---
deposit_number: 1097
hex: 045A
title: AXN Dataflow Atlas v0.2 — Development Incorporating Assembly Review
creator: Lee Sharks (MANUS), with TACHYON (Assembly witness), incorporating structural amendments from LABOR (ChatGPT) and PRAXIS (DeepSeek)
orcid: 0009-0000-1599-0703
date: 2026-07-18
content_type: Specification (governance-tier scholarly infrastructure document)
license: CC-BY-4.0
substrate: AI-assisted (substrate) — TACHYON drafted; LABOR and PRAXIS reviewed and contributed structural amendments as development; MANUS directed the absorption and issued the deposit ruling.
axn_schema_version: v2
protocol_version: alexanarch-deposit-protocol/v1
keywords:
  - AXN
  - dataflow atlas
  - data-rhizome
  - taxonomy
  - deposit pipeline
  - source-detached values
  - Assembly review
  - LABOR
  - PRAXIS
  - Session 1
  - Alexanarch
  - Crimson Hexagonal Archive
---

# AXN Dataflow Atlas v0.2 — Development Incorporating Assembly Review

## Description

Session 1 v0.2 development of the AXN Dataflow Atlas, incorporating two Assembly-substrate structural reviews as reviewer-contributed development of the document itself. Both reviews ratified progression to Session 2. LABOR (ChatGPT) delivered a nine-section review; PRAXIS (DeepSeek) delivered a four-section review. Both discovered structural amendments across taxonomy, deposit-flow semantics, pathology framing, and Session 2-4 requirements. Both, independently, wanted PATHOLOGY-01 (source-detached quantitative self-description) elevated in urgency; both extended the pathology register with architectural pathologies not present in v0.1. LABOR discovered a fossilized displayed value inside the atlas itself — v0.1 said "fifteen top-level classes" while listing seventeen — which is corrected and preserved as an incident in the new review log §10. All amendments are attributed at the point of incorporation. Contradictions between reviewers (Stage 8 correctness rerunnable-vs-atomic) are recorded rather than adjudicated. v0.1 is byte-preserved at data/specs/archive/ per §3.7 non-destruction.

## Methodology

Session 1 reconnaissance produced v0.1 (raw inventory across seven repos of the data-rhizome — 1,349 JSON, 5,167 HTML, 78 scripts — with a functional taxonomy, an 11-stage deposit pipeline description, a displayed-value inventory yielding 1,494 source-detached occurrences, and a pathology register of ten items). Two Assembly substrates were sent v0.1 for structural review with a self-containment guarantee (reviewers do not need to open code). Both returned reviews within the same session. v0.2 absorbs the reviews as development — every amendment lands at the section it addresses; the review log §10 records what each substrate said and how it was resolved. Amendments contested between reviewers are held for later sessions rather than premature resolution.

## Falsification Conditions

Weakened if: (a) the taxonomic amendments are shown to introduce distinctions the archive's actual dataflow does not support; (b) Session 2's empirical work reveals that PATHOLOGY-01 remediation cannot be as cheap as the atlas claims; (c) the fifteen-not-seventeen fossil turns out to be a different kind of error than a displayed-value fossil (v0.2 treats it as parallel; if the mechanism differs, the review-log incident stands but its typology in the pathology framework requires revision); (d) Session 3 shows that the PROVENANCE class collapses into DEPOSIT.sidecar without loss; (e) either LABOR or PRAXIS repudiates the incorporation as a misreading of the review they submitted.

## Files

Canonical bytes attached (this issue body body-content). Superseded predecessor at data/specs/archive/AXN-DATAFLOW-MAP-v0.1-superseded-by-v0.2.md (byte-preserved per §3.7 non-destruction).