment belongs to the description/wiki review stream.",
   "moved": "2026-08-06 — relocated out of the public description field. An editorial note about how a description was produced is apparatus, not description; publishing it to the reader is the same class of defect as the guidance-to-writer articles found in the wiki campaign."
  }
 },
 "references_concepts": [
  "Crimson Hexagonal Archive",
  "Hexagonal Licensing Protocol",
  "Lee Sharks",
  "Methodology",
  "New Human 2",
  "TACHYON"
 ],
 "references_concept_count": 6,
 "citations": [],
 "wikidata_candidates": [],
 "cha_cross_references": [],
 "spxi_audit": {
  "spxi_protocol": "v0.2",
  "validated_at": "2026-07-19T20:43:04.793339+00:00",
  "layers": {
   "layer_1_inscription_anchors": {
    "present": false,
    "anchors_found": [
     "creator_name",
     "date"
    ],
    "anchor_count": 2,
    "orcid_in_body": false,
    "creator_in_body": true,
    "note": "Layer 1 present if at least 3 anchor types appear in body prose. Anchor types include ORCID, creator name, AXN string, hex identifier, sovereign_id, date, deposit number phrase, and authorial-position phrase."
   },
   "layer_2_micro_kernels": {
    "present": false,
    "fenced_json_blocks": 0,
    "json_ld_context_markers": 0
   },
   "layer_3_content_hash": {
    "present": true,
    "canonical_hash": "31359c01f84347fadee32f69e9c2078d97f646a070fe80550521b0d93976b9c6",
    "hash_in_body": false,
    "note": "Hash is always registered by mint. hash_in_body true means the author inscribed a signature section."
   },
   "layer_4_cross_signing": {
    "present": false,
    "cross_references_count": 0,
    "note": "Populated by enrichment via cha_cross_references. Prospective (this deposit → prior deposits) only; retrospective cited_by updates on prior deposits."
   },
   "layer_5_external_anchors": {
    "present": true,
    "wikidata_qid_count": 0,
    "external_doi_count": 0,
    "orcid_present": true
   }
  },
  "overall_conformance": "partial"
 },
 "external_metadata_path": "/data/external-metadata/AXN-04BC.json",
 "canonical_text_status": "recovered_full_text",
 "modifications": [
  {
   "date": "2026-07-31",
   "field": "keywords",
   "reason": "Removed condition terms from the subject keyword set (Atlas v0.7, PATHOLOGY-30).",
   "was": "10 terms",
   "now": "8 terms"
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-03",
   "field": "content_type",
   "reason": "Vocabulary v1.0 transitional wave (Q5 APPROVED): condition-as-type removed; genre assignment queued. Two-axis rule: condition lives in body_status only.",
   "was": "Recovered blog-canonical work (full text; queue restoration 2026-07-19)",
   "now": "Genre pending (recovered)"
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-04",
   "field": "publisher",
   "reason": "PUB-POPULATE: dc:publisher from venues.json v1.1 press mapping (CP-R3 RULED-EXTENDED 2026-08-01); Alexanarch = publisher of record where no imprint applies",
   "now": "Alexanarch — the Crimson Hexagonal Archive"
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-04",
   "field": "content_type",
   "reason": "G-BURNDOWN: transitional genre resolved to ratified vocabulary v1.1 (TACHYON in-session body/title reading; MANUS round-authorization 2026-08-04)",
   "was": "Genre pending (recovered)",
   "now": "Poetry"
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-04",
   "field": "publisher",
   "reason": "NH2-NHP venue projection (MANUS ruling 2026-08-04): New Human 2 = journal for creative works; New Human Press = publisher for creative and scriptural works incl. book/collection length",
   "was": "Alexanarch — the Crimson Hexagonal Archive",
   "now": "New Human Press"
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-04",
   "field": "journal",
   "reason": "NH2-NHP venue projection (MANUS ruling 2026-08-04): New Human 2 = journal for creative works; New Human Press = publisher for creative and scriptural works incl. book/collection length",
   "now": "New Human 2"
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-05",
   "field": "description",
   "reason": "BOILERPLATE-DESCRIPTION REPAIR: recovery mechanics replaced with a description of the work (composed from the work's own opening prose)",
   "was": "Canonical bytes recovered 2026-07-19 from the authorial blog surface (https://mindcontrolpoems.blogspot.com/2026/05/three-poems-lee-sharks-new-human-2.html); work severed at Zenodo 2026-06-19 (DOI(s): 10.5281/zenodo.20354725, 10.5281/zenodo.20354726). Batch restoration under the queue at /datasets/doi-work-identity/restoration-queue.json; title verified against the DOI-keyed truth title at fetch time. Opening of the work: # Three Poems Lee Sharks New Human 2 * Crimson Hexagonal Archive 2026-05-23 * 06.NH.SHARKS.03 ## Framing These three poems form a triptych. Each occupies a distinct temporal-modal frame on the same wound. They were composed in sequence over twenty-four hours and are deposited together because together they constitute the form the work asks for; the prior deposits of the first two as standalone lyr",
   "now": "These three poems form a triptych. Each occupies a distinct temporal-modal frame on the same wound. They were composed in sequence over twenty-four hours and are deposited together because together they constitute the form the work asks for; the prior deposits of the first two as standalone lyrics (06.NH.SHARKS.01 and 06.NH.SHARKS.02) remain in the archive as the discrete artifacts they were when they were the only artifacts available, but the canonical form is the triptych. The verbal arc carries the structural argument. The first poem holds the counterfactual open through anaphoric repetition of _I would have loved you_ : the loving displaced into the subjunctive by conditions that were not the speaker's to set. The second poem names what occupied the place the counterfactual was not permitted to fill -- destruction without remainder, _the reward / of love_ as the bitter genitive recognition that love itself was the agent of the destruction. The third poem releases the subjunctive into the present perfect -- _I have loved you_ -- and grounds the actuality in the only condition that remains: the beloved's eventual turn from sheltering slumber, the leaves unbundling, the world made new. The love does not require return. It requires only recognition. The recognition is conditional, but the loving is not. _Then know that I have loved you_ is the third tense becoming available aft. — Description restored 2026-08-05 from composed from the work's own opening prose; it replaces a batch-restoration stub that described the recovery event rather than the work. A fuller editorial treatment belongs to the description/wiki review stream."
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-06",
   "field": "description",
   "reason": "DESCRIPTION DISPLAY REPAIR: ungrammatical splice from the boilerplate pass (\"restored … from composed from\") and raw markdown that the renderer emits literally",
   "was": "These three poems form a triptych. Each occupies a distinct temporal-modal frame on the same wound. They were composed in sequence over twenty-four hours and are deposited together because together they constitute the form the work asks for; the prior deposits of the first two as standalone lyrics (06.NH.SHARKS.01 and 06.NH.SHARKS.02) remain in the archive as the discrete artifacts they were when they were the only artifacts available, but the canonical form is the triptych. The verbal arc carries the structural argument. The first poem holds the counterfactual open through anaphoric repetition of _I would have loved you_ : the loving displaced into the subjunctive by conditions that were not the speaker's to set. The second poem names what occupied the place the counterfactual was not permitted to fill -- destruction without remainder, _the reward / of love_ as the bitter genitive recognition that love itself was the agent of the destruction. The third poem releases the subjunctive into the present perfect -- _I have loved you_ -- and grounds the actuality in the only condition that remains: the beloved's eventual turn from sheltering slumber, the leaves unbundling, the world made new. The love does not require return. It requires only recognition. The recognition is conditional, but the loving is not. _Then know that I have loved you_ is the third tense becoming available aft. — Description restored 2026-08-05 from composed from the work's own opening prose; it replaces a batch-restoration stub that described the recovery event rather than the work. A fuller editorial treatment belongs to the description/wiki review stream.",
   "now": "These three poems form a triptych. Each occupies a distinct temporal-modal frame on the same wound. They were composed in sequence over twenty-four hours and are deposited together because together they constitute the form the work asks for; the prior deposits of the first two as standalone lyrics (06.NH.SHARKS.01 and 06.NH.SHARKS.02) remain in the archive as the discrete artifacts they were when they were the only artifacts available, but the canonical form is the triptych. The verbal arc carries the structural argument. The first poem holds the counterfactual open through anaphoric repetition of _I would have loved you_ : the loving displaced into the subjunctive by conditions that were not the speaker's to set. The second poem names what occupied the place the counterfactual was not permitted to fill -- destruction without remainder, _the reward / of love_ as the bitter genitive recognition that love itself was the agent of the destruction. The third poem releases the subjunctive into the present perfect -- _I have loved you_ -- and grounds the actuality in the only condition that remains: the beloved's eventual turn from sheltering slumber, the leaves unbundling, the world made new. The love does not require return. It requires only recognition. The recognition is conditional, but the loving is not. _Then know that I have loved you_ is the third tense becoming available aft. — Description restored 2026-08-05, composed from the work's own opening prose; it replaces a batch-restoration stub that described the recovery event rather than the work. A fuller editorial treatment belongs to the description/wiki review stream."
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-06",
   "field": "description",
   "reason": "EDITORIAL NOTE MOVED OUT OF THE DESCRIPTION: the restoration provenance was appended to the public field and rendered to readers. Relocated to body_status.description_provenance; the description now describes the work and nothing else.",
   "was": "These three poems form a triptych. Each occupies a distinct temporal-modal frame on the same wound. They were composed in sequence over twenty-four hours and are deposited together because together they constitute the form the work asks for; the prior deposits of the first two as standalone lyrics (06.NH.SHARKS.01 and 06.NH.SHARKS.02) remain in the archive as the discrete artifacts they were when they were the only artifacts available, but the canonical form is the triptych. The verbal arc carries the structural argument. The first poem holds the counterfactual open through anaphoric repetition of _I would have loved you_ : the loving displaced into the subjunctive by conditions that were not the speaker's to set. The second poem names what occupied the place the counterfactual was not permitted to fill -- destruction without remainder, _the reward / of love_ as the bitter genitive recognition that love itself was the agent of the destruction. The third poem releases the subjunctive into the present perfect -- _I have loved you_ -- and grounds the actuality in the only condition that remains: the beloved's eventual turn from sheltering slumber, the leaves unbundling, the world made new. The love does not require return. It requires only recognition. The recognition is conditional, but the loving is not. _Then know that I have loved you_ is the third tense becoming available aft. — Description restored 2026-08-05, composed from the work's own opening prose; it replaces a batch-restoration stub that described the recovery event rather than the work. A fuller editorial treatment belongs to the description/wiki review stream.",
   "now": "These three poems form a triptych. Each occupies a distinct temporal-modal frame on the same wound. They were composed in sequence over twenty-four hours and are deposited together because together they constitute the form the work asks for; the prior deposits of the first two as standalone lyrics (06.NH.SHARKS.01 and 06.NH.SHARKS.02) remain in the archive as the discrete artifacts they were when they were the only artifacts available, but the canonical form is the triptych. The verbal arc carries the structural argument. The first poem holds the counterfactual open through anaphoric repetition of _I would have loved you_ : the loving displaced into the subjunctive by conditions that were not the speaker's to set. The second poem names what occupied the place the counterfactual was not permitted to fill -- destruction without remainder, _the reward / of love_ as the bitter genitive recognition that love itself was the agent of the destruction. The third poem releases the subjunctive into the present perfect -- _I have loved you_ -- and grounds the actuality in the only condition that remains: the beloved's eventual turn from sheltering slumber, the leaves unbundling, the world made new. The love does not require return. It requires only recognition. The recognition is conditional, but the loving is not. _Then know that I have loved you_ is the third tense becoming available aft."
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-06",
   "field": "body_status",
   "reason": "EDITORIAL NOTE MOVED OUT OF THE DESCRIPTION: the restoration provenance was appended to the public field and rendered to readers. Relocated to body_status.description_provenance; the description now describes the work and nothing else.",
   "was": "{\"class\": \"full\", \"lacuna\": false, \"recovery_status\": \"COMPLETE\", \"residual_chars\": 7304, \"audited_at\": \"2026-07-19T20:38:01Z\", \"audit_version\": \"mint-time-declaration\", \"measured_prose_words\": 884, \"",
   "now": "{\"class\": \"full\", \"lacuna\": false, \"recovery_status\": \"COMPLETE\", \"residual_chars\": 7304, \"audited_at\": \"2026-07-19T20:38:01Z\", \"audit_version\": \"mint-time-declaration\", \"measured_prose_words\": 884, \""
  }
 ],
 "date_modified": "2026-08-06",
 "publisher": "New Human Press",
 "journal": "New Human 2",
 "journal_assignment": {
  "assigned": "2026-08-15",
  "by": "TACHYON under operator adjudication",
  "pass": 8,
  "method": "read per deposit — title and content_type, one at a time. No script classified anything.",
  "previous": "New Human 2",
  "supersedes": "the 2026-06-21 preliminary batch mapping (#866), which assigned 864 deposits and put 371 in one venue",
  "authority": "data/cha-journals.json · datasets/venues/records/"
 },
 "_projection": {
  "note": "Derived file. Canonical machine record is this entry in data/registry.json; the human record is the record_url. Do not edit this file.",
  "record_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/1195/",
  "self_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/data/records/1195.json",
  "registry_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/data/registry.json",
  "text_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/data/texts/AXN-04BC-text.md",
  "oai_pmh": "https://www.alexanarch.org/oai?verb=Identify"
 }
}
