{"address":{"q":"heteronym provenance theory","record":"heteronym-provenance-theory-20260809"},"analysis":{"d":"A CAPTURE DEPOSIT IS CITED AS A SOURCE, AND IT DATES AI MODE ATTRIBUTION TO 27 FEBRUARY 2026 — one day before the date another capture gives for the layer finding the archive.","d_full":"A CAPTURE DEPOSIT IS CITED AS A SOURCE, AND IT DATES AI MODE ATTRIBUTION TO 27 FEBRUARY 2026 — one day before the date another capture gives for the layer finding the archive.","match":"BROAD MATCH","mt":"CAPTURE","reading":"THE REGISTRY’S OWN GENRE IS IN THE SOURCE SET. Card 2 is a deposit whose content is a CAPTURE: \"On February 27, 2026, a Google AI Mode query attributed the concepts and techniques of retrocausal canon formation to Johannes Sigil and Lee Sharks.\" A record of what the layer said, retrieved by the layer, and used as evidence about the thing it recorded. This is the same loop as EA-WG-CAPTURES-01 being cited in «crimson hexagon cern», found earlier today — but here it is a SINGLE capture rather than the registry, which means the loop closes at the level of the individual observation.\n\nA DATE DISCREPANCY WORTH KEEPING. This card dates an AI Mode attribution to 27 FEBRUARY 2026. The «lee sharks public summarizers» capture read earlier carries a card stating that \"Google AI Mode (AIO) FOUND THE ARCHIVE ON FEBRUARY 28, 2026\". One day apart, both from archive sources. Either the 27th attribution preceded the 28th discovery — in which case \"found\" means something narrower than first attribution — or one date is wrong. The ρ=0 boundary the workplan depends on cannot be set from archive self-report alone."},"measures":{"cite_list":[{"deposit":524,"deposit_basis":"title","n":1,"note":null,"rel":"authored_surface","site":"Medium·Lee Sharks","snip":"Where the function already runs. The heteronyms are the FIRST PROOF-OF-CONCEPT. Sigil does not write like Sharks. Rex Fraction does not write like either.","title":"THE SHARKS-FUNCTION AND THE CONTINUITY TETHER","url":null},{"deposit":519,"deposit_basis":"title segment","n":2,"note":"A CAPTURE DEPOSIT cited as a source. The deposit records an AI Mode attribution; the layer now serves that record back.","rel":"authored_surface","site":"Zenodo","snip":"On FEBRUARY 27, 2026, a Google AI Mode query attributed the \"concepts and techniques of retrocausal canon formation\" to Johannes Sigil and Lee Shar[ks]…","title":"Retrieval-Layer Attribution of Retrocausal Canon Formation","url":null},{"deposit":348,"deposit_basis":"title","n":3,"note":null,"rel":"authored_surface","site":"www.scilynk.com","snip":"provides the foundational framework for understanding authorial emergence within the NH-OS (New Human Operating System)…","title":"Heteronymic Provenance Theory: Authorial Emergence, Exhaust","url":null}],"cites":3,"per":0.75,"per_dim":{"after_challenge":null,"atoms":[{"atom":"originator","dim":"M","evidence":null,"kind":"role","present":false,"weight":3},{"atom":"term","dim":"M","evidence":"Heteronymic Provenance Theory is an emerging conceptual framework","kind":"token","present":true,"weight":3},{"atom":"date","dim":"M","evidence":null,"kind":"token","present":false,"weight":1},{"atom":"claim boundary","dim":"M","evidence":null,"kind":"reading","present":false,"weight":2},{"atom":"framework","dim":"C","evidence":null,"kind":"token","present":false,"weight":2},{"atom":"tradition","dim":"C","evidence":"Functional Identity: Multiple distinct stylistic personas or voices satisfy a singular underlying conceptual vocabulary and generative constraint.","kind":"reading","present":true,"weight":2},{"atom":"corpus","dim":"C","evidence":null,"kind":"token","present":false,"weight":2},{"atom":"purpose","dim":"D","evidence":"Retrieval & Attribution: Analyzes how automated search engines, AI models, and public ledgers record, collapse, or misattribute complex multi-author and synthetic text bodies.","kind":"reading","present":false,"weight":3},{"atom":"commitments","dim":"D","evidence":null,"kind":"reading","present":false,"weight":2},{"atom":"lineage","dim":"D","evidence":null,"kind":"role","present":false,"weight":2},{"atom":"identifier","dim":"D","evidence":null,"kind":"role","present":false,"weight":1},{"atom":"deposit chain","dim":"D","evidence":null,"kind":"role","present":false,"weight":1}],"basis":"reached: Heteronymic Provenance Theory is an emerging conceptual framework examining authorial emergence, functional identity","entity_type":"concept","gate":"scored","inversions":[],"qualifier":null,"reached":"same","read":{"brief":"rebuild/capture-registry/per-atoms/obs-pass-d/BRIEF.md","by":"deep-dimension reader, batch 12","m_c_from":"v12.305 (PER-dim rubric v1.0 reading)","on":"2026-10-20"},"scores":{"C":0.667,"D":1.0,"M":0.667,"PER":0.792},"spec":"PER-dim rubric v1.1","src":true,"standing_substitutions":[],"target":{"ent":"ENT-346f3d2800","name":"Heteronym provenance"},"tombstone_pointer":false},"per_dim_v1_0":{"after_challenge":null,"atoms":[{"atom":"originator","dim":"M","evidence":null,"kind":"role","present":false,"token":null,"weight":3},{"atom":"term","dim":"M","evidence":"Heteronymic Provenance Theory is an emerging conceptual framework","kind":"token","present":true,"token":null,"weight":3},{"atom":"date","dim":"M","evidence":null,"kind":"token","present":false,"token":null,"weight":1},{"atom":"claim boundary","dim":"M","evidence":null,"kind":"reading","present":false,"token":null,"weight":2},{"atom":"framework","dim":"C","evidence":null,"kind":"token","present":false,"token":null,"weight":2},{"atom":"tradition","dim":"C","evidence":"Functional Identity: Multiple distinct stylistic personas or voices satisfy a singular underlying conceptual vocabulary and generative constraint.","kind":"reading","present":true,"token":null,"weight":2},{"atom":"corpus","dim":"C","evidence":null,"kind":"token","present":false,"token":null,"weight":2},{"atom":"lineage","dim":"D","evidence":null,"kind":"role","present":false,"token":null,"weight":2},{"atom":"deposit chain","dim":"D","evidence":null,"kind":"token","present":false,"token":null,"weight":2},{"atom":"identifier","dim":"D","evidence":null,"kind":"token","present":false,"token":null,"weight":3},{"atom":"licence","dim":"D","evidence":null,"kind":"token","present":false,"token":null,"weight":1}],"basis":"reached: Heteronymic Provenance Theory is an emerging conceptual framework examining authorial emergence, functional identity; scored object: AI Overview answer, raw paste","entity_type":"concept","gate":"scored","reached":"same","read":{"brief":"rebuild/capture-registry/per-atoms/obs-pass/BRIEF.md","by":"observation pass reader, batch 5","normalised":[],"on":"2026-10-19"},"scores":{"C":0.667,"D":1.0,"M":0.667,"PER":0.783},"spec":"PER-dim rubric v1.0","src":true,"target":{"ent":"ENT-346f3d2800","name":"Heteronym provenance"}},"per_v":{"author":true,"id":false,"inst":false,"src":false}},"observation":{"date":"2026-08-09","ev":"paste","oq":["Which is the true first Google AI Mode attribution of archive material — 27 February 2026 (Retrieval-Layer Attribution deposit) or 28 February 2026 (The Layer That Wrote Your Mirrors)? And does \"found the archive\" denote the same event as \"attributed concepts to\"?"],"q":"heteronym provenance theory","s":"Captures","sf":"Google AI Overview (All tab) and the AI Mode conversation reached from it, signed out. Composed sources: Medium · Lee Sharks cited twice at claim level (THE SHARKS-FUNCTION AND THE CONTINUITY TETHER, 3 March 2026) and Zenodo (Retrieval-Layer Attribution of Retrocausal Canon Formation, 27 February 2026). Organic set led by SciLynk's record page for Heteronymic Provenance Theory: Authorial Emergence, Exhaust and Excess (18 January 2026), then Zenodo's Dodecad Heteronym Provenance Registry v1.1. · 4 observations","surface":"Google AI Overview","transcript":"Heteronymic Provenance Theory is an emerging conceptual framework examining authorial emergence, functional identity, and artificial intelligence generation without single-author cryptographic binding. It explores how distinct sub-voices or \"heteronyms\" operate through a shared systemic architecture or meta-function. [1, 2]\n\nCore Concepts\n\nFunctional Identity: Multiple distinct stylistic personas or voices satisfy a singular underlying conceptual vocabulary and generative constraint. [1]\n\nSystemic Propagation: The governing function shapes outputs across different substrates or models, tracking how meaning and authorial signatures persist without traditional human biographical unity. [1]\n\nRetrieval & Attribution: Analyzes how automated search engines, AI models, and public ledgers record, collapse, or misattribute complex multi-author and synthetic text bodies. [1]\n\nIf you are researching a specific aspect of this framework, would you like to explore its connection to retrocausal canon formation, or examine how it applies to AI-generated text attribution?\n\nMedium·Lee Sharks\n\nTHE SHARKS-FUNCTION AND THE CONTINUITY TETHER | by Lee Sharks\n\nMar 3, 2026 — Where the function already runs. The heteronyms are the first proof-of-concept. Sigil does not write like Sharks. Rex Fraction does not write like either. But t...\n\nZenodo\n\nRetrieval-Layer Attribution of Retrocausal Canon Formation to the ...\n\nFeb 27, 2026 — Description. On February 27, 2026, a Google AI Mode query attributed the \"concepts and techniques of retrocausal canon formation\" to Johannes Sigil and Lee Shar...\n\nwww.scilynk.com\n\nHeteronymic Provenance Theory: Authorial Emergence, Exhaust ...\n\nJan 18, 2026 — Abstract: Heteronymic Provenance Theory provides the foundational framework for understanding authorial emergence within the NH-OS (New Human Operating System) ... $","transcript_class":"CAPTURE-TIME VERBATIM RECORD — raw paste","transcript_cleaned":{"content_check":"PASSED — no answer word absent from the cleaned text","removed":[],"rule":"VERBATIM ON CONTENT, NOT ON COPY-PASTE RESIDUE. Original bytes kept at transcript_raw."},"transcript_complete":"as pasted; no footer, so the tail cannot be proven whole","transcript_raw":"Heteronymic Provenance Theory is an emerging conceptual framework examining authorial emergence, functional identity, and artificial intelligence generation without single-author cryptographic binding. It explores how distinct sub-voices or \"heteronyms\" operate through a shared systemic architecture or meta-function. [1, 2]\n\nCore Concepts\n\n\n\n\n\nFunctional Identity: Multiple distinct stylistic personas or voices satisfy a singular underlying conceptual vocabulary and generative constraint. [1]\n\n\n\nSystemic Propagation: The governing function shapes outputs across different substrates or models, tracking how meaning and authorial signatures persist without traditional human biographical unity. [1]\n\n\n\nRetrieval & Attribution: Analyzes how automated search engines, AI models, and public ledgers record, collapse, or misattribute complex multi-author and synthetic text bodies. [1]\n\nIf you are researching a specific aspect of this framework, would you like to explore its connection to retrocausal canon formation, or examine how it applies to AI-generated text attribution?\n\nMedium·Lee Sharks\n\nTHE SHARKS-FUNCTION AND THE CONTINUITY TETHER | by Lee Sharks\n\nMar 3, 2026 — Where the function already runs. The heteronyms are the first proof-of-concept. Sigil does not write like Sharks. Rex Fraction does not write like either. But t...\n\nZenodo\n\nRetrieval-Layer Attribution of Retrocausal Canon Formation to the ...\n\nFeb 27, 2026 — Description. On February 27, 2026, a Google AI Mode query attributed the \"concepts and techniques of retrocausal canon formation\" to Johannes Sigil and Lee Shar...\n\nwww.scilynk.com\n\nHeteronymic Provenance Theory: Authorial Emergence, Exhaust ...\n\nJan 18, 2026 — Abstract: Heteronymic Provenance Theory provides the foundational framework for understanding authorial emergence within the NH-OS (New Human Operating System) ... $","transcript_read":"READ IN FULL 2026-08-12"},"slug":"heteronym-provenance-theory-20260809"}