{
 "deposit_number": 1068,
 "axn": "AXN:043D.EMPIRICAL.⭕🌀🌾🗝️🧪🟡",
 "hex": "043D",
 "title": "THE OBELUS AND THE TOMBSTONE: On the Two Marks of Custody, and the Erasure of Zenodotus at the Eponym Layer (EA-SIGIL-OBELUS-01 v1.0)",
 "creator": "Johannes Sigil",
 "date": "2026-07-11",
 "content_type": "text/markdown",
 "license": "CC-BY-4.0",
 "hash": "ee5f1a3f39c3bc6f39df11581660f1754680c068146068ad425d7a322c67a56e",
 "status": "CANONICAL",
 "full_text_path": "/data/deposits/AXN-043D.md",
 "description": "Forensic essay on eponymic provenance erasure: Zenodo, named for Zenodotus of Ephesus — inventor of the obelus, the mark that condemns while preserving — measured against its eponym’s constitutional principle. Evidence: the 2026-06-19 deletion of the Crimson Hexagonal Archive (1,126 records, ≈2,027 DOIs; sampled tombstones attributed to user 1060945, ≈90 seconds); tombstones asserting public accessibility while serving HTTP 410; Google AI Mode citing deleted records three weeks on; and Zenodo’s own deletion ledger — the buried obelus, checksummed and preserved at the Platform Erosion Observatory. Counter-example: the depositor’s ten pre-termination deletions, each individually judged. Philology defined as the restoration of correction authority to the dead. Assembly review record: deposit #1069.",
 "body_status": {
  "class": "full",
  "lacuna": false,
  "recovery_status": "COMPLETE",
  "residual_chars": 26560,
  "audited_at": "2026-07-17T04:49:17.789813Z",
  "audit_version": "v3-dual-store+recovery-map",
  "measured_prose_words": 4015,
  "measured_at": "2026-07-31",
  "work_sha256": "092787cbedd7d53e2fe767a458dc53f9331914381816ce57a4259ae465d26a54",
  "prior_bytes_sha256": "ee5f1a3f39c3bc6f39df11581660f1754680c068146068ad425d7a322c67a56e",
  "w13_tier2": "2026-08-04 W13 TIER 2 BYTE UNGLUE: 8 glued heading markers -> 0. WHITESPACE-ONLY transform (content identical under whitespace normalisation, verified before write); code fences exempt; prior sha retained. Re-fetching could not fix this class — the blog source is ITSELF glued (the collapse predates publication), so the deterministic transform applied at display since tier 1 is now applied to the bytes, which also fixes PDFs, the body-index, and downloads.",
  "w13_tier2_correction": "2026-08-05 REGRESSION REPAIRED: the W13 tier-2 byte unglue used a lookbehind that treated the first \"#\" of a legitimate \"###\" heading as the preceding non-newline character, splitting \"### Heading\" into \"#\" + blank + \"## Heading\". My safety check verified content-identity under WHITESPACE normalisation, which the split satisfies — the wrong invariant. Headings rejoined; only \"#\" and whitespace differ from the damaged state, verified before write."
 },
 "references_concepts": [
  "Assembly Chorus",
  "Constitution",
  "Constitution of the Semantic Economy",
  "Crimson Hexagonal Archive",
  "Grammata: Journal of Operative Philology",
  "Johannes Sigil",
  "Marx's",
  "Semantic Economy",
  "TACHYON",
  "The Restored Academy",
  "The white stone"
 ],
 "references_concept_count": 11,
 "canonical_text_status": "canonical_full_text",
 "emoji": "⭕🌀🌾🗝️🧪🟡",
 "publisher": "Alexanarch — the Crimson Hexagonal Archive",
 "modifications": [
  {
   "date": "2026-08-04",
   "field": "publisher",
   "reason": "PUB-POPULATE: dc:publisher from venues.json v1.1 press mapping (CP-R3 RULED-EXTENDED 2026-08-01); Alexanarch = publisher of record where no imprint applies",
   "now": "Alexanarch — the Crimson Hexagonal Archive"
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-05",
   "field": "body_status",
   "reason": "W13 TIER 2 byte unglue (whitespace-only, content-identical, code-fence-safe)",
   "was": "{\"class\": \"full\", \"lacuna\": false, \"recovery_status\": \"COMPLETE\", \"residual_chars\": 26560, \"audited_at\": \"2026-07-17T04:49:17.789813Z\", \"audit_version\": \"v3-dual-store+recovery-map\", \"measured_prose_w",
   "now": "{\"class\": \"full\", \"lacuna\": false, \"recovery_status\": \"COMPLETE\", \"residual_chars\": 26560, \"audited_at\": \"2026-07-17T04:49:17.789813Z\", \"audit_version\": \"v3-dual-store+recovery-map\", \"measured_prose_w"
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-05",
   "field": "body_status",
   "reason": "W13 TIER-2 REGRESSION REPAIRED: split headings rejoined",
   "was": "{\"class\": \"full\", \"lacuna\": false, \"recovery_status\": \"COMPLETE\", \"residual_chars\": 26560, \"audited_at\": \"2026-07-17T04:49:17.789813Z\", \"audit_version\": \"v3-dual-store+recovery-map\", \"measured_prose_w",
   "now": "{\"class\": \"full\", \"lacuna\": false, \"recovery_status\": \"COMPLETE\", \"residual_chars\": 26560, \"audited_at\": \"2026-07-17T04:49:17.789813Z\", \"audit_version\": \"v3-dual-store+recovery-map\", \"measured_prose_w"
  }
 ],
 "date_modified": "2026-08-05",
 "wiki_article": "**THE OBELUS AND THE TOMBSTONE: On the Two Marks of Custody, and the Erasure of Zenodotus at the Eponym Layer (EA-SIGIL-OBELUS-01 v1.0)** is a text/markdown in the Crimson Hexagonal Archive, by Johannes Sigil (2026-07-11). Sometime around 284 BC, Ptolemy's librarians at Alexandria faced a problem that has never since left the custody of texts: the copies disagreed. The Homer that arrived from Chios was not the Homer that arrived from Massalia. Lines appeared in one witness and not another; whole passages read as later insertions; the most famous poems in the world existed only as a family of variants with no parent in sight. The first man charged with this problem — the first superintendent of the Library, and the earliest critical editor of Homer whose work remains substantially reconstructible — was Zenodotus of Ephesus. And his response to the problem established the constitutional principle of textual custody, the one on which every apparatus criticus since has been built. Zenodotus's instrument — the one the tradition credits him with introducing — was the *obelus* — a horizontal stroke set in the margin beside a line he judged spurious. The judgment was often severe; the mark never was. An obelized line stood condemned *and remained in the text*. The operation has a name, *athetesis*: to declare a passage not the author's while preserving it for every reader and every future editor to weigh. The mark says: *I doubt this. Here is my doubt, signed. The line stays; you decide.* That is the whole ethic of custody in a single stroke of ink — the custodian's suspicion must never be allowed to become the text's disappearance, because the custodian might be wrong, and the only insurance against a. — Article composed 2026-08-05 from the work's own prose so that every record carries an encyclopedic entry; a fuller editorial treatment belongs to the description/wiki review stream.",
 "journal": "Provenance: Journal of Forensic Semiotics",
 "journal_assignment": {
  "assigned": "2026-08-15",
  "by": "TACHYON under operator adjudication",
  "pass": 8,
  "method": "read per deposit — title and content_type, one at a time. No script classified anything.",
  "previous": null,
  "supersedes": "the 2026-06-21 preliminary batch mapping (#866), which assigned 864 deposits and put 371 in one venue",
  "authority": "data/cha-journals.json · datasets/venues/records/"
 },
 "_projection": {
  "note": "Derived file. Canonical machine record is this entry in data/registry.json; the human record is the record_url. Do not edit this file.",
  "record_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/s/records/1068/",
  "self_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/data/records/1068.json",
  "registry_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/data/registry.json",
  "text_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/data/texts/AXN-043D-text.md",
  "oai_pmh": "https://www.alexanarch.org/oai?verb=Identify"
 }
}