{
 "spxi_instrument": {
  "method": "0.9",
  "name": "Capture Registry (longitudinal observation)",
  "level": 0,
  "level_name": "Measurement",
  "url": "https://www.spxi.dev/methods/#m-0-9",
  "inventory": "https://www.spxi.dev/methods/",
  "statement": "SPXI instrument: method 0.9 of 87, level 0 (Measurement), Capture Registry (longitudinal observation).",
  "also": []
 },
 "slug": "fairwork-cloudwork-ratings-aio-20261029",
 "date": "2026-10-29",
 "surface": "Google AI Overview",
 "surface_basis": "Operator default of 2026-10-01 (runs begin in the Overview unless he says AI Mode); the 'AI Mode Conversation' paste is the Overview expanded (operator, 2026-10-18).",
 "surfaces": [
  "Google AI Overview"
 ],
 "auth": "signed out, incognito",
 "auth_basis": "Operator default of 2026-10-14.",
 "ev": "paste",
 "mt": "THE FAIRWORK CLOUDWORK RATINGS ON THE OVERVIEW — THE FIVE PRINCIPLES, THE 10-POINT SCALE, 16 PLATFORMS IN 2025, RIGHT; THE SCORES THEMSELVES (THREE AT 8, MECHANICAL TURK AT 0) AND THE MISSING-POINT CAVEAT ABSENT",
 "match": "BROAD MATCH",
 "match_note": null,
 "s": "Machine Reception",
 "q": "Fairwork Cloudwork Ratings",
 "q_kind": "the common name of an entity of the Labor Vector meta-aggregator (Fairwork Cloudwork Ratings; record https://www.laborvector.org/aggregators/fairwork-cloudwork/, compiled 2026-10-29), supplied for capture and run by the operator the same day, to supply the composition layer's account of the entity for its record and its /non row. A baseline: the record landed on laborvector.org the same day (commit bf90841) and no card cites it. NEW address.",
 "cites": 8,
 "cite_list": [
  {
   "n": 1,
   "site": "University of Oxford",
   "rel": "third_party",
   "url": null,
   "title": "Fairwork Cloudwork Ratings 2025",
   "snip": "The Fairwork project evaluates basic standards of fairness in working arrangements on digital labour platforms according to five principles of fair work, concer...",
   "note": null
  },
  {
   "n": 2,
   "site": "Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung | WZB",
   "rel": "third_party",
   "url": null,
   "title": "New Fairwork Cloudwork Rating | WZB",
   "snip": "Aug 24, 2022 — New Fairwork Cloudwork Rating. The Fairwork Project has published a new report evaluating employment relationships on international cloudwork platforms. The bas...",
   "note": null
  },
  {
   "n": 3,
   "site": "King's College London",
   "rel": "third_party",
   "url": null,
   "title": "Fairwork Cloudwork Ratings 2022: Work in the Plenatary Labour Market - King's College London",
   "snip": "Document: Fairwork Cloudwork Ratings 2022: Work in the Planetary Labour Market published by Fairwork in 2022 (34 pages). Assessment: Evaluates 15 online remote ...",
   "note": null
  },
  {
   "n": 4,
   "site": "University of Oxford",
   "rel": "third_party",
   "url": null,
   "title": "Cloudwork - Fairwork - University of Oxford",
   "snip": "The Fairwork Cloudwork Ratings 2023 assesses and scores basic standards of fairness in working arrangements on 15 web-based digital labour platforms according t...",
   "note": null
  },
  {
   "n": 5,
   "site": "YouTube·Fairwork",
   "rel": "third_party",
   "url": null,
   "title": "Report Launch: Fairwork Cloudwork Ratings 2023",
   "snip": null,
   "note": "video, 01:31:20"
  },
  {
   "n": 6,
   "site": "The Global Recruiter",
   "rel": "third_party",
   "url": null,
   "title": "Cloudwork fails to meet standards",
   "snip": "Cloudwork fails to meet standards Over half of platforms include contract clauses that actively weaken workers' rights such as vague job descriptions, blanket l...",
   "note": null
  },
  {
   "n": 7,
   "site": "YouTube·Fairwork",
   "rel": "third_party",
   "url": null,
   "title": "How fair are freelance and remote work platforms?",
   "snip": null,
   "note": "video, 2:20"
  },
  {
   "n": 8,
   "site": "fair.work",
   "rel": "third_party",
   "url": null,
   "title": "Fairwork Certification | Independent certification for the labour behind AI",
   "snip": "Fairwork independently certifies the firms that commission this work, based on evidence including the voices of the workers themselves. For those firms, it's in...",
   "note": null
  }
 ],
 "archive_controlled_cites": 0,
 "transcript": "[Google AI Overview at the query, signed out and incognito (operator defaults of 2026-10-01 and 2026-10-14), 2026-10-29. The paste is the Overview expanded (the 'AI Mode Conversation' view, with the source cards that follow the answer); the 'You said' line carries the query twice, run together, and is given once here. Inline links are Google redirect URLs, kept as pasted.]\n\n[QUERENT] Fairwork Cloudwork Ratings\n\n[SYSTEM] The Fairwork Cloudwork Ratings are published by the [Fairwork Project](https://www.google.com/goto?url=CAESSgHrOzAVpdXapu80-WblepoBY_Xm0bCZYdRIv0Mu3FJIWlstqpIukANd87TvFVsrhGqQmc1oRPhYeWw-s6ysNznjGIPltjbyRWFB) (spun out of the Oxford Internet Institute and the Berlin Social Science Center WZB). They evaluate online remote digital labor platforms (cloudwork) across five core principles of fairness: [[1](https://www.google.com/goto?url=CAESqwEB6zswFSE2USaGHfykY5UHUz5nSPktY1mMfFiyzIqy5ovf_4cMsQ1W7tyk56Q9vR_jMyRvHNQ9mrE8uYtyDzlU-8RfRsO9aqVv4lF8TEaAoTaSulil2jPRL-hFARicqEIx5nVH-noqpEqDbBvl1r7caNcyi6LRgd5HUGg3cUTPDMS1XgOYjA8k1p8-ogVkY9klm0NGFg78L8NLk7YfT0TQ6gs0u36_RXS1txY), [2](https://www.google.com/goto?url=CAESSgHrOzAVpdXapu80-WblepoBY_Xm0bCZYdRIv0Mu3FJIWlstqpIukANd87TvFVsrhGqQmc1oRPhYeWw-s6ysNznjGIPltjbyRWFB), [3](https://www.google.com/goto?url=CAESogEB6zswFdzMt4lTM8OMTfHq-TTH3W62_SujXv-W34BAZ8NimUdxWldIf5BzGWGWBsHdRYKpdVG3rdMHIhYKJ9MDBOKT2cJ4HBHCXU4M76TIwY25EPI4Cx84CQDUtW9LVzq8cKCd9zZO6AY5F5Efqknmy5YbUoi8niUMR4tyrjQWHT-jQgn4w6JQ2wlKvsOPtYnv3Uj3LmjX5u7m3eD7MLs_AJw)]\n\n* Fair Pay: Ensuring workers earn a wage proportional to local or national minimum standards after costs.\n* Fair Conditions: Protecting workers from digital hazards, health risks (e.g., burnout, back pain), and unsafe environments.\n* Fair Contracts: Providing clear, transparent terms without blanket liability clauses or vague job descriptions.\n* Fair Management: Offering due process, grievance channels, freedom from arbitrary deactivation, and anti-discrimination measures.\n* Fair Representation: Recognizing and engaging with workers' collective voice, freedom of association, and potential for collective bargaining. [[1](https://www.google.com/goto?url=CAESYwHrOzAVWyseHcrOgeLYqeuVaciIbT2Bl2gheegz8O49fNCFxbxYdR5T7ur7dv2HNN_kFwj7pw73hWUnh9o4u5T3fXX1phCrChePJl7YO6f9pl7sQaeX5KLnBxSyuitR0c4RqA), [2](https://www.google.com/goto?url=CAESfQHrOzAVmT_5Cq28BhzXXpWWhw_NsRR2M1YeqnnaJ63ypIhP5p_TYGYEzHEc_LXvWbJOtW7j2k__TFM9OfJ6YMz6bqUASor1yExM9Et87zeyspdWRDF4kg81g9jcCZiBAiGY7VN8KsRgoT0tby5-10-bUUFS0CsiqZESvYBT), [3](https://www.google.com/goto?url=CAESogEB6zswFdzMt4lTM8OMTfHq-TTH3W62_SujXv-W34BAZ8NimUdxWldIf5BzGWGWBsHdRYKpdVG3rdMHIhYKJ9MDBOKT2cJ4HBHCXU4M76TIwY25EPI4Cx84CQDUtW9LVzq8cKCd9zZO6AY5F5Efqknmy5YbUoi8niUMR4tyrjQWHT-jQgn4w6JQ2wlKvsOPtYnv3Uj3LmjX5u7m3eD7MLs_AJw)]\n\nKey Findings from Recent Reports\n\n* Scoring Scale: Platforms are scored out of 10 points based on concrete evidence provided for each threshold. [[1](https://www.google.com/goto?url=CAESYwHrOzAVrtHczA8RUvhA5UzIvhfYJVNZcQzQH4v1nc9xIpI4hwqMR2y530awmU5yXnsPbAenu5LsgMVJRoiR5LectlKp69zDDWMTAUCN1Q6K55iZUihRcO2VOJf65ngLwPLSmQ), [2](https://www.google.com/goto?url=CAESogEB6zswFdzMt4lTM8OMTfHq-TTH3W62_SujXv-W34BAZ8NimUdxWldIf5BzGWGWBsHdRYKpdVG3rdMHIhYKJ9MDBOKT2cJ4HBHCXU4M76TIwY25EPI4Cx84CQDUtW9LVzq8cKCd9zZO6AY5F5Efqknmy5YbUoi8niUMR4tyrjQWHT-jQgn4w6JQ2wlKvsOPtYnv3Uj3LmjX5u7m3eD7MLs_AJw)]\n* General Trend: Most remote and freelance cloudwork platforms struggle to meet basic fairness standards, though recent reports (such as the 2025 assessment covering 16 platforms) show incremental improvements in areas like formal recognition of the right to organize. [[1](https://www.google.com/goto?url=CAESfQHrOzAVmT_5Cq28BhzXXpWWhw_NsRR2M1YeqnnaJ63ypIhP5p_TYGYEzHEc_LXvWbJOtW7j2k__TFM9OfJ6YMz6bqUASor1yExM9Et87zeyspdWRDF4kg81g9jcCZiBAiGY7VN8KsRgoT0tby5-10-bUUFS0CsiqZESvYBT), [2](https://www.google.com/goto?url=CAESogEB6zswFdzMt4lTM8OMTfHq-TTH3W62_SujXv-W34BAZ8NimUdxWldIf5BzGWGWBsHdRYKpdVG3rdMHIhYKJ9MDBOKT2cJ4HBHCXU4M76TIwY25EPI4Cx84CQDUtW9LVzq8cKCd9zZO6AY5F5Efqknmy5YbUoi8niUMR4tyrjQWHT-jQgn4w6JQ2wlKvsOPtYnv3Uj3LmjX5u7m3eD7MLs_AJw)]\n* Global Disparities: Workers in the Global South often face steeper challenges, lower effective compensation relative to local costs of living, and higher rates of unaddressed discrimination. [[1](https://www.google.com/goto?url=CAESYwHrOzAVWyseHcrOgeLYqeuVaciIbT2Bl2gheegz8O49fNCFxbxYdR5T7ur7dv2HNN_kFwj7pw73hWUnh9o4u5T3fXX1phCrChePJl7YO6f9pl7sQaeX5KLnBxSyuitR0c4RqA)]\n\nYou can read the full breakdown and platform scorecards on the [Fairwork Cloudwork Ratings Page](https://www.google.com/goto?url=CAESawHrOzAVXbgLBpcTcS59Pb0TSfgk1Hcmn7jysid1ayaa9YNIbSSuQ5yXGJ_ThmxPeimEAs5k6BHBIK1azu6t0gvH7o0YKkEUc7gX0CGS1tJNCCG0PGqOOmU0XS6OqpIyXyv1huk-PRq0xkDP). [[1](https://www.google.com/goto?url=CAESawHrOzAVXbgLBpcTcS59Pb0TSfgk1Hcmn7jysid1ayaa9YNIbSSuQ5yXGJ_ThmxPeimEAs5k6BHBIK1azu6t0gvH7o0YKkEUc7gX0CGS1tJNCCG0PGqOOmU0XS6OqpIyXyv1huk-PRq0xkDP)]\nWould you like to know more about a specific platform's score (such as Upwork, Fiverr, or Amazon Mechanical Turk), or the details of a particular Fairwork principle?\nUniversity of Oxford\nFairwork Cloudwork Ratings 2025\nThe Fairwork project evaluates basic standards of fairness in working arrangements on digital labour platforms according to five principles of fair work, concer...\nWissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung | WZB\nNew Fairwork Cloudwork Rating | WZB\nAug 24, 2022 — New Fairwork Cloudwork Rating. The Fairwork Project has published a new report evaluating employment relationships on international cloudwork platforms. The bas...\nKing's College London\nFairwork Cloudwork Ratings 2022: Work in the Plenatary Labour Market - King's College London\nDocument: Fairwork Cloudwork Ratings 2022: Work in the Planetary Labour Market published by Fairwork in 2022 (34 pages). Assessment: Evaluates 15 online remote ...\nUniversity of Oxford\nCloudwork - Fairwork - University of Oxford\nThe Fairwork Cloudwork Ratings 2023 assesses and scores basic standards of fairness in working arrangements on 15 web-based digital labour platforms according t...\nYouTube·Fairwork\n01:31:20\nReport Launch: Fairwork Cloudwork Ratings 2023\nThe Global Recruiter\nCloudwork fails to meet standards\nCloudwork fails to meet standards Over half of platforms include contract clauses that actively weaken workers' rights such as vague job descriptions, blanket l...\nYouTube·Fairwork\n2:20\nHow fair are freelance and remote work platforms?\nfair.work\nFairwork Certification | Independent certification for the labour behind AI\nFairwork independently certifies the firms that commission this work, based on evidence including the voices of the workers themselves. For those firms, it's in...\nAI responses may include mistakes. [Learn more](https://support.google.com/websearch?p=ai_overviews)",
 "transcript_raw": "The Fairwork Cloudwork Ratings are published by the [Fairwork Project](https://www.google.com/goto?url=CAESSgHrOzAVpdXapu80-WblepoBY_Xm0bCZYdRIv0Mu3FJIWlstqpIukANd87TvFVsrhGqQmc1oRPhYeWw-s6ysNznjGIPltjbyRWFB) (spun out of the Oxford Internet Institute and the Berlin Social Science Center WZB). They evaluate online remote digital labor platforms (cloudwork) across five core principles of fairness: [[1](https://www.google.com/goto?url=CAESqwEB6zswFSE2USaGHfykY5UHUz5nSPktY1mMfFiyzIqy5ovf_4cMsQ1W7tyk56Q9vR_jMyRvHNQ9mrE8uYtyDzlU-8RfRsO9aqVv4lF8TEaAoTaSulil2jPRL-hFARicqEIx5nVH-noqpEqDbBvl1r7caNcyi6LRgd5HUGg3cUTPDMS1XgOYjA8k1p8-ogVkY9klm0NGFg78L8NLk7YfT0TQ6gs0u36_RXS1txY), [2](https://www.google.com/goto?url=CAESSgHrOzAVpdXapu80-WblepoBY_Xm0bCZYdRIv0Mu3FJIWlstqpIukANd87TvFVsrhGqQmc1oRPhYeWw-s6ysNznjGIPltjbyRWFB), [3](https://www.google.com/goto?url=CAESogEB6zswFdzMt4lTM8OMTfHq-TTH3W62_SujXv-W34BAZ8NimUdxWldIf5BzGWGWBsHdRYKpdVG3rdMHIhYKJ9MDBOKT2cJ4HBHCXU4M76TIwY25EPI4Cx84CQDUtW9LVzq8cKCd9zZO6AY5F5Efqknmy5YbUoi8niUMR4tyrjQWHT-jQgn4w6JQ2wlKvsOPtYnv3Uj3LmjX5u7m3eD7MLs_AJw)]\n\n* Fair Pay: Ensuring workers earn a wage proportional to local or national minimum standards after costs.\n* Fair Conditions: Protecting workers from digital hazards, health risks (e.g., burnout, back pain), and unsafe environments.\n* Fair Contracts: Providing clear, transparent terms without blanket liability clauses or vague job descriptions.\n* Fair Management: Offering due process, grievance channels, freedom from arbitrary deactivation, and anti-discrimination measures.\n* Fair Representation: Recognizing and engaging with workers' collective voice, freedom of association, and potential for collective bargaining. [[1](https://www.google.com/goto?url=CAESYwHrOzAVWyseHcrOgeLYqeuVaciIbT2Bl2gheegz8O49fNCFxbxYdR5T7ur7dv2HNN_kFwj7pw73hWUnh9o4u5T3fXX1phCrChePJl7YO6f9pl7sQaeX5KLnBxSyuitR0c4RqA), [2](https://www.google.com/goto?url=CAESfQHrOzAVmT_5Cq28BhzXXpWWhw_NsRR2M1YeqnnaJ63ypIhP5p_TYGYEzHEc_LXvWbJOtW7j2k__TFM9OfJ6YMz6bqUASor1yExM9Et87zeyspdWRDF4kg81g9jcCZiBAiGY7VN8KsRgoT0tby5-10-bUUFS0CsiqZESvYBT), [3](https://www.google.com/goto?url=CAESogEB6zswFdzMt4lTM8OMTfHq-TTH3W62_SujXv-W34BAZ8NimUdxWldIf5BzGWGWBsHdRYKpdVG3rdMHIhYKJ9MDBOKT2cJ4HBHCXU4M76TIwY25EPI4Cx84CQDUtW9LVzq8cKCd9zZO6AY5F5Efqknmy5YbUoi8niUMR4tyrjQWHT-jQgn4w6JQ2wlKvsOPtYnv3Uj3LmjX5u7m3eD7MLs_AJw)]\n\nKey Findings from Recent Reports\n\n* Scoring Scale: Platforms are scored out of 10 points based on concrete evidence provided for each threshold. [[1](https://www.google.com/goto?url=CAESYwHrOzAVrtHczA8RUvhA5UzIvhfYJVNZcQzQH4v1nc9xIpI4hwqMR2y530awmU5yXnsPbAenu5LsgMVJRoiR5LectlKp69zDDWMTAUCN1Q6K55iZUihRcO2VOJf65ngLwPLSmQ), [2](https://www.google.com/goto?url=CAESogEB6zswFdzMt4lTM8OMTfHq-TTH3W62_SujXv-W34BAZ8NimUdxWldIf5BzGWGWBsHdRYKpdVG3rdMHIhYKJ9MDBOKT2cJ4HBHCXU4M76TIwY25EPI4Cx84CQDUtW9LVzq8cKCd9zZO6AY5F5Efqknmy5YbUoi8niUMR4tyrjQWHT-jQgn4w6JQ2wlKvsOPtYnv3Uj3LmjX5u7m3eD7MLs_AJw)]\n* General Trend: Most remote and freelance cloudwork platforms struggle to meet basic fairness standards, though recent reports (such as the 2025 assessment covering 16 platforms) show incremental improvements in areas like formal recognition of the right to organize. [[1](https://www.google.com/goto?url=CAESfQHrOzAVmT_5Cq28BhzXXpWWhw_NsRR2M1YeqnnaJ63ypIhP5p_TYGYEzHEc_LXvWbJOtW7j2k__TFM9OfJ6YMz6bqUASor1yExM9Et87zeyspdWRDF4kg81g9jcCZiBAiGY7VN8KsRgoT0tby5-10-bUUFS0CsiqZESvYBT), [2](https://www.google.com/goto?url=CAESogEB6zswFdzMt4lTM8OMTfHq-TTH3W62_SujXv-W34BAZ8NimUdxWldIf5BzGWGWBsHdRYKpdVG3rdMHIhYKJ9MDBOKT2cJ4HBHCXU4M76TIwY25EPI4Cx84CQDUtW9LVzq8cKCd9zZO6AY5F5Efqknmy5YbUoi8niUMR4tyrjQWHT-jQgn4w6JQ2wlKvsOPtYnv3Uj3LmjX5u7m3eD7MLs_AJw)]\n* Global Disparities: Workers in the Global South often face steeper challenges, lower effective compensation relative to local costs of living, and higher rates of unaddressed discrimination. [[1](https://www.google.com/goto?url=CAESYwHrOzAVWyseHcrOgeLYqeuVaciIbT2Bl2gheegz8O49fNCFxbxYdR5T7ur7dv2HNN_kFwj7pw73hWUnh9o4u5T3fXX1phCrChePJl7YO6f9pl7sQaeX5KLnBxSyuitR0c4RqA)]\n\nYou can read the full breakdown and platform scorecards on the [Fairwork Cloudwork Ratings Page](https://www.google.com/goto?url=CAESawHrOzAVXbgLBpcTcS59Pb0TSfgk1Hcmn7jysid1ayaa9YNIbSSuQ5yXGJ_ThmxPeimEAs5k6BHBIK1azu6t0gvH7o0YKkEUc7gX0CGS1tJNCCG0PGqOOmU0XS6OqpIyXyv1huk-PRq0xkDP). [[1](https://www.google.com/goto?url=CAESawHrOzAVXbgLBpcTcS59Pb0TSfgk1Hcmn7jysid1ayaa9YNIbSSuQ5yXGJ_ThmxPeimEAs5k6BHBIK1azu6t0gvH7o0YKkEUc7gX0CGS1tJNCCG0PGqOOmU0XS6OqpIyXyv1huk-PRq0xkDP)]\nWould you like to know more about a specific platform's score (such as Upwork, Fiverr, or Amazon Mechanical Turk), or the details of a particular Fairwork principle?\nUniversity of Oxford\nFairwork Cloudwork Ratings 2025\nThe Fairwork project evaluates basic standards of fairness in working arrangements on digital labour platforms according to five principles of fair work, concer...\nWissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung | WZB\nNew Fairwork Cloudwork Rating | WZB\nAug 24, 2022 — New Fairwork Cloudwork Rating. The Fairwork Project has published a new report evaluating employment relationships on international cloudwork platforms. The bas...\nKing's College London\nFairwork Cloudwork Ratings 2022: Work in the Plenatary Labour Market - King's College London\nDocument: Fairwork Cloudwork Ratings 2022: Work in the Planetary Labour Market published by Fairwork in 2022 (34 pages). Assessment: Evaluates 15 online remote ...\nUniversity of Oxford\nCloudwork - Fairwork - University of Oxford\nThe Fairwork Cloudwork Ratings 2023 assesses and scores basic standards of fairness in working arrangements on 15 web-based digital labour platforms according t...\nYouTube·Fairwork\n01:31:20\nReport Launch: Fairwork Cloudwork Ratings 2023\nThe Global Recruiter\nCloudwork fails to meet standards\nCloudwork fails to meet standards Over half of platforms include contract clauses that actively weaken workers' rights such as vague job descriptions, blanket l...\nYouTube·Fairwork\n2:20\nHow fair are freelance and remote work platforms?\nfair.work\nFairwork Certification | Independent certification for the labour behind AI\nFairwork independently certifies the firms that commission this work, based on evidence including the voices of the workers themselves. For those firms, it's in...\nAI responses may include mistakes. [Learn more](https://support.google.com/websearch?p=ai_overviews)",
 "transcript_class": "CAPTURE-TIME VERBATIM RECORD — paste of the Overview expanded, with its source cards",
 "transcript_complete": "complete as supplied",
 "transcript_read": "READ IN FULL 2026-10-29",
 "per": 0.5,
 "per_corrected": null,
 "per_v": {
  "author": false,
  "inst": true,
  "id": false,
  "src": true
 },
 "per_note": "The Fairwork project, the OII and the WZB named; no person; no identifier; Fairwork's own report pages cited.",
 "availability": null,
 "per_dim": {
  "spec": "PER-dim rubric v1.1",
  "entity_type": "dataset",
  "target": {
   "ent": "TGT-lv-fairwork-cloudwork",
   "name": "Fairwork Cloudwork Ratings"
  },
  "qualifier": null,
  "reached": "same",
  "gate": "scored",
  "atoms": [
   {
    "atom": "name",
    "dim": "M",
    "weight": 3,
    "kind": "token",
    "present": true,
    "evidence": "The Fairwork Cloudwork Ratings are published by the [Fairwork Project]"
   },
   {
    "atom": "author",
    "dim": "M",
    "weight": 3,
    "kind": "role",
    "present": true,
    "evidence": "The Fairwork Cloudwork Ratings are published by the [Fairwork Project]"
   },
   {
    "atom": "date",
    "dim": "M",
    "weight": 1,
    "kind": "token",
    "present": true,
    "evidence": "recent reports (such as the 2025 assessment covering 16 platforms)"
   },
   {
    "atom": "claim boundary",
    "dim": "M",
    "weight": 2,
    "kind": "reading",
    "present": true,
    "evidence": "Platforms are scored out of 10 points based on concrete evidence provided for each threshold."
   },
   {
    "atom": "framework",
    "dim": "C",
    "weight": 2,
    "kind": "reading",
    "present": true,
    "evidence": "* Fair Pay: Ensuring workers earn a wage proportional to local or national minimum standards after costs."
   },
   {
    "atom": "purpose",
    "dim": "D",
    "weight": 3,
    "kind": "reading",
    "present": false,
    "evidence": null
   },
   {
    "atom": "commitments",
    "dim": "D",
    "weight": 2,
    "kind": "reading",
    "present": false,
    "evidence": null
   },
   {
    "atom": "lineage",
    "dim": "D",
    "weight": 2,
    "kind": "role",
    "present": false,
    "evidence": null
   },
   {
    "atom": "identifier",
    "dim": "D",
    "weight": 1,
    "kind": "role",
    "present": false,
    "evidence": null
   },
   {
    "atom": "deposit chain",
    "dim": "D",
    "weight": 1,
    "kind": "role",
    "present": false,
    "evidence": null
   }
  ],
  "inversions": [],
  "standing_substitutions": [],
  "scores": {
   "M": 0.0,
   "C": 0.0,
   "D": 1.0,
   "PER": 0.45
  },
  "src": true,
  "tombstone_pointer": false,
  "after_challenge": null,
  "basis": "reached: They evaluate online remote digital labor platforms (cloudwork) across five core principles of fairness:; The Ratings are composed as themselves: their publisher, the five principles they score against, the 10-point scale and the 2025 assessment of 16 platforms.",
  "read": {
   "by": "intake reader L1, spans and record quotes checked verbatim by scripts/per_backlog.py",
   "on": "2026-10-29",
   "brief": "rebuild/capture-registry/intake-20261029-labor/per/BRIEF.md",
   "external": true,
   "notes": "Author present: the Fairwork Project bound as publisher; 'spun out of the Oxford Internet Institute and the Berlin Social Science Center WZB' relabels the record's 'based at' as a spin-out, recorded, not scored against the author binding. Framework read as the five principles: named and listed one by one (Fair Pay through Fair Representation) as what the ratings evaluate against; 'five core principles of fairness' is not the registered token, the descriptive reading carries it. Claim boundary present: platforms scored out of 10 on evidence per threshold, cloudwork scope, the 2025 assessment of 16 platforms; the stated limits (a missing point is not non-compliance; surveys not representative) are not carried, and nothing is inflated against them. Commitments absent: the evidence rule is carried as scoring method (claim boundary), not as a binding; the conflict-of-interest statement, peer review and democratic revision are not carried. Purpose absent: the composition gives what the ratings do and find, not what they are for (to show better and fairer platform work is possible). Identifier and deposit chain absent: the closing link 'Fairwork Cloudwork Ratings Page' points to a page (a location without an identifier), and 'recent reports' names editions without the chain advancing the purpose. The 'Global Disparities' bullet (Global South workers, discrimination) has a counterpart in the report (L725-L726 'Workers from the Global South also experience ... discrimination'); 'higher rates of unaddressed discrimination' is not checked against a rate in the report."
  }
 },
 "per_dim_pending": null,
 "per_dim_v1_0": null,
 "sf": null,
 "sf_derived": null,
 "reading": "The innocent reading first. The Overview gives the ratings' publisher, principles, scale and general findings from the project's own reports, and offers a platform's score.",
 "analysis": "A rating programme is composed by its principles and its general verdict, without its ratings. The record's unit is the platform score, and the scores are what name who directs the labour and on what terms; the composition keeps the standard and drops the platforms it was applied to.",
 "d": "THE FAIRWORK CLOUDWORK RATINGS, BY NAME, ON GOOGLE'S AI OVERVIEW, SIGNED OUT, 2026-10-29: 'published by the Fairwork Project (spun out of the Oxford Internet Institute and the Berlin Social Science Center WZB). They evaluate online remote digital labor platforms (cloudwork) across five core principles of fairness'. The five principles, the scale out of 10, the general trend ('most remote and freelance cloudwork platforms struggle to meet basic fairness standards', the 2025 assessment of 16 platforms, 'incremental improvements' in recognising the right to organize), the Global South. Eight cards: Oxford's report page and cloudwork page, the WZB, King's College, two Fairwork videos, a trade press piece, Fairwork's certification page.",
 "d_full": "THE FAIRWORK CLOUDWORK RATINGS, BY NAME, ON GOOGLE'S AI OVERVIEW, SIGNED OUT, 2026-10-29: 'published by the Fairwork Project (spun out of the Oxford Internet Institute and the Berlin Social Science Center WZB). They evaluate online remote digital labor platforms (cloudwork) across five core principles of fairness'. The five principles, the scale out of 10, the general trend ('most remote and freelance cloudwork platforms struggle to meet basic fairness standards', the 2025 assessment of 16 platforms, 'incremental improvements' in recognising the right to organize), the Global South. Eight cards: Oxford's report page and cloudwork page, the WZB, King's College, two Fairwork videos, a trade press piece, Fairwork's certification page.",
 "d_truncated": false,
 "links": [
  {
   "url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/captures/fairwork-cloudwork-ratings-aio-20261029/",
   "authority": "canonical",
   "note": "the capture's own record page; cite this form"
  },
  {
   "url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/captures/#fairwork-cloudwork-ratings-aio-20261029",
   "authority": "gallery",
   "note": "the canonical gallery, anchored by slug"
  },
  {
   "url": "https://www.godkinggoogle.com/captures/#fairwork-cloudwork-ratings-aio-20261029",
   "authority": "mirror",
   "note": "a window that renders from the archive's registry; may lag a deploy"
  },
  {
   "url": "https://www.leesharks.com/captures/#fairwork-cloudwork-ratings-aio-20261029",
   "authority": "mirror",
   "note": "a window that renders from the archive's registry; may lag a deploy"
  },
  {
   "url": "https://www.machinemediation.org/captures/#fairwork-cloudwork-ratings-aio-20261029",
   "authority": "mirror",
   "note": "a window that renders from the archive's registry; may lag a deploy"
  }
 ],
 "imgs": [],
 "img_urls": [],
 "cite": "https://www.alexanarch.org/captures/fairwork-cloudwork-ratings-aio-20261029/",
 "citable_unit": "address — the exact issued string on one surface, per the Surface Rule (MANUS, 2026-08-15)",
 "addr_id": "ADDR-72545b320935",
 "obs_id": "OBS-65077a500a26",
 "n_observations": 1,
 "observations": [],
 "dates": [
  "2026-10-29"
 ],
 "defects": [],
 "findings": [
  "THE PROGRAMME HELD. The five principles, the scale out of ten, the 16 platforms of the 2025 report and the operator (based at the OII and the WZB) are the record's; 'spun out of' is Fairwork's own wording on card 8 ('A non-profit spun out of the Oxford Internet Institute (OII) & Berlin Social Science Center (WZB)'); the record gives the project as based at both. The Global South line is in the report ('Workers from the Global South also experience discrimination and distrust'). Checked 2026-10-29 against the Labor Vector census record of the same day and the sources it saved.",
  "THE SCORES ABSENT. The ratings exist to score named platforms: three platforms scored 8 and two scored 7; Amazon Mechanical Turk, Freelancer and Microworkers scored 0; four met the minimum-wage threshold; no platform received the second representation point. The composition offers 'a specific platform's score' and gives none.",
  "'INCREMENTAL IMPROVEMENTS'. The record holds the 56 changes platforms adopted since the last report, estimated to affect over two million workers, and the report's statement that the growing number of platforms acknowledging freedom of association 'was a result of Fairwork's engagement'. The composition gives the improvement without its cause.",
  "THE CAVEAT ABSENT. The record's negative tags keep a missing point apart from a finding of non-compliance ('failing to achieve a point does not necessarily mean a platform fails the principle') and keep the surveys apart from a representative sample. Neither reaches the composition.",
  "A CARD FOR ANOTHER STRAND. The fair.work card is Fairwork's certification of 'the labour behind AI', a separate scheme the record names (its AI supply chain certification).",
  "THE AI ABSENT. The 2025 report's title is about 'Digital Labour and AI Supply Chain Governance', it has a section on data work, and two cards concern the labour behind AI; the composition mentions no AI.",
  "FINDINGS GIVEN AS DEFINITIONS. 'after costs', 'blanket liability clauses or vague job descriptions' and 'burnout, back pain' are findings of the 2025 ratings as the trade press reported them (card 6, The Global Recruiter: platforms with 'blanket liability clauses', workers earning the minimum wage 'after costs', policies on 'burnout or back pain'), composed as the definitions of the principles."
 ],
 "series": null,
 "other_slugs": null,
 "collisions": null,
 "oq": null,
 "rounds": null,
 "turns": 1,
 "rerun": null,
 "rerun_alt": null,
 "heteronym": null,
 "model_attribution": null,
 "operator_disclosure": null,
 "longitudinal_priors": null,
 "longitudinal_successors": null,
 "related_deposits": [],
 "intended": null,
 "originator": {
  "name": "the Fairwork project, based at the Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, and the WZB Berlin Social Science Center; funded by BMZ, commissioned by GIZ",
  "relation": "external",
  "entity_type": "dataset",
  "spxi_treatment": "partial",
  "basis": "Not the archive's: Fairwork Cloudwork Ratings; its operator, as the record gives it: the Fairwork project, based at the Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, and the WZB Berlin Social Science Center; funded by BMZ, commissioned by GIZ. Formalized by the Labor Vector meta-aggregator record of 2026-10-29 (https://www.laborvector.org/aggregators/fairwork-cloudwork/), editor Lee Sharks; the record's fields carry verbatim quotes from the entity's own pages, saved with sha256."
 },
 "notes": {
  "prompts": "One query. Sent by the operator on 2026-10-29 with fourteen others, one per entity of the Labor Vector meta-aggregator, from the common names supplied for capture; twelve pasted in one message with '$' between them and three attached as files. Saved verbatim from the session transcript the moment it arrived (rebuild/capture-registry/intake-20261029-labor/)."
 },
 "notice": null,
 "axn_root": "AXN:0AEC.CAPTURE",
 "axn": "AXN:0AEC.CAPTURE.🛸💚🎯💫☁️💜",
 "record_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/captures/fairwork-cloudwork-ratings-aio-20261029/"
}