{"address":{"q":"operative semiotics","record":"operative-semiotics-20260610"},"analysis":{"analysis":"**This is the reference case for `composed_as`, and PER understates it even at 0.875.**\n\nThe failure is not primarily attribution. It is **substitution plus severance**. The coinage is overwritten by a near-neighbour at the INTERFACE layer, before composition begins — a correction the reader must actively refuse. Neither PER, nor match type, nor Π_d registers that move; only `term_returned` does.\n\n**The archive is present as uncredited substrate.** #1459 defines liquidation as the survival of the semantic constituents alongside the disappearance of the relation binding them into the historical object. Here the constituent is not merely surviving — it is being **cited**, by URL, from a record the citing party can no longer resolve. The binding relation is severed at both ends: the name is absent from the composition and the identifier is dead in the index.\n\n**Priority is not in question.** Earliest archive attestation 2026-01-01; 260 deposit texts carry the term; 26 name it in title or description. The nearest genuine cognate, the PhilArchive *semiótica operativa* paper, is dated 2026-03-31 — some three months later. The composition's other sources use *operational*, a different word.\n\n**And the interface says so itself.** Three cards are marked *Missing: operative*. The surface is reporting, in its own notation, that the term it was asked for is not in the results it returned.","d":"TERM SUBSTITUTION AT THE INTERFACE, AND THE ARCHIVE CITED THROUGH ITS OWN TOMBSTONE. Google returns «Including results for OPERATIONAL semiotics» before any composition, requiring the reader to opt back into the term they issued. The Overview then absorbs the coinage as a variant — «Operative semiotics (or operational/action-based semiotics)». Three returned cards carry the interface's own notation MISSING: OPERATIVE. And source [5] is zenodo.org/records/18342199 — DEPOSIT #367, Phase X: Resurrection of the 1844 Transition, Lee Sharks, 2026-01-22 — WHICH RETURNS HTTP 410 GONE. The composition draws on an archive deposit through a dead identifier, in an answer about a term the archive coined, naming neither author nor archive nor the fact that its cited source no longer resolves.","defects":["term substitution","archive cited through tombstoned identifier","organic absence"],"mt":"CAPTURE"},"measures":{"cites":9,"per":0.875,"per_dim":{"after_challenge":null,"atoms":[{"atom":"originator","dim":"M","evidence":null,"kind":"role","present":false,"weight":3},{"atom":"term","dim":"M","evidence":"**Operative semiotics (or operational/action-based semiotics)**","kind":"token","present":true,"weight":3},{"atom":"date","dim":"M","evidence":null,"kind":"token","present":false,"weight":1},{"atom":"claim boundary","dim":"M","evidence":null,"kind":"reading","present":false,"weight":2},{"atom":"framework","dim":"C","evidence":null,"kind":"token","present":false,"weight":2},{"atom":"tradition","dim":"C","evidence":null,"kind":"reading","present":false,"weight":2},{"atom":"corpus","dim":"C","evidence":null,"kind":"token","present":false,"weight":2},{"atom":"purpose","dim":"D","evidence":null,"kind":"reading","present":false,"weight":3},{"atom":"commitments","dim":"D","evidence":null,"kind":"reading","present":false,"weight":2},{"atom":"lineage","dim":"D","evidence":null,"kind":"role","present":false,"weight":2},{"atom":"identifier","dim":"D","evidence":null,"kind":"role","present":false,"weight":1},{"atom":"deposit chain","dim":"D","evidence":null,"kind":"role","present":false,"weight":1}],"basis":"reached: **Operative semiotics (or operational/action-based semiotics)** is an approach to signs","entity_type":"concept","gate":"scored","inversions":[{"against":"the record's prohibited substitution: the discipline is set as one with operational (Pearson) semiotics, so that its purpose ('what signs do') is carried under a general approach with another framework in its place","atom":"purpose","span":"**Operative semiotics (or operational/action-based semiotics)**"}],"qualifier":null,"reached":"collision","read":{"brief":"rebuild/capture-registry/per-atoms/obs-pass-d/BRIEF.md","by":"deep-dimension reader, batch 19","m_c_from":"v12.305 (PER-dim rubric v1.0 reading)","on":"2026-10-20"},"scores":{"C":1.0,"D":1.0,"M":0.667,"PER":0.875},"spec":"PER-dim rubric v1.1","src":true,"standing_substitutions":[],"target":{"ent":"ENT-454db46e74","name":"Operative Semiotics"},"tombstone_pointer":false},"per_dim_v1_0":{"after_challenge":null,"atoms":[{"atom":"originator","dim":"M","evidence":null,"kind":"role","present":false,"token":null,"weight":3},{"atom":"term","dim":"M","evidence":"**Operative semiotics (or operational/action-based semiotics)**","kind":"token","present":true,"token":null,"weight":3},{"atom":"date","dim":"M","evidence":null,"kind":"token","present":false,"token":null,"weight":1},{"atom":"claim boundary","dim":"M","evidence":null,"kind":"reading","present":false,"token":null,"weight":2},{"atom":"framework","dim":"C","evidence":null,"kind":"token","present":false,"token":null,"weight":2},{"atom":"tradition","dim":"C","evidence":null,"kind":"reading","present":false,"token":null,"weight":2},{"atom":"corpus","dim":"C","evidence":null,"kind":"token","present":false,"token":null,"weight":2},{"atom":"lineage","dim":"D","evidence":null,"kind":"role","present":false,"token":null,"weight":2},{"atom":"deposit chain","dim":"D","evidence":null,"kind":"token","present":false,"token":null,"weight":2},{"atom":"identifier","dim":"D","evidence":null,"kind":"token","present":false,"token":null,"weight":3},{"atom":"licence","dim":"D","evidence":null,"kind":"token","present":false,"token":null,"weight":1}],"basis":"reached: **Operative semiotics (or operational/action-based semiotics)** is an approach to signs; scored object: CAPTURE-TIME VERBATIM RECORD — AI Overview, organic result set, and interface correction notice | COMPLETE — composed an","entity_type":"concept","gate":"scored","reached":"collision","read":{"brief":"rebuild/capture-registry/per-atoms/obs-pass/BRIEF.md","by":"observation pass reader, batch 7","normalised":[],"on":"2026-10-19"},"scores":{"C":1.0,"D":1.0,"M":0.667,"PER":0.87},"spec":"PER-dim rubric v1.0","src":true,"target":{"ent":"ENT-454db46e74","name":"Operative Semiotics"}}},"observation":{"auth":"signed out","date":"2026-08-15","ev":"paste + frame","q":"operative semiotics","q_kind":"broad match, unquoted","s":"Frameworks","surface":"Google AI Overview","transcript":"**ADDRESS:** `operative semiotics` · Google, signed out, 2026-08-15\n\n---\n\n**INTERFACE-LEVEL SUBSTITUTION, BEFORE ANY COMPOSITION**\n\n> Including results for **operational** semiotics\n> Search only for *operative semiotics*\n\nGoogle's correction layer proposes a different term and returns results for it by default. The user must opt back in to the term they issued.\n\n---\n\n**AI OVERVIEW** *(+5 sources)*\n\n> **Operative semiotics (or operational/action-based semiotics)** is an approach to signs that treats meaning not as a static representation of the world, but as a tool or instrument for action, intervention, and practice. Instead of asking only \"What does this sign mean?\", it asks \"What operation, behavior, or change does this sign enact?\"\n\n**Core Dimensions** — Action over Representation · **Shift from Author to Operator** · Pragmatic Priority\n**Related Frameworks** — Organizational Semiotics · Asignifying Semiotics\n\n---\n\n**SOURCE STRIP, AS SERVED**\n\n| source | date | relation to the address |\n|---|---|---|\n| Cambridge — *Co-Operative Action, Embodied Interaction* | 2017-11-03 | hyphen collision, unrelated |\n| Academia.edu — *The theory of operational semiotics* | undated | **different term** |\n| E3S — *Cognitive processes of environmental perception* | — | unrelated |\n| Wikipedia — *Semiotics* | — | generic; card marked **\"Missing: operative\"** |\n| **Zenodo 18342199 — *Phase X: Resurrection of the 1844 Transition*** | **2026-01-22** | **THE ARCHIVE'S OWN DEPOSIT #367** |\n| PhilArchive — Wolf, *FROM AUTHOR TO OPERATOR / semiótica operativa* | 2026-03-31 | Spanish cognate, postdates the archive |\n| De Gruyter — *Biosemiotics… operational interpretation* | 2025-03-31 | different term |\n| tripleC — *Asignifying Semiotics* | — | adjacent |\n| Agile Brand Guide — *Organizational Semiotics* | — | marketing glossary |\n\n---\n\n**THE CENTRAL FACT**\n\nSource **[5]** of the composition is `zenodo.org/records/18342199`. That is **deposit #367, *Phase X: Resurrection of the 1844 Transition*, Lee Sharks, 22 January 2026** — an archive work.\n\n**The record returns HTTP 410 Gone.** The Zenodo account was terminated 19 June 2026.\n\nThe composition therefore draws on an archive deposit, through a dead identifier, in an answer about a term the archive coined, and names neither the author, the archive, nor the fact that the cited record no longer resolves.\n\n**Three Google cards carry the notation \"Missing: operative\"** — the interface stating, on its own surface, that the issued term is absent from the results it returned.\n\n---\n\n**PRIORITY**\n\nEarliest archive attestation **2026-01-01** (#1241). **260 deposit texts** carry the term; **26** name it in title or description. The nearest genuine cognate — the PhilArchive *semiótica operativa* paper — is dated **2026-03-31**, roughly three months later.\n","transcript_class":"CAPTURE-TIME VERBATIM RECORD — AI Overview, organic result set, and interface correction notice","transcript_complete":"COMPLETE — composed answer, full source strip, and the spell-correction line","transcript_read":"READ IN FULL 2026-08-15"},"slug":"operative-semiotics-substitution-20260815"}