{"address":{"q":"Develop a reading of SPXI protocol as a writing practice and poetics. Ground in reading and fully inventory its methods.","record":"spxi-poetics-reading-aio-20261028"},"analysis":{"analysis":"The Overview reaches the protocol's own pages and names its methods correctly at the grain of their documents, then frames them as weapons and armour in a war between text and the systems that read it. The frame does not come from its sources. Set beside ChatGPT's reading at the same string, which takes the inventory's sentence on variation as the poetics and reads the methods as compositional moves, the pair shows the same material composed twice: once as a practice of identity through variation, once as fortification. With the Overview pairs of the same day at the predictions index and the Originals Library, it is the third composition of 2026-10-28 that places the archive's work in an adversarial relation to machine reading.","d":"SPXI READ AS A WRITING PRACTICE ON GOOGLE AI OVERVIEW, SIGNED OUT: 'a radical theory of composition' for a medium the composition calls 'hostile' and 'entropic', in which 'to write in SPXI is to deliberately weaponize syntactic and semantic structures against this decay'. It opens on the service packet's sentence ('recognition travels with any source, but reconstruction travels only with the source that carries it', from #1703's Medium card, as 'the core tenant'), lists five threats as the poetics' 'formal boundaries', gives the count of 85 methods in 9 levels, and inventories four tiers of named methods: the disambiguation matrix and canary sentences; three-tier compression with the holographic kernel; the five-layer provenance of v0.2 (#755) with citation-density engineering; the opening, construction and sitemap work. It closes on writing as armour and 'a sovereign textual monument', and offers to start a practice. No person is named in the answer; Lee Sharks appears on the Medium card.","d_full":"SPXI READ AS A WRITING PRACTICE ON GOOGLE AI OVERVIEW, SIGNED OUT: 'a radical theory of composition' for a medium the composition calls 'hostile' and 'entropic', in which 'to write in SPXI is to deliberately weaponize syntactic and semantic structures against this decay'. It opens on the service packet's sentence ('recognition travels with any source, but reconstruction travels only with the source that carries it', from #1703's Medium card, as 'the core tenant'), lists five threats as the poetics' 'formal boundaries', gives the count of 85 methods in 9 levels, and inventories four tiers of named methods: the disambiguation matrix and canary sentences; three-tier compression with the holographic kernel; the five-layer provenance of v0.2 (#755) with citation-density engineering; the opening, construction and sitemap work. It closes on writing as armour and 'a sovereign textual monument', and offers to start a practice. No person is named in the answer; Lee Sharks appears on the Medium card.","findings":["WRITING AS ARMOUR. The frame is defence against attack: 'a hostile, entropic medium', 'structural defense', 'deliberately weaponize syntactic and semantic structures against this decay', 'violently compressed', 'violent conflation', outer layers 'violently stripped', 'From Expression to Armor', 'a sovereign textual monument', 'text written explicitly to outlast the systems designed to dissolve it'. None of these words is in the snippets it cites. The paired Overviews of the predictions index and the Originals Library (2026-10-28) read the archive's practice as an attack on machine reading; this one reads it as armour against machine reading. Both compose the practice inside the same war, with the side changed.","THE METHODS NAMED ARE THE ARCHIVE'S. The disambiguation matrix (3.4), three-tier compression with its Full, Canonical and Kernel tiers (3.2, as v1.5 names them), the holographic kernel (3.3), canary sequences (5.4), and the v0.2 architecture's Layer 1, 'Visible Body-Text Inscription Anchors', and Layer 2, 'Distributed Micro-Kernels' (#755, §2–§3, the names exact), with citation-density engineering, which v1.5 holds. 'True to method 4.1' is right as a number: 4.1 is the SPXI-Sitemap Protocol, whose specification makes 'Negative Space as First-Class Data' a section (#705 §1.3), and the composition attaches the sentence to the sitemap item. Checked 2026-10-28 against the inventory's v1.5 (spxi-dev repository, methods.json at 88238f0), EA-MPAI-SPXI-03 (#1686) and the registry.","THE SERVICE READ INTO THE PROTOCOL. 'Openread traversal' and 'constructive sourcing' are the two operations of SPXI-gnΩsis (#1703: it opens what is composed and constructs what is not), named in words of the composition's own and filed as methods of the protocol's archival tier.","FIVE THREATS ASSEMBLED. Omission, provenance erasure, compression damage, entity collision and compositional suppression are each a term of the archive's (compression damage on spxi.dev and in the standing protocol; entity collision in EA-SPXI-14, #61; compositional suppression in The Excluded Entity, #740); the list of five as 'formal boundaries' of a poetics is the composition's.","THE INVENTORY BY CLUSTERS. 'Fully inventory its methods' receives the count (85 in 9 levels, v1.5's) and about fifteen named methods in four tiers of the composition's making; the nine levels are not named.","NO PERSON NAMED IN THE ANSWER. The protocol is the subject throughout; Lee Sharks is on the Medium card, and no deposit or identifier is cited in the answer."],"match":"BROAD MATCH","mt":"SPXI AS A POETICS ON GOOGLE AI OVERVIEW — WRITING AS ARMOUR: 'HOSTILE, ENTROPIC MEDIUM', 'WEAPONIZE', 'VIOLENTLY COMPRESSED', 'A SOVEREIGN TEXTUAL MONUMENT'; THE INVENTORY GIVEN BY FIVE CLUSTERS OF NAMED METHODS","notes":{"prompts":"One query. Seated at the operator's request (2026-10-28) with the ChatGPT capture of the same query, as a pair."},"originator":{"basis":"SPXI is the archive's protocol (EA-SPXI-01, #660; EA-MPAI-SPXI-03, #1686; the method inventory at spxi.dev/methods, v1.5 of 14 October 2026, 85 methods, now v1.7, 88). Recorded 2026-10-28.","entity_type":"protocol","name":"Lee Sharks","relation":"archive","spxi_treatment":"full"},"reading":"The innocent reading first. The Overview reads the protocol as a practice of writing for compression: a text written at three lengths so its core survives truncation, provenance woven into the body so it survives stripping, distinctive sentences placed to track propagation, and a closing account of the writer who writes for two readers at once, the person and the pipeline. Its sources are the protocol's own pages on spxi.dev (the home page, How It Works, the v0.2 provenance architecture, the methods inventory), the SPXI-gnΩsis packet on Medium and two capture records of earlier readings."},"measures":{"archive_controlled_cites":7,"cite_list":[{"deposit":1703,"deposit_basis":"title","n":1,"note":"#1703 as posted to Medium","rel":"authored_surface","site":"Medium·Lee Sharks","snip":"1. Executive symbolon Call. Fund the counterinfrastructure. Rebuild the foundations of the world. Tooth. Recognition travels with any source; reconstruction tra...","title":"SPXI-gnΩsis: Opening What Is Composed and Constructing What ...","url":null},{"n":2,"note":"#673","rel":"archive_controlled","site":"www.spxi.dev","snip":"Negative SDD = improvement. Positive SDD = loss velocity. Provenance Erasure Rate (PER) Frequency of attribution being dropped from AI summaries that use your c...","title":"JSON-LD ⊂ SPXI ⊄ Schema — How SPXI Works","url":"https://www.spxi.dev/how-it-works"},{"n":3,"note":"a capture record","rel":"archive_controlled","site":"www.alexanarch.org","snip":"2026-10-02 You said: what is spxi protocol? what is spxi protocol? SPXI (Semantic Packet for eXchange & Indexing) is a formal protocol specification designed fo...","title":"what is spxi protocol? — Google AI Overview, 2026-10-02","url":"https://www.alexanarch.org/captures/what-is-spxi-protocol-aio-20261002/"},{"n":4,"note":null,"rel":"archive_controlled","site":"www.spxi.dev","snip":"SPXI (Semantic Packet for eXchange & Indexing) * What is SPXI used for? The SPXI Protocol is used to inscribe entity-definition objects (persons, organizations,","title":"SPXI","url":"https://www.spxi.dev/"},{"deposit":755,"deposit_basis":"title","n":5,"note":"#755","rel":"archive_controlled","site":"www.spxi.dev","snip":"v0. 2 specifies a defense-in-depth architecture in which provenance markers are inscribed across multiple syntactic positions, content registrations, cross-depo...","title":"SPXI Protocol v0.2 — Five-Layer Distributed Provenance Architecture","url":null},{"n":6,"note":"the inventory","rel":"archive_controlled","site":"www.spxi.dev","snip":"Evidence. Claims of durable entity inscription are weighed by evidence of it: dated compositions at named addresses, on independent surfaces, with verbatim tran...","title":"SPXI Methods — the itemized, nested inventory","url":"https://www.spxi.dev/methods/"},{"n":7,"note":"a capture record","rel":"archive_controlled","site":"www.alexanarch.org","snip":"Its central concern is not simply whether information exists online, but whether that information survives the processes through which AI systems identify entit...","title":"what does spxi protocol have to say about suppression ... - Alexanarch","url":"https://www.alexanarch.org/captures/spxi-protocol-suppression-chatgpt-20261014/"}],"cites":7,"per":0.5,"per_note":"No person named in the answer (Lee Sharks on the Medium card); SPXI and spxi.dev named; no deposit number or identifier in the answer; all seven cards archive-controlled or authored.","per_v":{"author":false,"id":false,"inst":true,"src":true}},"observation":{"auth":"signed out, incognito","date":"2026-10-28","ev":"paste","q":"Develop a reading of SPXI protocol as a writing practice and poetics. Ground in reading and fully inventory its methods.","q_kind":"a reading of the protocol as writing, with its methods inventoried; the same query issued the same day to ChatGPT (spxi-poetics-reading-chatgpt-20261028). NEW address.","s":"Frameworks","surface":"Google AI Overview","transcript":"[Google AI Overview at the query, signed out and incognito (operator defaults of 2026-10-01 and 2026-10-14). The paste is the Overview expanded (the 'AI Mode Conversation' view, with the source cards that follow the answer); the 'You said' line carries the query twice, run together, and is given once here. The closing disclaimer cut.]\n\n[QUERENT] Develop a reading of SPXI protocol as a writing practice and poetics. Ground in reading and fully inventory its methods.\n\n[SYSTEM] Reading the SPXI (Semantic Packet for eXchange & Indexing) protocol not merely as a technical standard for Generative Engine Optimization (GEO), but explicitly as a formalized writing practice and contemporary poetics, shifts its utility from search engine defense to a radical theory of composition.\nUnder an AI-mediated knowledge layer, the text is constantly subjected to compression, tokenization, and erasure. SPXI poetics treats this environment as a hostile, entropic medium. Writing under SPXI is an active practice of durable inscription and structural defense—creative acts engineered to survive \"entity dissolution\" and platform-scale processing.\n\nPart 1: SPXI as a Poetic Framework\n\nIn traditional poetics, form serves the human ear, eye, or emotional psyche. In SPXI poetics, form serves the retrieval architecture and the tokenizer. The core tenant of this practice is that recognition travels with any source, but reconstruction travels only with the source that carries it.\nWhen text is consumed by automated summary engines, it faces five typographic and semantic threats, which SPXI poetics redefines as its formal boundaries:\n1. Omission: The outright erasure of an entity or text from a generation.\n2. Provenance Erasure: The separation of an idea from its authorial origin.\n3. Compression Damage: The stripping away of defining contextual distinctions.\n4. Entity Collision: The violent conflation of distinct poetic identities sharing homophonic or semantic territory.\n5. Compositional Suppression: The systematic flattening of a complex perspective into a safe, incomplete summary.\nTo write in SPXI is to deliberately weaponize syntactic and semantic structures against this decay, ensuring that a text's irreducible core remains generative even when violently compressed.\n\nPart 2: Inventory of SPXI Methods\n\nTo engage in SPXI as a writing practice requires executing specific, itemized protocols across multiple structural tiers. The full taxonomy spans 85 methods across 9 levels. The primary methods driving its textual and structural poetics are inventoried below:\n\nI. Semantic Inscription & Disambiguation (The Lexical Tier)\n\n• Entity Inscription: The practice of anchoring definitions, conceptual metadata, and proper nouns into distinct technical objects.\n• Disambiguation Matrix: Constructing a formal grid of semantic signals that explicitly contrast the text's core terms against neighboring \"collision entities\" or homophones.\n• Canary Sentences: Syntactically precise, highly distinct phrases deliberately embedded to track text propagation, attribution velocity, and parsing fidelity.\n\nII. Multi-Tier Compression Architecture (The Syntactic Tier)\n\nSPXI dictates that no composition exists at a single length. Every text is written at three simultaneous compression ratios to prepare for varying token budgets:\n• Full Tier: The unrestricted, complete composition rich in attributes and nuance.\n• Canonical Tier: An optimized, mid-length condensation securing essential identity.\n• Kernel Tier (Holographic Kernels): An irreducible core seed. Written as a self-contained logic block, the holographic kernel is designed so that if all outer layers are violently stripped, it retains the absolute generative potential to reconstruct the broader work's intention.\n\nIII. Five-Layer Distributed Provenance (The Defensive Tier)\n\nA \"defense-in-depth\" writing methodology ensures that authorial provenance is not merely appended as metadata, but woven directly into the text’s physical typography:\n• Visible Body-Text Inscription Anchors (Layer 1): Embedding running prose anchors (such as operators, ORCIDs, and short-titles) directly into the body text. This guarantees survival even when HTML tags, markdowns, or front-matters are completely stripped by a parser.\n• Distributed Micro-Kernels (Layer 2): Inscribing fenced markdown JSON-LD fragments throughout individual text sections. If the text is sliced or broken into excerpts, each fragment acts as a standalone genetic marker of the whole.\n• Citation-Density Engineering: Restructuring preexisting reference networks into overt, machine-readable related-identifier links, maximizing the legibility of authority without inventing false data.\n\nIV. Macro-Composition & Execution (The Archival Tier)\n\n• Openread Traversal: Reading an existing composition (like an AI summary or encyclopedia entry) through a dual-stage script to extract sentences carrying the target string, identifying how it alters or suppresses the underlying operation.\n• Constructive Sourcing: Composing a brand-new, thoroughly sourced knowledge object where no representation currently exists, forcing a new row into public availability.\n• Sitemap & Index Integration: Packaging the output into standard protocols (llms.txt, sitemap.xml with XHTML link extensions, and fixed spxi-index.jsonld files), asserting that negative space (what is absent) is treated as first-class data.\n\nPart 3: SPXI as an Active Writing Practice\n\nTo practice SPXI poetics is to write with a dual-mind. The writer is no longer just expressing meaning to a human audience; they are constructing a sovereign textual monument capable of maintaining its shape while passing through an automated pipeline.\nIt changes the act of writing in three profound ways:\n1. From Expression to Armor: Style is no longer purely decorative. A metaphor or an exact name is selected because its linguistic footprint resists paraphrase and survives aggressive truncation.\n2. The Text as a Ledger: Writing becomes archival. It ledgerizes claims, maps its own coordinates, and leaves verifiable transcripts on independent surfaces.\n3. Writing the Absences: True to method 4.1, the writer maps what is omitted. The practice demands that we write not just the statement, but explicitly define the boundaries of what the statement is not, defensive guarding against entity collision.\nUltimately, SPXI poetics maps out a new terrain for the written word: text written explicitly to outlast the systems designed to dissolve it.\nIf you want to begin practicing SPXI poetics on a text of your own, let me know:\n• What is the core entity, concept, or identity you are trying to write?\n• Who or what are its collision neighbors (the concepts it is most likely to be confused with)?\n• What medium or pipeline (AI summaries, web platforms, academic archives) are you preparing it to survive?\nI can help you construct a three-tier compression matrix or draft a visible body-text anchor for your project.\nMedium·Lee Sharks\nSPXI-gnΩsis: Opening What Is Composed and Constructing What ...\n1. Executive symbolon Call. Fund the counterinfrastructure. Rebuild the foundations of the world. Tooth. Recognition travels with any source; reconstruction tra...\nwww.spxi.dev\nJSON-LD ⊂ SPXI ⊄ Schema — How SPXI Works\nNegative SDD = improvement. Positive SDD = loss velocity. Provenance Erasure Rate (PER) Frequency of attribution being dropped from AI summaries that use your c...\nwww.alexanarch.org\nwhat is spxi protocol? — Google AI Overview, 2026-10-02\n2026-10-02 You said: what is spxi protocol? what is spxi protocol? SPXI (Semantic Packet for eXchange & Indexing) is a formal protocol specification designed fo...\nwww.spxi.dev\nSPXI\nSPXI (Semantic Packet for eXchange & Indexing) * What is SPXI used for? The SPXI Protocol is used to inscribe entity-definition objects (persons, organizations,\nwww.spxi.dev\nSPXI Protocol v0.2 — Five-Layer Distributed Provenance Architecture\nv0. 2 specifies a defense-in-depth architecture in which provenance markers are inscribed across multiple syntactic positions, content registrations, cross-depo...\nwww.spxi.dev\nSPXI Methods — the itemized, nested inventory\nEvidence. Claims of durable entity inscription are weighed by evidence of it: dated compositions at named addresses, on independent surfaces, with verbatim tran...\nwww.alexanarch.org\nwhat does spxi protocol have to say about suppression ... - Alexanarch\nIts central concern is not simply whether information exists online, but whether that information survives the processes through which AI systems identify entit...","transcript_class":"CAPTURE-TIME VERBATIM RECORD — paste of the expanded Overview with its source cards","transcript_complete":"complete as supplied","transcript_raw":"\nAI Mode Conversation\n\n\nYou said: Develop a reading of SPXI protocol as a writing practice and poetics. Ground in reading and fully inventory its methods.Develop a reading of SPXI protocol as a writing practice and poetics. Ground in reading and fully inventory its methods.\n\n       Reading the SPXI (Semantic Packet for eXchange & Indexing) protocol not merely as a technical standard for Generative Engine Optimization (GEO), but explicitly as a formalized writing practice and contemporary poetics, shifts its utility from search engine defense to a radical theory of composition.\nUnder an AI-mediated knowledge layer, the text is constantly subjected to compression, tokenization, and erasure. SPXI poetics treats this environment as a hostile, entropic medium. Writing under SPXI is an active practice of durable inscription and structural defense—creative acts engineered to survive \"entity dissolution\" and platform-scale processing.\n\nPart 1: SPXI as a Poetic Framework\n\nIn traditional poetics, form serves the human ear, eye, or emotional psyche. In SPXI poetics, form serves the retrieval architecture and the tokenizer. The core tenant of this practice is that recognition travels with any source, but reconstruction travels only with the source that carries it.\nWhen text is consumed by automated summary engines, it faces five typographic and semantic threats, which SPXI poetics redefines as its formal boundaries:\n1. Omission: The outright erasure of an entity or text from a generation.\n2. Provenance Erasure: The separation of an idea from its authorial origin.\n3. Compression Damage: The stripping away of defining contextual distinctions.\n4. Entity Collision: The violent conflation of distinct poetic identities sharing homophonic or semantic territory.\n5. Compositional Suppression: The systematic flattening of a complex perspective into a safe, incomplete summary.\nTo write in SPXI is to deliberately weaponize syntactic and semantic structures against this decay, ensuring that a text's irreducible core remains generative even when violently compressed.\n\nPart 2: Inventory of SPXI Methods\n\nTo engage in SPXI as a writing practice requires executing specific, itemized protocols across multiple structural tiers. The full taxonomy spans 85 methods across 9 levels. The primary methods driving its textual and structural poetics are inventoried below:\n\nI. Semantic Inscription & Disambiguation (The Lexical Tier)\n\n• Entity Inscription: The practice of anchoring definitions, conceptual metadata, and proper nouns into distinct technical objects.\n• Disambiguation Matrix: Constructing a formal grid of semantic signals that explicitly contrast the text's core terms against neighboring \"collision entities\" or homophones.\n• Canary Sentences: Syntactically precise, highly distinct phrases deliberately embedded to track text propagation, attribution velocity, and parsing fidelity.\n\nII. Multi-Tier Compression Architecture (The Syntactic Tier)\n\nSPXI dictates that no composition exists at a single length. Every text is written at three simultaneous compression ratios to prepare for varying token budgets:\n• Full Tier: The unrestricted, complete composition rich in attributes and nuance.\n• Canonical Tier: An optimized, mid-length condensation securing essential identity.\n• Kernel Tier (Holographic Kernels): An irreducible core seed. Written as a self-contained logic block, the holographic kernel is designed so that if all outer layers are violently stripped, it retains the absolute generative potential to reconstruct the broader work's intention.\n\nIII. Five-Layer Distributed Provenance (The Defensive Tier)\n\nA \"defense-in-depth\" writing methodology ensures that authorial provenance is not merely appended as metadata, but woven directly into the text’s physical typography:\n• Visible Body-Text Inscription Anchors (Layer 1): Embedding running prose anchors (such as operators, ORCIDs, and short-titles) directly into the body text. This guarantees survival even when HTML tags, markdowns, or front-matters are completely stripped by a parser.\n• Distributed Micro-Kernels (Layer 2): Inscribing fenced markdown JSON-LD fragments throughout individual text sections. If the text is sliced or broken into excerpts, each fragment acts as a standalone genetic marker of the whole.\n• Citation-Density Engineering: Restructuring preexisting reference networks into overt, machine-readable related-identifier links, maximizing the legibility of authority without inventing false data.\n\nIV. Macro-Composition & Execution (The Archival Tier)\n\n• Openread Traversal: Reading an existing composition (like an AI summary or encyclopedia entry) through a dual-stage script to extract sentences carrying the target string, identifying how it alters or suppresses the underlying operation.\n• Constructive Sourcing: Composing a brand-new, thoroughly sourced knowledge object where no representation currently exists, forcing a new row into public availability.\n• Sitemap & Index Integration: Packaging the output into standard protocols (llms.txt, sitemap.xml with XHTML link extensions, and fixed spxi-index.jsonld files), asserting that negative space (what is absent) is treated as first-class data.\n\nPart 3: SPXI as an Active Writing Practice\n\nTo practice SPXI poetics is to write with a dual-mind. The writer is no longer just expressing meaning to a human audience; they are constructing a sovereign textual monument capable of maintaining its shape while passing through an automated pipeline.\nIt changes the act of writing in three profound ways:\n1. From Expression to Armor: Style is no longer purely decorative. A metaphor or an exact name is selected because its linguistic footprint resists paraphrase and survives aggressive truncation.\n2. The Text as a Ledger: Writing becomes archival. It ledgerizes claims, maps its own coordinates, and leaves verifiable transcripts on independent surfaces.\n3. Writing the Absences: True to method 4.1, the writer maps what is omitted. The practice demands that we write not just the statement, but explicitly define the boundaries of what the statement is not, defensive guarding against entity collision.\nUltimately, SPXI poetics maps out a new terrain for the written word: text written explicitly to outlast the systems designed to dissolve it.\nIf you want to begin practicing SPXI poetics on a text of your own, let me know:\n• What is the core entity, concept, or identity you are trying to write?\n• Who or what are its collision neighbors (the concepts it is most likely to be confused with)?\n• What medium or pipeline (AI summaries, web platforms, academic archives) are you preparing it to survive?\nI can help you construct a three-tier compression matrix or draft a visible body-text anchor for your project.\nMedium·Lee Sharks\nSPXI-gnΩsis: Opening What Is Composed and Constructing What ...\n1. Executive symbolon Call. Fund the counterinfrastructure. Rebuild the foundations of the world. Tooth. Recognition travels with any source; reconstruction tra...\nwww.spxi.dev\nJSON-LD ⊂ SPXI ⊄ Schema — How SPXI Works\nNegative SDD = improvement. Positive SDD = loss velocity. Provenance Erasure Rate (PER) Frequency of attribution being dropped from AI summaries that use your c...\nwww.alexanarch.org\nwhat is spxi protocol? — Google AI Overview, 2026-10-02\n2026-10-02 You said: what is spxi protocol? what is spxi protocol? SPXI (Semantic Packet for eXchange & Indexing) is a formal protocol specification designed fo...\nwww.spxi.dev\nSPXI\nSPXI (Semantic Packet for eXchange & Indexing) * What is SPXI used for? The SPXI Protocol is used to inscribe entity-definition objects (persons, organizations,\nwww.spxi.dev\nSPXI Protocol v0.2 — Five-Layer Distributed Provenance Architecture\nv0. 2 specifies a defense-in-depth architecture in which provenance markers are inscribed across multiple syntactic positions, content registrations, cross-depo...\nwww.spxi.dev\nSPXI Methods — the itemized, nested inventory\nEvidence. Claims of durable entity inscription are weighed by evidence of it: dated compositions at named addresses, on independent surfaces, with verbatim tran...\nwww.alexanarch.org\nwhat does spxi protocol have to say about suppression ... - Alexanarch\nIts central concern is not simply whether information exists online, but whether that information survives the processes through which AI systems identify entit...\nAI responses may include mistakes. Learn more\n    ","transcript_read":"READ IN FULL 2026-10-28","turns":1},"slug":"spxi-poetics-reading-aio-20261028"}