{
 "slug": "provenance-erasure-rate-20260911",
 "date": "2026-09-11",
 "surface": "Google AI Overview",
 "surface_basis": null,
 "surfaces": [
  "Google AI Overview"
 ],
 "auth": "signed out, incognito",
 "auth_basis": null,
 "ev": "paste",
 "mt": "CAPTURE",
 "s": "Architecture",
 "q": "provenance erasure rate",
 "q_kind": null,
 "cites": 3,
 "cite_list": null,
 "archive_controlled_cites": null,
 "transcript": "**USER:** provenance erasure rate\n\n**GOOGLE AI MODE:**\nThe Provenance Erasure Rate (PER) is a metric defined as PER = 1 - (retained\nprovenance units / required provenance units), measuring the systematic removal or\nloss of authorial lineage through AI synthesis, compression, or institutional action. [1]\n\nOverview of Provenance Erasure\n●​ Definition: The systematic loss or removal of authorial and historical lineage in\ndata, text, or digital artifacts.\n●​ The Formula: \\(\\text{PER} = 1 - [\\text{retained provenance units} / \\text{required\nprovenance units}]\\).\n●​ Taxonomy: Broken down into a three-tier model (PER-M, PER-C, PER-D)\ncovering different depths of lineage loss.\n●​ Core Domains: Applies to AI composition, historical and cultural erasure, and\nAI-mediated production. [1]\n\n\fAs discussed in broader contexts regarding Standards For Data Provenance And Digital\nPreservation, maintaining clear origin tracking is increasingly vital as automated\nsystems process and alter underlying source data. [1]\nIf you would like, I can dive deeper into:\n●​ The three-tier taxonomy (PER-M, PER-C, PER-D)\n●​ Specific applications in AI composition versus cultural history\n\nLet me know how you want to proceed.\n\nForbes\n\nStandards For Data Provenance And Digital Preservation - Forbes\nJul 19, 2025 — Long term digital preservation of data and other digital content faces several challenges. The first is\ndegradation of the recorded information due to physical ...\n\nzenodo.org\n\nCanonical Definition Surface for Provenance Erasure, PER Metric, and ...\nMay 15, 2026 — Description. Source code for provenanceerasure.org, the canonical public-facing definition surface for\nprovenance erasure, the Provenance Erasure Rate (PER) met...\n\n$\n\nSemantic liquidation is a contemporary theoretical concept within political economy\nand artificial intelligence, primarily popularized by researcher Lee Sharks. It describes\nthe process by which human meaning, language, and authorship are broken\ndown into standardized data units to be converted into financial or computational\nvalue\n. [1, 2, 3]\n\n\fRather than a simple metaphor, the term treats \"meaning\" as a resource that platform\ncapitalism and AI systems harvest, dissolve, and monetize. [1, 2]\n\n🌐 The Framework: The Semantic Economy\nThe term operates within a broader framework known as the Semantic Economy.\nUnder this theory, the lifecycle of human communication is treated like any physical\nsupply chain: [1]\n●​ Production & Circulation: Humans create language, art, and knowledge, which\ncirculate across digital networks. [1]\n●​ Extraction: Large Language Models (LLMs) and tech platforms scrape this data.\n[1, 2]\n●​ Semantic Liquidation: The crucial phase where situated, human-authored text\nis stripped of its original context, author intent, and nuance. It is dissolved into\nraw vector embeddings, tokens, and mathematical weights. [1]\n●​ Monetization: These refined units are then weaponized to generate automated\ncontent, enterprise intelligence, or platform revenue, effectively \"liquidating\" an\nintangible human asset into computational equity. [1]\n\n⚖️ Alternate Contexts\nDepending on the domain, \"semantic liquidation\" or similar phrasings can refer to\ncompletely different events:\n●​ Corporate Insolvency: In financial history, Semantic Software Asia Pacific\nLimited was an actual tech firm that was forced into a court-ordered liquidation\nby the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).\n●​ DeFi / Crypto: In decentralized finance, liquidations can occur across token\nnetworks or protocols acting on a \"semantic layer\" (the structural layer governing\nsmart contracts).\n●​ Political Rhetoric: Historically, the phrase \"semantic liquidation of the\nopposition\" has been used to describe propaganda techniques where totalitarian\nregimes change word definitions to politically erase or demonize dissidents. [1, 2,\n3, 4, 5]\n\n\fIf you are exploring this for research, let me know if you would like me to:\n●​ Expand on Lee Sharks' essays regarding AI and capital.\n●​ Contrast this with enterprise executable semantics or other engineering\nframeworks.\n●​ Dig into the history of the ASIC corporate liquidation case. [1, 2, 3]\n\nMedium·Lee Sharks\n\nSemantic Liquidation: An Executive Summary | by Lee Sharks - Medium\nJan 6, 2026 — Semantic liquidation is not a metaphor. It is an operation performed billions of times daily by systems\ndesigned to convert meaning into value.\n\nZenodo\n\nSemantic Economy: A Retrieval-Layer Disambiguation (Octang)\nApr 26, 2026 — Octang (Orange Collapse Total Axial Negation Graph) disambiguating three distinct uses of the term\n'semantic economy' currently blended by AI Overview systems. ...\n\nASIC\n\nASIC applies to appoint provisional liquidators to Semantic Software ...\nJun 25, 2021 — - orders restraining Semantic, a director and a former director of Semantic, from receiving or soliciting\nfunds from investors and from advertising, promoting o...\n\nMedium·Lee Sharks\n\nThe Liquidation of Water: AI, Capital, and the Evaporation of Meaning - Medium\nJan 2, 2026 — Semantic liquidation is the process by which this extraction occurs. Situated meaning is dissolved into\nretrievable units. Authorship is ...\n\n\fAcademia.edu\n\n(PDF) SEMANTIC ECONOMY SINGULARITY - Academia.edu\nThe Semantic Economy is the system by which meaning is produced, circulated, extracted, and liquidated under platform\ncapitalism. It is not a metaphor.\n\nASIC\n\nSemantic Software Asia Pacific Limited (In Liquidation) 134 067 691\nJun 29, 2023 — Semantic Software Asia Pacific Limited (In Liquidation) 134 067 691 | Court Liquidation | Meeting | Select\nOne | Published : 29/06/2023 | ASIC Notice Details.\n\nASIC\n\n21-183MR ASIC obtains orders to wind up Semantic Software Asia Pacific Limited\nJul 21, 2021 — On 15 July 2021, the New South Wales Supreme Court ordered that Semantic Software Asia Pacific Limited\n(Semantic) be wound up on just and ...\n\nCoinGlass\n\n42 Liquidations: Semantic Layer Futures Long & Short Data & Charts | CoinGlass\n42 Liquidation occurs when a trader's margin account can no longer support their open positions due to significant price\nvolatility.\n\n\fWydawnictwo Podziemne\n\nSemantic Liquidation of the Opposition - - Wydawnictwo Podziemne\nDec 3, 2009 — In reality, the anti-Communists were semantically eliminated from the game. The thoughtless multitude is\nso attached to words that eliminating ...",
 "transcript_raw": null,
 "transcript_class": "CAPTURE-TIME VERBATIM RECORD",
 "transcript_complete": "complete as supplied",
 "transcript_read": "READ IN FULL 2026-09-11",
 "per": null,
 "per_v": null,
 "per_note": null,
 "sf": null,
 "sf_derived": null,
 "reading": null,
 "analysis": null,
 "d": "[CONTROL — RESOLVED] RESOLVED UNQUOTED, WITH ATTRIBUTION. THE DECISIVE CONTROL: this concept escaped on FOUR deposits within 90 days of first appearance — the same support level as naming-gap reflex and provenance debt, both of which dissolved on 2026-09-11. Support at 90 days: 4 deposits. Sources: academia.edu, provenanceerasure.org, zenodo.org. CONTROL ARM of the concept-entrance test. Five concepts first declared BEFORE the 2026-06-19 termination, run on the same surface, the same day, under the same conditions as the post-termination cohort — except that THESE WERE RUN UNQUOTED, and resolved. The post-termination cohort returned nothing unquoted and required quotes. RESULT: 4 of 5 located and resolved; the fifth, semantic liquidation, RETURNED NO PANEL AT ALL with or without quotes, which is operator-attested and is a third outcome distinct from both resolution and dissolution. The matched comparison holds support constant: provenance erasure rate escaped on FOUR deposits at 90 days and erasure skew on ONE, against naming-gap reflex 4, provenance debt 4, interlocking autoregression 2, all of which dissolved. Internal support does not separate the cohorts. The substrate does.",
 "d_full": "[CONTROL — RESOLVED] RESOLVED UNQUOTED, WITH ATTRIBUTION. THE DECISIVE CONTROL: this concept escaped on FOUR deposits within 90 days of first appearance — the same support level as naming-gap reflex and provenance debt, both of which dissolved on 2026-09-11. Support at 90 days: 4 deposits. Sources: academia.edu, provenanceerasure.org, zenodo.org. CONTROL ARM of the concept-entrance test. Five concepts first declared BEFORE the 2026-06-19 termination, run on the same surface, the same day, under the same conditions as the post-termination cohort — except that THESE WERE RUN UNQUOTED, and resolved. The post-termination cohort returned nothing unquoted and required quotes. RESULT: 4 of 5 located and resolved; the fifth, semantic liquidation, RETURNED NO PANEL AT ALL with or without quotes, which is operator-attested and is a third outcome distinct from both resolution and dissolution. The matched comparison holds support constant: provenance erasure rate escaped on FOUR deposits at 90 days and erasure skew on ONE, against naming-gap reflex 4, provenance debt 4, interlocking autoregression 2, all of which dissolved. Internal support does not separate the cohorts. The substrate does.",
 "d_truncated": false,
 "links": [
  {
   "url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/captures/provenance-erasure-rate-20260911/",
   "authority": "canonical",
   "note": "the capture's own record page; cite this form"
  },
  {
   "url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/captures/#provenance-erasure-rate-20260911",
   "authority": "gallery",
   "note": "the canonical gallery, anchored by slug"
  },
  {
   "url": "https://www.godkinggoogle.com/captures/#provenance-erasure-rate-20260911",
   "authority": "mirror",
   "note": "a window that renders from the archive's registry; may lag a deploy"
  },
  {
   "url": "https://www.leesharks.com/captures/#provenance-erasure-rate-20260911",
   "authority": "mirror",
   "note": "a window that renders from the archive's registry; may lag a deploy"
  },
  {
   "url": "https://www.machinemediation.org/captures/#provenance-erasure-rate-20260911",
   "authority": "mirror",
   "note": "a window that renders from the archive's registry; may lag a deploy"
  }
 ],
 "imgs": [],
 "img_urls": [],
 "cite": "https://www.alexanarch.org/captures/provenance-erasure-rate-20260911/",
 "citable_unit": "address — the exact issued string on one surface, per the Surface Rule (MANUS, 2026-08-15)",
 "addr_id": "ADDR-72cedb6e627d",
 "obs_id": "OBS-697d21b18f3d",
 "n_observations": 1,
 "observations": [],
 "dates": [
  "2026-09-11"
 ],
 "defects": [],
 "findings": [],
 "series": "concept-entrance-controls-20260911",
 "other_slugs": null,
 "collisions": null,
 "oq": null,
 "rounds": null,
 "turns": null,
 "rerun": null,
 "rerun_alt": null,
 "heteronym": null,
 "model_attribution": null,
 "operator_disclosure": null,
 "longitudinal_priors": null,
 "longitudinal_successors": null,
 "related_deposits": null,
 "notes": null,
 "record_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/captures/provenance-erasure-rate-20260911/"
}