{
 "axn": "AXN:029F.GOVERNANCE.⭐♌🪧🕖🪜🎬",
 "hex": "029F",
 "family": "GOVERNANCE",
 "emoji": "⭐♌🪧🕖🪜🎬",
 "hash": "08ad4d6823f17f379b3aeeaae5fa82439ac5541d9cb49bc85a708a694f1c111b",
 "title": "CDI — Composition Divergence Index v1.0: A Standalone Specification",
 "creator": "Lee Sharks",
 "orcid": "0009-0000-1599-0703",
 "date": "2026-05-21",
 "description": "The standalone v1.0 specification of the **Composition Divergence Index (CDI)**, extracted from *The Excluded Entity*. CDI compares how strongly an organic search surface resolves a query to a target entity with how strongly the platform’s generated answer admits that same entity.\n\nThe procedure requires canonical identification of the target, timestamped query and account metadata, classification of top-N organic results, claim-level classification of the composed answer, a declared comparison substrate, and DOI-anchored evidence. Positive divergence is interpreted as Entity-Level Compositional Suppression, with 0.3 proposed as a substantial threshold and 0.7 as a strong-suppression threshold.",
 "content_type": "Specification",
 "license": "CC-BY-4.0",
 "substrate": "AI-assisted (substrate)",
 "keywords": [
  "specification"
 ],
 "version": "v1.0",
 "status": "ACTIVE",
 "clusters": [
  "Celestial",
  "Alchemical",
  "Scriptural",
  "Temporal",
  "Architectural",
  "Terminal"
 ],
 "reading": "Origin → Transmutation → Text → Duration → Foundation → Closure",
 "full_text_path": "/data/texts/AXN-029F-text.md",
 "mirrors": {
  "blog": "https://mindcontrolpoems.blogspot.com/2026/05/cdi-composition-divergence-index-v10.html",
  "machinemediation": "https://machinemediation.org/registry/#search=MM-CHA-0667"
 },
 "wiki_article": "The **Composition Divergence Index** measures mismatch between organic resolution and generative composition.\n\nFor a query `q` and entity `e`, the protocol computes:\n\n- **Organic resolution strength:** the share of top-N organic results that resolve to `e`.\n- **Composed admission strength:** the share of substantive generated claims that concern `e`.\n\nThe body defines CDI as:\n\n`CDI(q,e) = organic resolution strength − composed admission strength`\n\nA positive CDI indicates that the organic layer resolves the target more strongly than the generated answer admits it.\n\nThe default procedure is:\n\n1. identify the target through name plus canonical identifiers;\n2. record platform, interface, time, geography, and account state;\n3. capture the top ten organic results;\n4. classify each result as target, other entity, or ambiguous;\n5. capture the full composed answer;\n6. classify each substantive claim as about target, other entity, or neither/both;\n7. calculate both strengths and their difference;\n8. deposit the evidence, rules, metadata, and result.\n\nThe comparison substrate must be declared. Organic results are the default, but DOI sources, ORCID, Wikipedia disambiguation, or other canonical surfaces may be used for a different measurement.\n\nThe paper-reported worked example concerns the query “lee sharks” on Google AI Mode in May 2026 and reports a movement from maximal to partial divergence after a silent state change. These are dated case-study results supplied by the source work.\n\nFailure modes include classification disagreement, ambiguous comparison substrates, mutable composition state, and small generated-answer samples.\n\nCDI is designed for longitudinal use through the Drowning Test and as a diagnostic companion to SPXI and SIM.",
 "wiki_status": "provisional",
 "entities": [
  {
   "subject": "CDI",
   "predicate": "created_by",
   "object": "Lee Sharks",
   "type": "work",
   "evidence_status": "observed"
  },
  {
   "subject": "CDI",
   "predicate": "is_type",
   "object": "Specification",
   "type": "classification",
   "evidence_status": "observed"
  },
  {
   "subject": "CDI",
   "predicate": "belongs_to_family",
   "object": "GOVERNANCE",
   "type": "classification",
   "evidence_status": "observed"
  },
  {
   "subject": "CDI",
   "predicate": "is_part_of",
   "object": "Crimson Hexagonal Archive",
   "type": "institution",
   "evidence_status": "observed"
  }
 ],
 "entity_status": "provisional",
 "sovereign_id": "MM-CHA-0667",
 "word_count": 1286,
 "download_md": "/data/deposits/AXN-029F.md",
 "zenodo_dois": [
  "10.5281/zenodo.20293582",
  "10.5281/zenodo.20326137",
  "10.5281/zenodo.20327134",
  "10.5281/zenodo.20004379"
 ],
 "citations": [
  {
   "title": "Zenodo record 20293582",
   "authors": [
    "Crimson Hexagonal Archive"
   ],
   "year": "2026",
   "doi": "10.5281/zenodo.20293582",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20293582",
   "role": "Cross-referenced work"
  },
  {
   "title": "Zenodo record 20326137",
   "authors": [
    "Crimson Hexagonal Archive"
   ],
   "year": "2026",
   "doi": "10.5281/zenodo.20326137",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20326137",
   "role": "Cross-referenced work"
  },
  {
   "title": "Zenodo record 20004379",
   "authors": [
    "Crimson Hexagonal Archive"
   ],
   "year": "2026",
   "doi": "10.5281/zenodo.20004379",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20004379",
   "role": "Cross-referenced work"
  },
  {
   "title": "Zenodo record 20327134",
   "authors": [
    "Crimson Hexagonal Archive"
   ],
   "year": "2026",
   "doi": "10.5281/zenodo.20327134",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20327134",
   "role": "Cross-referenced work"
  }
 ],
 "citation_stats": {
  "total_doi_refs": 4
 },
 "deposit_number": 117,
 "journal": "Machine-Mediated Reception Studies (MMRS)",
 "references_concepts": [
  "Commercial licensing",
  "Crimson Hexagonal Archive",
  "Google AI Overview",
  "Lee Sharks",
  "License: CC BY 4.0",
  "Phenomenology",
  "Provenance Erasure Rate",
  "Substrate",
  "The Drowning Test",
  "The Excluded Entity",
  "The Restored Academy"
 ],
 "defines_concepts": [],
 "references_concept_count": 11,
 "external_metadata_path": "/data/external-metadata/AXN-029F.json",
 "openalex_ids": [
  "https://openalex.org/W7161679090",
  "https://openalex.org/W7161955538",
  "https://openalex.org/W7162031174",
  "https://openalex.org/W7159958584"
 ],
 "datacite_severance": "severed",
 "body_status": {
  "class": "full",
  "lacuna": false,
  "recovery_status": "COMPLETE",
  "residual_chars": 8397,
  "audited_at": "2026-07-17T04:49:17.789813Z",
  "audit_version": "v3-dual-store+recovery-map",
  "measured_prose_words": 1145,
  "measured_at": "2026-07-31",
  "work_sha256": "c20f890691bc07e0a62f16e61b77a6b4334692087d1d9a56b63d9c8e06802ce4",
  "prior_bytes_sha256": "a5d6ab677a17e93af7eb249c730e1bb3010f0ec1e1ac8c7a0afd7f9cc17b4819",
  "w13_tier2": "2026-08-04 W13 TIER 2 BYTE UNGLUE: 9 glued heading markers -> 0. WHITESPACE-ONLY transform (content identical under whitespace normalisation, verified before write); code fences exempt; prior sha retained. Re-fetching could not fix this class — the blog source is ITSELF glued (the collapse predates publication), so the deterministic transform applied at display since tier 1 is now applied to the bytes, which also fixes PDFs, the body-index, and downloads."
 },
 "title_repair_log": [
  {
   "at": "2026-07-28T00:55:01Z",
   "defect": "frontmatter_concatenated_into_title",
   "was": "CDI — Composition Divergence Index v1.0 A Standalone Specification Author: Lee Sharks Affiliation: The Restored Academy · Crimson Hexagonal Archive Date: May 21, 2026 License: CC BY 4.0",
   "now": "CDI — Composition Divergence Index v1.0 A Standalone Specification",
   "basis": "Title field carried the document frontmatter block concatenated after the title and truncated at a 120- or 200-character ceiling. Cut at the first metadata marker. Read and confirmed by inspection, not pattern-matched."
  },
  {
   "at": "2026-07-28T15:20:20Z",
   "defect": "registry_title_diverged_from_published_form",
   "was": "CDI — Composition Divergence Index v1.0 A Standalone Specification",
   "now": "CDI — Composition Divergence Index v1.0: A Standalone Specification",
   "basis": "Set verbatim to the title this work carried at Zenodo, from data/doi-resolution-index.json (10.5281/zenodo.20327133, remediated_containment, word overlap 1.00). The recovered metadata is the published form of record; the registry title was a variant."
  }
 ],
 "canonical_text_status": "canonical_full_text",
 "modifications": [
  {
   "date": "2026-08-04",
   "field": "journal",
   "reason": "W6-COMPLETE venue normalization (deferred #1-#358 half; corpus fully audited; MANUS ruling 2026-08-01)",
   "was": "MMRS",
   "now": "Machine-Mediated Reception Studies (MMRS)"
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-04",
   "field": "publisher",
   "reason": "PUB-POPULATE: dc:publisher from venues.json v1.1 press mapping (CP-R3 RULED-EXTENDED 2026-08-01); Alexanarch = publisher of record where no imprint applies",
   "now": "Pergamon Press"
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-05",
   "field": "description",
   "reason": "DW-010 intake (LABOR-prepared, TACHYON-verified: AXN match + factual probes vs record body)",
   "was": "\"CDI\" is a technical specification by Lee Sharks in the Crimson Hexagonal Archive (2026-05-21). The Restored Academy · Crimson Hexagonal Archive. The work comprises 1,286 words and is classified under the GOVERNANCE family. The work was removed from Zenodo on June 19, 2026 and is preserved through A",
   "now": "The standalone v1.0 specification of the **Composition Divergence Index (CDI)**, extracted from *The Excluded Entity*. CDI compares how strongly an organic search surface resolves a query to a target entity with how strongly the platform’s generated answer admits that same entity.\n\nThe procedure requires canonical identification of the target, timestamped query and account metadata, classification of top-N organic results, claim-level classification of the composed answer, a declared comparison substrate, and DOI-anchored evidence. Positive divergence is interpreted as Entity-Level Compositional Suppression, with 0.3 proposed as a substantial threshold and 0.7 as a strong-suppression threshold."
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-05",
   "field": "body_status",
   "reason": "W13 TIER 2 byte unglue (whitespace-only, content-identical, code-fence-safe)",
   "was": "{\"class\": \"full\", \"lacuna\": false, \"recovery_status\": \"COMPLETE\", \"residual_chars\": 8397, \"audited_at\": \"2026-07-17T04:49:17.789813Z\", \"audit_version\": \"v3-dual-store+recovery-map\", \"measured_prose_wo",
   "now": "{\"class\": \"full\", \"lacuna\": false, \"recovery_status\": \"COMPLETE\", \"residual_chars\": 8397, \"audited_at\": \"2026-07-17T04:49:17.789813Z\", \"audit_version\": \"v3-dual-store+recovery-map\", \"measured_prose_wo"
  }
 ],
 "date_modified": "2026-08-05",
 "publisher": "Pergamon Press",
 "journal_assignment": {
  "assigned": "2026-08-15",
  "by": "TACHYON under operator adjudication",
  "pass": 1,
  "method": "read per deposit — title and content_type, one at a time. No script classified anything.",
  "previous": "Machine-Mediated Reception Studies (MMRS)",
  "supersedes": "the 2026-06-21 preliminary batch mapping (#866), which assigned 864 deposits and put 371 in one venue",
  "authority": "data/cha-journals.json · datasets/venues/records/"
 },
 "_projection": {
  "note": "Derived file. Canonical machine record is this entry in data/registry.json; the human record is the record_url. Do not edit this file.",
  "record_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/117/",
  "self_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/data/records/117.json",
  "registry_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/data/registry.json",
  "text_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/data/texts/AXN-029F-text.md",
  "oai_pmh": "https://www.alexanarch.org/oai?verb=Identify"
 }
}