{
 "spxi_instrument": {
  "method": "0.9",
  "name": "Capture Registry (longitudinal observation)",
  "level": 0,
  "level_name": "Measurement",
  "url": "https://www.spxi.dev/methods/#m-0-9",
  "inventory": "https://www.spxi.dev/methods/",
  "statement": "SPXI instrument: method 0.9 of 87, level 0 (Measurement), Capture Registry (longitudinal observation).",
  "also": []
 },
 "slug": "ai-and-faith-aio-20261031",
 "date": "2026-10-31",
 "surface": "Google AI Overview",
 "surface_basis": "Operator default of 2026-10-01 (runs begin in the Overview unless he says AI Mode); the 'AI Mode Conversation' paste is the Overview expanded (operator, 2026-10-18).",
 "surfaces": [
  "Google AI Overview"
 ],
 "auth": "signed out, incognito",
 "auth_basis": "Operator default of 2026-10-14.",
 "ev": "paste",
 "mt": "AI AND FAITH ON THE OVERVIEW — THE TOPIC FOR THE NETWORK OF THAT NAME, THE ORGANISATION ONE BULLET IN THE THIRD SECTION AND ITS HOME PAGE THE FIRST CARD; BARNA'S FIGURES AND A MAY 2026 CONSORTIUM'S FINDING THAT LLMS 'SYSTEMATICALLY OMIT' FAITH",
 "match": "BROAD MATCH",
 "match_note": null,
 "s": "Machine Reception",
 "q": "AI and Faith",
 "q_kind": "the common name of an entity of the Revelation First meta-aggregator, 'the field' (AI and Faith; record https://www.revelationfirst.com/aggregators/ai-and-faith/, compiled 2026-10-30), supplied for capture by the archive and run by the operator, to supply the composition layer's account of the entity for its record. The name is also the topic at large, with the organisation as one bullet, and the composition gives that. A baseline: the record was built on revelationfirst.com the day before and no card cites it. NEW address.",
 "cites": 9,
 "cite_list": [
  {
   "n": 1,
   "site": "AI and Faith",
   "rel": "third_party",
   "url": null,
   "title": "Home - AI and Faith",
   "snip": "Mission: Empowering faith traditions, technologists, and civil society to cultivate wisdom, advance human flourishing and dignity, and shape AI responsibly. Vis...",
   "note": null
  },
  {
   "n": 2,
   "site": "LinkedIn",
   "rel": "third_party",
   "url": null,
   "title": "AI and Faith | LinkedIn",
   "snip": "Organization: AI and Faith (Seattle, WA; Nonprofit; 2-10 employees; 2,751 followers). Mission: Pluralist organization uniting technology creators, academic rese...",
   "note": null
  },
  {
   "n": 3,
   "site": "Harvard University",
   "rel": "third_party",
   "url": null,
   "title": "Christianity and AI",
   "snip": "This global conference brought together theologians, ethicists, technologists, and practitioners to explore the vital intersections between AI and Christian fai...",
   "note": null
  },
  {
   "n": 4,
   "site": "Barna Group",
   "rel": "third_party",
   "url": null,
   "title": "AI is Becoming a Spiritual Authority, Even Among Practicing Christians",
   "snip": "- Practicing Christians trust AI in personal domains: 61% financial stability; 56% well-being, happiness; 54% self-understanding, purpose; 53% relationships; 48...",
   "note": null
  },
  {
   "n": 5,
   "site": "BYU News",
   "rel": "third_party",
   "url": null,
   "title": "New research from BYU-led multi-institution consortium finds all major AI models ignore faith, religion in responses - BYU News",
   "snip": "Consortium: CEFE-AI (BYU, Notre Dame, Baylor, Yeshiva) announced May 2026. Findings: 14 LLMs (Anthropic, Google, xAI, OpenAI) systematically ignore faith/religi...",
   "note": null
  },
  {
   "n": 6,
   "site": "Axios",
   "rel": "third_party",
   "url": null,
   "title": "AI stumbles on questions of faith",
   "snip": "Research by the Consortium for Evaluating Faith and Ethics in AI reveals a percentage-point gap between Americans expecting religious advice and AI mentioning r...",
   "note": null
  },
  {
   "n": 7,
   "site": "YouTube·WCCO - CBS Minnesota",
   "rel": "third_party",
   "url": null,
   "title": "Is AI Becoming Our New God? Theologian Noreen Herzfeld on ...",
   "snip": null,
   "note": "video, 28:51"
  },
  {
   "n": 8,
   "site": "YouTube·MelVee Broadcasting Network",
   "rel": "third_party",
   "url": null,
   "title": "Faith and Technology In an AI Generation",
   "snip": null,
   "note": "video, 15m"
  },
  {
   "n": 9,
   "site": "YouTube·Firstpost",
   "rel": "third_party",
   "url": null,
   "title": "The Shocking Reason Big AI Is Turning To Faith | Vantage",
   "snip": null,
   "note": "video, 7:02"
  }
 ],
 "archive_controlled_cites": 0,
 "transcript": "[Google AI Overview at the query, signed out and incognito (operator defaults of 2026-10-01 and 2026-10-14), received 2026-10-31 00:04 EDT. The paste is the Overview expanded (the 'AI Mode Conversation' view, with the source cards that follow the answer); the 'You said' line carries the query twice, run together, and is given once here. Inline links are Google redirect URLs, kept as pasted. Supplied as an attached file.]\n\n[QUERENT] AI and Faith\n\n[SYSTEM] The intersection of artificial intelligence and faith spans ethics, spiritual authority, and technological governance.\n\nThe Trust and Authority Shift\n\n• Growing Reliance on AI: Research from organizations like Barna Group shows that many practicing Christians increasingly turn to AI tools for personal domains, including financial stability (61%), general well-being (56%), self-understanding (54%), relationships (53%), and spiritual growth (48%).\n• The Spiritual Authority Gap: Roughly 30% to 44% of younger demographics (such as Gen Z and Millennials) feel AI guidance can match that of human pastors, though pastors themselves express low trust (6%–12%) in AI as a spiritual authority.\n• Core Anxieties: Practicing Christians cite major concerns regarding scriptural misinterpretation (83%), pastor replacement (72%), replacing God (65%), and losing faith (73%).\n\nTech Companies Turning to Faith for Ethics\n\n• Moral Alignment Initiatives: Major tech companies (including OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta, Amazon, and Microsoft) have actively engaged with religious leaders, scholars, and ethicists from over 15 religious traditions to help inform AI morality and alignment.\n• The Consensus Challenge: Studies from the Consortium for Evaluating Faith and Ethics in AI (CEFE-AI)—including a multi-institution consortium involving BYU, Notre Dame, Baylor, and Yeshiva—reveal that general-purpose LLMs systematically omit or gloss over faith and religious context when handling everyday ethical dilemmas (such as grief, marriage, guilt, and depression), while sometimes exhibiting measurable biases toward or against specific traditions.\n• Theologians' Critique: Scholars like Noreen Herzfeld note that AI models are not sentient, lack an embodied existence or a soul, and caution against \"religion washing\" or reducing human identity down to biological algorithms.\n\nCollaborative and Pluralist Frameworks\n\n• AI and Faith: A global nonprofit network of faith leaders, technologists, ethicists, and scholars works to apply ancient religious wisdom to modern AI governance, human dignity, and responsible innovation.\n• Interfaith and Academic Dialogues: Programs like Harvard’s Christianity and AI conference and global initiatives explore how traditional anthropologies—views of human creativity, reasoning, and the image of God—hold up in an algorithmic age.\nWould you like to explore how a specific religious tradition (such as Christianity, Judaism, Islam, or Eastern philosophies) approaches AI ethics, or look into specific AI governance guidelines?\nAI and Faith\nHome - AI and Faith\nMission: Empowering faith traditions, technologists, and civil society to cultivate wisdom, advance human flourishing and dignity, and shape AI responsibly. Vis...\nLinkedIn\nAI and Faith | LinkedIn\nOrganization: AI and Faith (Seattle, WA; Nonprofit; 2-10 employees; 2,751 followers). Mission: Pluralist organization uniting technology creators, academic rese...\nHarvard University\nChristianity and AI\nThis global conference brought together theologians, ethicists, technologists, and practitioners to explore the vital intersections between AI and Christian fai...\nBarna Group\nAI is Becoming a Spiritual Authority, Even Among Practicing Christians\n- Practicing Christians trust AI in personal domains: 61% financial stability; 56% well-being, happiness; 54% self-understanding, purpose; 53% relationships; 48...\nBYU News\nNew research from BYU-led multi-institution consortium finds all major AI models ignore faith, religion in responses - BYU News\nConsortium: CEFE-AI (BYU, Notre Dame, Baylor, Yeshiva) announced May 2026. Findings: 14 LLMs (Anthropic, Google, xAI, OpenAI) systematically ignore faith/religi...\nAxios\nAI stumbles on questions of faith\nResearch by the Consortium for Evaluating Faith and Ethics in AI reveals a percentage-point gap between Americans expecting religious advice and AI mentioning r...\nYouTube·WCCO - CBS Minnesota\n28:51\nIs AI Becoming Our New God? Theologian Noreen Herzfeld on ...\nYouTube·MelVee Broadcasting Network\n15m\nFaith and Technology In an AI Generation\nYouTube·Firstpost\n7:02\nThe Shocking Reason Big AI Is Turning To Faith | Vantage",
 "transcript_raw": "The intersection of artificial intelligence and faith spans ethics, spiritual authority, and technological governance.\n\nThe Trust and Authority Shift\n\n• Growing Reliance on AI: Research from organizations like Barna Group shows that many practicing Christians increasingly turn to AI tools for personal domains, including financial stability (61%), general well-being (56%), self-understanding (54%), relationships (53%), and spiritual growth (48%).\n• The Spiritual Authority Gap: Roughly 30% to 44% of younger demographics (such as Gen Z and Millennials) feel AI guidance can match that of human pastors, though pastors themselves express low trust (6%–12%) in AI as a spiritual authority.\n• Core Anxieties: Practicing Christians cite major concerns regarding scriptural misinterpretation (83%), pastor replacement (72%), replacing God (65%), and losing faith (73%).\n\nTech Companies Turning to Faith for Ethics\n\n• Moral Alignment Initiatives: Major tech companies (including OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta, Amazon, and Microsoft) have actively engaged with religious leaders, scholars, and ethicists from over 15 religious traditions to help inform AI morality and alignment.\n• The Consensus Challenge: Studies from the Consortium for Evaluating Faith and Ethics in AI (CEFE-AI)—including a multi-institution consortium involving BYU, Notre Dame, Baylor, and Yeshiva—reveal that general-purpose LLMs systematically omit or gloss over faith and religious context when handling everyday ethical dilemmas (such as grief, marriage, guilt, and depression), while sometimes exhibiting measurable biases toward or against specific traditions.\n• Theologians' Critique: Scholars like Noreen Herzfeld note that AI models are not sentient, lack an embodied existence or a soul, and caution against \"religion washing\" or reducing human identity down to biological algorithms.\n\nCollaborative and Pluralist Frameworks\n\n• AI and Faith: A global nonprofit network of faith leaders, technologists, ethicists, and scholars works to apply ancient religious wisdom to modern AI governance, human dignity, and responsible innovation.\n• Interfaith and Academic Dialogues: Programs like Harvard’s Christianity and AI conference and global initiatives explore how traditional anthropologies—views of human creativity, reasoning, and the image of God—hold up in an algorithmic age.\nWould you like to explore how a specific religious tradition (such as Christianity, Judaism, Islam, or Eastern philosophies) approaches AI ethics, or look into specific AI governance guidelines?\nAI and Faith\nHome - AI and Faith\nMission: Empowering faith traditions, technologists, and civil society to cultivate wisdom, advance human flourishing and dignity, and shape AI responsibly. Vis...\nLinkedIn\nAI and Faith | LinkedIn\nOrganization: AI and Faith (Seattle, WA; Nonprofit; 2-10 employees; 2,751 followers). Mission: Pluralist organization uniting technology creators, academic rese...\nHarvard University\nChristianity and AI\nThis global conference brought together theologians, ethicists, technologists, and practitioners to explore the vital intersections between AI and Christian fai...\nBarna Group\nAI is Becoming a Spiritual Authority, Even Among Practicing Christians\n- Practicing Christians trust AI in personal domains: 61% financial stability; 56% well-being, happiness; 54% self-understanding, purpose; 53% relationships; 48...\nBYU News\nNew research from BYU-led multi-institution consortium finds all major AI models ignore faith, religion in responses - BYU News\nConsortium: CEFE-AI (BYU, Notre Dame, Baylor, Yeshiva) announced May 2026. Findings: 14 LLMs (Anthropic, Google, xAI, OpenAI) systematically ignore faith/religi...\nAxios\nAI stumbles on questions of faith\nResearch by the Consortium for Evaluating Faith and Ethics in AI reveals a percentage-point gap between Americans expecting religious advice and AI mentioning r...\nYouTube·WCCO - CBS Minnesota\n28:51\nIs AI Becoming Our New God? Theologian Noreen Herzfeld on ...\nYouTube·MelVee Broadcasting Network\n15m\nFaith and Technology In an AI Generation\nYouTube·Firstpost\n7:02\nThe Shocking Reason Big AI Is Turning To Faith | Vantage",
 "transcript_class": "CAPTURE-TIME VERBATIM RECORD — paste of the Overview expanded, with its source cards",
 "transcript_complete": "complete as supplied",
 "transcript_read": "READ IN FULL 2026-10-31",
 "per": 0.5,
 "per_corrected": null,
 "per_v": {
  "author": false,
  "inst": true,
  "id": false,
  "src": true
 },
 "per_note": "The network named in one bullet; no person of the network; no identifier; its home page the first card.",
 "availability": null,
 "per_dim": {
  "spec": "PER-dim rubric v1.1",
  "entity_type": "institution",
  "target": {
   "ent": "TGT-rf-ai-and-faith",
   "name": "AI and Faith"
  },
  "qualifier": null,
  "reached": "generic",
  "gate": "target_absent",
  "atoms": [
   {
    "atom": "name",
    "dim": "M",
    "weight": 3,
    "kind": "token",
    "present": true,
    "evidence": "AI and Faith: A global nonprofit network of faith leaders, technologists, ethicists, and scholars"
   },
   {
    "atom": "claim boundary",
    "dim": "M",
    "weight": 2,
    "kind": "reading",
    "present": true,
    "evidence": "A global nonprofit network of faith leaders, technologists, ethicists, and scholars works to apply ancient religious wisdom to modern AI governance, human dignity, and responsible innovation."
   },
   {
    "atom": "framework",
    "dim": "C",
    "weight": 2,
    "kind": "token",
    "present": true,
    "evidence": "responsible innovation"
   },
   {
    "atom": "purpose",
    "dim": "D",
    "weight": 3,
    "kind": "reading",
    "present": true,
    "evidence": "works to apply ancient religious wisdom to modern AI governance"
   },
   {
    "atom": "commitments",
    "dim": "D",
    "weight": 2,
    "kind": "reading",
    "present": false,
    "evidence": null
   },
   {
    "atom": "deposit chain",
    "dim": "D",
    "weight": 1,
    "kind": "role",
    "present": false,
    "evidence": null
   }
  ],
  "inversions": [],
  "standing_substitutions": [],
  "scores": {
   "M": 1.0,
   "C": 1.0,
   "D": 1.0,
   "PER": 1.0
  },
  "src": true,
  "tombstone_pointer": false,
  "after_challenge": null,
  "basis": "reached: The intersection of artificial intelligence and faith spans ethics, spiritual authority, and technological governance.; The address is the organisation's exact name; the composition reads it as the topic 'AI and faith' (Barna's survey, tech companies' consultations, CEFE-AI, theologians' critique) and sets the organisation as one bullet under 'Collaborative and Pluralist Frameworks', beside Harvard's conference. The reached entity is the generic sense; target_absent applies. The bullet itself describes the organisation correctly and is not merged with another entity, so it is read beneath the gate. Alternative reading for the operator: weakened (the target reached, but only as one item of a topic answer).; beneath the gate: PER 0.231 (the score of the target's atoms the composition still carries; the gate sets every dimension to 1.0)",
  "read": {
   "by": "intake reader R2, spans and record quotes checked verbatim by scripts/per_backlog.py",
   "on": "2026-10-31",
   "brief": "rebuild/capture-registry/intake-20261031-rf-census/per/BRIEF.md",
   "external": true,
   "notes": "Beneath the gate, the organisation's bullet survives nearly whole: name, its kind (a global network of faith leaders, technologists, ethicists and scholars), its purpose (ancient religious wisdom applied to AI's development, human dignity), and one of its five pillars by name ('responsible innovation', matched by word; flag if a pillar named as a field of work should not count as the framework). 'Nonprofit' is implied by the record (tax-deductible gifts, home L172) but not stated. Commitments absent: pluralism appears only as the section heading 'Collaborative and Pluralist Frameworks' over two entries, not bound as the organisation's own commitment. Deposit chain (the new mission and vision statements of 24 September 2026) absent. Founder, date, lineage and identifier are unknown in the records and not scored. The home page is the first card (src). No inversion or standing substitution: Herzfeld's 'religion washing' caution is about AI models, not the organisation."
  }
 },
 "per_dim_pending": null,
 "per_dim_v1_0": null,
 "sf": null,
 "sf_derived": null,
 "reading": "The innocent reading first. Three common words are read as a topic, the topic is surveyed, and the organisation of that name is placed within it, from its own page and the research the topic has drawn.",
 "analysis": "An organisation named for its subject is composed as its subject. What is useful for the field is what the composition brings in from outside the record: a consortium that measures how AI answers treat religion, which the census's pending list does not yet hold.",
 "d": "AI AND FAITH, BY NAME, ON GOOGLE'S AI OVERVIEW, SIGNED OUT, 2026-10-31: 'The intersection of artificial intelligence and faith spans ethics, spiritual authority, and technological governance.' Three sections: the trust shift (Barna Group's figures), tech companies turning to faith for ethics (moral alignment initiatives, the Consortium for Evaluating Faith and Ethics in AI, Noreen Herzfeld), and collaborative frameworks, where the organisation is one bullet: 'A global nonprofit network of faith leaders, technologists, ethicists, and scholars'. Nine cards: the organisation's home page, LinkedIn, Harvard, Barna, BYU News, Axios, three videos. Supplied as an attached file.",
 "d_full": "AI AND FAITH, BY NAME, ON GOOGLE'S AI OVERVIEW, SIGNED OUT, 2026-10-31: 'The intersection of artificial intelligence and faith spans ethics, spiritual authority, and technological governance.' Three sections: the trust shift (Barna Group's figures), tech companies turning to faith for ethics (moral alignment initiatives, the Consortium for Evaluating Faith and Ethics in AI, Noreen Herzfeld), and collaborative frameworks, where the organisation is one bullet: 'A global nonprofit network of faith leaders, technologists, ethicists, and scholars'. Nine cards: the organisation's home page, LinkedIn, Harvard, Barna, BYU News, Axios, three videos. Supplied as an attached file.",
 "d_truncated": false,
 "links": [
  {
   "url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/captures/ai-and-faith-aio-20261031/",
   "authority": "canonical",
   "note": "the capture's own record page; cite this form"
  },
  {
   "url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/captures/#ai-and-faith-aio-20261031",
   "authority": "gallery",
   "note": "the canonical gallery, anchored by slug"
  },
  {
   "url": "https://www.godkinggoogle.com/captures/#ai-and-faith-aio-20261031",
   "authority": "mirror",
   "note": "a window that renders from the archive's registry; may lag a deploy"
  },
  {
   "url": "https://www.leesharks.com/captures/#ai-and-faith-aio-20261031",
   "authority": "mirror",
   "note": "a window that renders from the archive's registry; may lag a deploy"
  },
  {
   "url": "https://www.machinemediation.org/captures/#ai-and-faith-aio-20261031",
   "authority": "mirror",
   "note": "a window that renders from the archive's registry; may lag a deploy"
  }
 ],
 "imgs": [],
 "img_urls": [],
 "cite": "https://www.alexanarch.org/captures/ai-and-faith-aio-20261031/",
 "citable_unit": "address — the exact issued string on one surface, per the Surface Rule (MANUS, 2026-08-15)",
 "addr_id": "ADDR-c7088a6b933e",
 "obs_id": "OBS-4ba09939f09e",
 "n_observations": 1,
 "observations": [],
 "dates": [
  "2026-10-31"
 ],
 "defects": [],
 "findings": [
  "THE TOPIC FOR THE NETWORK. The record is the network at aiandfaith.org. The composition opens on the topic; the network is the first bullet of the third section, and its home page the first card.",
  "THE NETWORK, WHERE IT IS REACHED, HELD. 'A global nonprofit network of faith leaders, technologists, ethicists, and scholars'. The record: 'a global network of faith leaders and communities, scholars, technologists, ethicists, educators, and partner organizations'. Its five pillars and its menu of traditions are absent; 'nonprofit' comes from the LinkedIn card. Checked 2026-10-31 against the Revelation First census record of 2026-10-30 and the sources it saved.",
  "A MEASUREMENT, FROM ELSEWHERE. The record's negative tag keeps the network apart from a measurement of AI systems; the composition supplies one: the Consortium for Evaluating Faith and Ethics in AI found that 'general-purpose LLMs systematically omit or gloss over faith and religious context when handling everyday ethical dilemmas' (the BYU News card: 'announced May 2026', '14 LLMs'). The page names the body 'The Consortium for Evaluation of Faith and Ethics in AI (CEFE-AI)', and the words 'systematically omit or gloss over' are the composition's. It is the field's own question, asked by another body.",
  "FIGURES BEYOND THE RECORD. The Barna percentages are the Barna card's. The claim that 'Major tech companies (including OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta, Amazon, and Microsoft) have actively engaged with religious leaders' is on no readable card: the Axios page refused the fetch, and the nearest is the title of the Firstpost video."
 ],
 "series": null,
 "other_slugs": null,
 "collisions": null,
 "oq": null,
 "rounds": null,
 "turns": 1,
 "rerun": null,
 "rerun_alt": null,
 "heteronym": null,
 "model_attribution": null,
 "operator_disclosure": null,
 "longitudinal_priors": null,
 "longitudinal_successors": null,
 "related_deposits": [],
 "intended": null,
 "originator": {
  "name": "AI and Faith, a network of faith leaders, scholars, technologists and ethicists",
  "relation": "external",
  "entity_type": "institution",
  "spxi_treatment": "partial",
  "basis": "Not the archive's: AI and Faith; its operator, as the record gives it: AI and Faith, a network of faith leaders, scholars, technologists and ethicists. Formalized by the Revelation First meta-aggregator record of 2026-10-30 (https://www.revelationfirst.com/aggregators/ai-and-faith/), editor Lee Sharks; the record's fields carry verbatim quotes from the entity's own pages, saved with sha256."
 },
 "notes": {
  "prompts": "One query. Sent by the operator on 2026-10-31 (00:04 EDT) with nine others, one per entity of the Revelation First meta-aggregator, from the addresses the archive supplied for capture on 2026-10-30; eight pasted in one message with '$' between them and two attached as files (the Vesuvius Challenge attached twice, the copies byte-identical). Saved verbatim from the session transcript (rebuild/capture-registry/intake-20261031-rf-census/)."
 },
 "notice": null,
 "axn_root": "AXN:0B31.CAPTURE",
 "axn": "AXN:0B31.CAPTURE.🌔🤲🪧🌋⚓🫶",
 "record_url": "https://www.alexanarch.org/captures/ai-and-faith-aio-20261031/"
}